Campaign Finance
07/16/2019

Highlights of State Campaign Finance Reports

TXElects

Most of 2019’s early money went to the 2022 ballot.

July semiannual campaign finance reports were due yesterday (Monday) for state officeholders and candidates, including legislators and those running against them, and generally became available online today (Tuesday). They cover contributions received and expenditures made during the first six months of 2019. For incumbents, those contributions could be received only during a 14-day window at the end of June, except for a handful of legislators who won special elections earlier this year.

Nearly $26M was given to state officeholders, legislators and candidates during the first half of the year. Statewide officials not on the ballot in 2020 accounted for $18.7M of it – 72% of the total. Our Crib Sheets have been fully updated with the latest campaign finance numbers. We covered federal offices’ July quarterly reports yesterday.

Statewide Offices

Statewide officials actually on the ballot in 2020 were led by Railroad Comm. Ryan Sitton ($539K in contributions), Supreme Court Justice Brett Busby ($489K) and Chief Justice Nathan Hecht ($284K). Sitton was out-raised by fellow Comm. Christi Craddick ($559K), who is not up for re-election until 2024, but his $1.9M cash-on-hand total exceeds Craddick’s ($1.6M).

GOV: Gov. Greg Abbott (R), who is not on the ballot until 2022, was responsible for 47% of all funds raised by all statewide and legislative candidates, including challengers. He raised $12.1M during the last 14 days of June, including $1M donations from Midland oil and gas executive Javaid Anwar and Doss ranchers Michael and Mary Porter. Abbott has $27.1M on hand, nearly as much as the entire U.S. House delegation from Texas ($29.3M).

Abbott has raised $89.5M since becoming Governor in 2015, which puts him just $20.7M behind the total amount Rick Perry raised as Governor between 2001 and 2015. Across all statewide offices they’ve held, going as far back as campaign finance records exist(ed) online, Abbott has out-raised Perry, $179M to $133M. Abbott’s $27.1M cash-on-hand total is just the 12th highest in state history, trailing 11 other Abbott totals. His current cash on hand exceeds Perry’s highest-ever reported total by $15.4M.

Since 2013, Abbott has raised $148M. His reported cash on hand totals have exceeded $20M for every reporting period except for just before and after the 2014 general election, the end of the 2015 legislative session and just after the 2018 general election.

LTGOV: Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick (R), who is not on the ballot until 2022, raised $3.1M – 12% of all funds raised by statewide and legislative candidates – and has $11M on hand. His cash-on-hand figure is the sixth highest ever reported by a Lt. Governor, trailing five other Patrick reports. Patrick has raised $33.1M since becoming Lt. Governor in 2015.

AG: Atty. Gen. Ken Paxton raised $1.4M and has $3.5M on hand.

COMP: Comptroller Glenn Hegar raised $836K and has $6.3M on hand.

SC7: Justice Jeff Boyd (R), who is up for re-election in 2020, raised $197K and has $491K on hand. Announced Democratic challenger Brandy Voss raised $138K and has $214K on hand.

Senate

Senators on the ballot in 2020 and announced challengers collectively raised $843K, nearly half of which was raised by Sen. Dawn Buckingham (R-Lake Travis). Sens. Brandon Creighton (R-Conroe), Pete Flores (R-Pleasanton) and Jane Nelson (R-Flower Mound) reported no contributions, but Creighton ($869K) and Nelson ($1.5M) have large cash balances. Flores has $199K on hand. Rep. Roland Gutierrez (D-San Antonio), who unsuccessfully sought the SD19 seat in a 2018 special election, raised $108K and has $119K on hand.

The most interesting set of numbers comes from SD27, where longtime Sen. Eddie Lucio Jr. (D-San Benito) raised less than $5K and has less than $50K on hand, which could be a sign that Lucio may be retiring. Despite those low numbers, his announced primary challenger Sara Stapleton-Barrera raised just over $4K and has less than $1K on hand.

House of Representatives

HD25: Speaker Dennis Bonnen (R-Angleton) raised $1K, spent almost $4M and has $669K on hand. Bonnen’s campaign contributed $3M to the new Texas Leads PAC, for which he was its sole contributor for the period. Bonnen’s announced primary challenger, Rhonda Seth, raised $14K and has $8K on hand.

HD26: Democratic challenger Rish Oberoi ($53K) and Republican primary challenger Jacey Jetton ($26K) each raised more than the $20K received by Rep. Rick Miller (R-Sugar Land), who reported having just $7K on hand, far less than either Jetton ($55K) or Oberoi ($47K).

HD45: Rep. Erin Zwiener (D-Dripping Springs) was out-raised by Republican challengers Carrie Isaac ($103K) and Kent “Bud” Wymore ($63K). Zwiener’s $28K cash-on-hand figure trails Isaac ($94K) and Wymore ($61K). Isaac’s funds came mostly from small donations. Her largest contributors were Dripping Springs executive Robert Seale ($20K), Rep. Mayes Middleton ($5K) and former Rep. Jason Isaac ($3K), her husband.

HD47: Rep. Vikki Goodwin (D-Austin) raised $17K, which was less than each of her five announced Republican challengers. Don Zimmerman ($38K), Jenny Forgey ($37K), Justin Berry ($26K), Aaron Reitz ($23K) and Jennifer Fleck ($19K) collectively out-raised Goodwin, $143K to $17K. All six candidates have between $23K and $39K on hand.

HD59: Primary challenger Cody Johnson out-raised Rep. J.D. Sheffield (R-Gatesville), $66K to $9K, and Johnson has a $301K to $78K advantage in cash on hand, backed by a $250K loan. His largest contributors were Twisted Chicks LLC ($25K) and Stephenville horse breeder Charlie Buchanan ($23K). The other announced primary challenger, Shelby Slawson, raised less than $1K but has $48K on hand because of a $50K loan.

HD97: Rep. Craig Goldman (R-Fort Worth) raised $73K and has $481K on hand. Announced Democratic challenger Elizabeth Beck raised $41K and has $22K on hand.

HD108: Nearly a half a million dollars has already flowed into HD108. Rep. Morgan Meyer (R-Dallas) was out-raised by Democratic challenger Shawn Terry, $235K to $156K, and they both have nearly identical cash-on-hand totals of $192K and $193K, respectively. Terry had the highest contribution total for any non-incumbent and arguably had the highest contribution total for the period. The only higher total – Rep. Mayes Middleton’s (R-Wallisville) $300K – was almost entirely self-funded. Terry’s largest contributors were Dallas retiree Gregory Alexander ($25K), Dallas venture capitalist Cameron Chalmers ($10K), Dallas real estate investor Morgan Cox ($10K) and Dallas venture capitalist David Muzzo ($10K). The other two announced Democratic challengers, Joanna Cattanach and Tom Ervin, raised $64K and $42K, respectively.

HD114: Republican challenger Luisa Del Rosal out-raised Rep. John Turner (D-Dallas), $161K to $35K, but the incumbent has the advantage in cash on hand, $210K to $152K. Del Rosal’s largest contributors were Dallas real estate developer Harlan Crow ($50K), Dallas homemaker Jeanne Cox ($10K) and Dallas auto dealer Carl Sewell ($10K).

HD134: Democratic challenger Ann Johnson out-raised Rep. Sarah Davis (R-Houston), $131K to $25K, but trails the incumbent in cash on hand, $203K to $119K. Johnson’s largest contributor was Houston attorney Amber Mostyn ($15K).

HD135: Rep. Jon Rosenthal (D-Houston) was out-raised by each of his announced Republican challengers, and he has less on hand than either of them. Mark McCaig raised $52K and has $75K on hand. Justin Ray raised $36K and has $27K on hand. Rosenthal raised $10K and has $13K on hand.

HD138: Democratic challenger Josh Wallenstein out-raised Rep. Dwayne Bohac (R-Houston), $54K to $27K, and has the advantage on cash on hand, $53K to $28K. The other announced Democratic challenger, Akilah Bacy, raised $21K and has $21K on hand.

HD147: Rep. Garnet Coleman contributed $300K to the Thinking Is Underrated PAC, leaving him with $155K on hand. Coleman reported no contributions, and he is the sole contributor to that PAC.

Gov. Greg Abbott

©2019 Texas Election Source LLC

🎙️We Have a Podcast! 🎙️

Bills and Business is your go-to podcast for conversations related to Texas legislation and business. Hosted by Laura Carr, Co-Founder of USLege—an AI-driven legislative tracking software—we bring you in-depth analysis on economic trends, impactful legislation, and key developments shaping Texas business.

Subscribe on Youtube and Spotify for weekly episodes!

🔍 USLege - The Only AI-First Political Tracking Solution ✨

USLege helps you track legislation and find what you need faster from bills, committee hearings, floor debates, and state agency meetings faster.

Say goodbye to tedious tasks!

You can follow USLege on LinkedIn, Facebook, and X.

🤝 Texas Association of Business 📈

Texas Association of Business (TAB) is the Texas State Chamber, representing companies of every size and industry. TAB’s purpose is to champion the best business climate in the world, unleashing the power of free enterprise to enhance lives for generations.

You can follow TAB on LinkedIn, Facebook, and X.

Table of Content
  1. 01 First
Trusted by Government Affairs Professionals and Corporate Policy Teams
Blog & Articles

Read more news

How to Choose the Best Legislative Tracking Software for Your Organization
This is some text inside of a div block.

In today’s fast-paced policy environment, staying informed is a constant challenge. Bills, hearings, and regulatory updates move quickly across jurisdictions, creating risks for organizations that rely on timely information, including the risk of missing important information when relying on manual processes. Choosing the best legislative tracking software is one of the most effective ways to manage legislative and regulatory tracking efficiently, minimize missed opportunities, and strengthen decision-making.

This article walks you through how to evaluate legislative and regulatory tools, compare coverage and capabilities, and understand which features help government affairs professionals and public affairs teams stay informed and a step ahead of rapid change. You’ll learn how to assess software platforms, review vendor performance, and apply a clear framework to guide your organization’s choice.

If you’re exploring modern solutions for policy monitoring, visit the best legislative tracking software to see how advanced systems help professionals track activity and analyze critical information across multiple jurisdictions.

Why Legislative Tracking Software Matters

Every legislative session brings thousands of new bills and hearings across the federal government, state legislatures, and local governments. For government affairs teams and law firms that must monitor state legislation or track regulations, the pace of change can be overwhelming.

Without digital platforms, staff may spend hours each day manually searching databases, reading committee reports, and updating spreadsheets. That process isn’t just inefficient—it’s risky. Missing one act or amendment could affect compliance, advocacy strategy, or even public reputation. Relying on manual tracking increases the chance of overlooking important details in legislative information, which can lead to missing critical updates or changes.

The Challenge of Volume and Velocity

  • Legislative and regulatory tracking spans bills, hearings, amendments, and regulations that appear daily.
  • Strategic decisions depend on access to verified data and real-time alerts.
  • Regulatory developments from government agencies can impact clients and advocacy groups instantly.

The Payoff

Automated tracking saves time, reduces human error, and delivers actionable insights faster. Teams can filter results, share updates, and focus their attention where it matters most—on influencing policy and shaping outcomes.

Key Features and Capabilities to Look For

Choosing the right tracking platform starts with understanding what differentiates effective tools from simple alert systems. Below are core features to evaluate before purchasing or implementing any solution.

Coverage Across Jurisdictions

The best systems provide a broad jurisdictional reach—from federal legislation to state legislative hearings and local government acts. Before committing, confirm whether the platform includes:

  • Federal and state legislation: Bills, amendments, regulations, hearings, and newly introduced bills, with Congress as a key source for federal legislative tracking.
  • Regulatory activity: Notices from agencies and committees.
  • Comprehensive data sources: Congressional records, local archives, and state portals.

Understanding the dynamic nature of Capitol Hill is crucial, as legislative activity and staff turnover at the federal level can significantly impact advocacy strategies and tracking efforts.

If your team must monitor state legislation, check that the vendor’s coverage includes smaller states and municipalities that frequently pass niche regulations.

Real Time Alerts and Notifications

Fast updates are critical for professionals who manage compliance or advocacy campaigns. Strong systems offer:

  • Instant email alerts for bill introductions, amendments, or new hearings.
  • Custom filters for topics, sponsors, committees, or jurisdictions.
  • Real-time dashboards showing where legislation is moving next.
  • Collaboration tools so teams can assign follow-up actions or comments.

With real-time alerts, government affairs professionals and policy experts can respond before deadlines pass—ensuring that organizations stay ahead and fully informed.

Analytics, Reporting, and Insight Generation

Good tracking isn’t just about collecting raw data. It’s about turning that data into useful analysis. A well-built platform helps users:

  • Create trend dashboards showing activity by topic, legislator, or region.
  • Generate reports to brief clients, executives, or advocacy groups.
  • Use artificial intelligence to compare bills, predict movement, or analyze outcomes.
  • Access historical data for longitudinal analysis.

By combining analytics with visualization tools, organizations gain the context needed to make strategic decisions quickly.

Artificial Intelligence in Legislative Tracking

Artificial intelligence transforms how government affairs professionals and government relations teams approach legislative tracking. By harnessing AI, organizations can analyze massive volumes of legislative and regulatory data in real time, ensuring that no critical bill or regulation goes unnoticed. AI-powered tools can automatically identify and prioritize bills that align with an organization’s advocacy goals, generate personalized bill summaries, and even predict the likelihood of legislative movement—all with minimal manual intervention.

For government relations professionals, this means less time spent sifting through raw data and more time focusing on strategy, stakeholder engagement, and influencing policy outcomes. AI-driven platforms can scan every legislative chamber, flagging new bills and regulations that matter most to your organization. These actionable insights empower teams to stay ahead of policy developments, respond quickly to emerging issues, and confidently make strategic decisions. As artificial intelligence continues to evolve, it will play an increasingly vital role in helping professionals track legislation, analyze regulatory trends, and drive effective advocacy across all levels of government.

Ease of Use and Vendor Support

Complex systems often fail because users find them hard to operate. When evaluating tracking software, consider:

  • Intuitive search functions and clear navigation.
  • Vendor training, documentation, and help-desk responsiveness.
  • Implementation timelines and onboarding resources.
  • Integration options with CRM, compliance, or reporting platforms.

The easier the interface, the more likely professionals across departments—legal, advocacy, and communications—will actually use it.

Security and Data Protection

When it comes to legislative tracking, security and data protection are non-negotiable for government affairs professionals and organizations. The sensitive nature of legislative and regulatory data—combined with the need for accurate, up-to-date information—means that robust security measures are essential. Leading legislative tracking platforms employ advanced encryption, secure servers, and strict access controls to ensure that only authorized users can access critical information.

In addition, reputable platforms adhere to industry best practices and compliance standards, safeguarding client data from unauthorized access or breaches. This commitment to security allows government relations professionals to focus on their core strategy and advocacy efforts, knowing that their data is protected at every step. By selecting a platform with proven security protocols, organizations can confidently manage their legislative tracking activities and maintain the trust of stakeholders, clients, and team members.

Integration with Other Tools

For government affairs professionals, efficiency and collaboration are key to successful advocacy. That’s why seamless integration between legislative tracking platforms and other essential tools—such as CRM systems, email clients, and social media monitoring software—is so valuable. Integrated platforms enable government relations professionals to track bills, monitor legislator interactions, and analyze advocacy campaigns all in one place, reducing manual data entry and streamlining workflows.

By connecting legislative tracking with CRM systems, organizations can maintain a comprehensive record of stakeholder engagement, track the progress of key bills, and measure the impact of their advocacy efforts. Integration with communication tools also ensures that teams can quickly share updates, assign tasks, and coordinate responses to legislative developments. Ultimately, these integrations help government affairs teams stay ahead of policy changes, maximize efficiency, and deliver more effective results for their organizations and clients.

Cost, Scalability, and ROI

Pricing varies widely across platforms. Some charge by user, others by jurisdiction. Evaluate:

  • Scalability: Can you expand access as new teams join?
  • Hidden costs: Extra fees for integrations or data exports.
  • ROI: Measure efficiency gains, reduced research hours, and improved regulatory compliance.

The right investment pays for itself through faster tracking, stronger insight, and better policy outcomes.

Building Your Decision-Making Checklist

A structured checklist helps teams evaluate multiple vendors objectively. Consider the following steps:

  1. Define scope: Identify which government levels—federal, state, local—your organization must monitor.
  2. Map stakeholders: Determine which departments, clients, professionals, or legislators need access to legislative tracking information.
  3. Create a scoring system: Rate vendors on coverage, alerts, analytics, ease of use, and cost.
  4. Request demos: Ask vendors to show how their tools track legislation and deliver reports.
  5. Review accuracy: Compare automated alerts to official legislative portals to confirm reliability.
  6. Pilot the system: Run a short test during a legislative session to evaluate performance.

This structured review allows government relations professionals and policy experts to make choices based on measurable evidence, not sales claims.

Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them

Even sophisticated organizations can stumble during implementation. Watch for these frequent errors:

  • Assuming full coverage: Some systems exclude local governments or agency regulations. This can result in missing important government actions, leaving you unaware of key legislative or regulatory developments.
  • Overloading users: Too many irrelevant alerts lead to fatigue.
  • Ignoring integration: Platforms that don’t connect to existing tools reduce efficiency.
  • Underestimating training: Teams may resist new systems without clear onboarding.
  • Skipping metrics: Without KPIs, you can’t analyze ROI or improvement.

Avoiding these issues keeps your strategy grounded in real performance data.

Implementation Best Practices and Maximizing Value

Rolling out a new tracking platform works best when everyone understands the process. Follow these steps:

  • Stakeholder alignment: Engage government affairs, legal, and communications teams early.
  • Define taxonomy: Standardize issue tags, committees, and jurisdiction names.
  • Workflow mapping: Assign ownership for monitoring, escalation, and communication.
  • Training: Offer live sessions and short guides to reinforce adoption.
  • Continuous review: Revisit settings each quarter to refine alerts and search filters.

As policy cycles shift, ongoing optimization ensures that your system remains accurate, relevant, and responsive to regulatory developments.

For additional insight on how legislative and regulatory tools operate, review the NCSL’s bill tracking overview, which explains how professionals track state legislation effectively.

Future of Legislative Tracking

The future of legislative tracking is bright, with rapid advancements in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and data analytics reshaping how government affairs professionals and organizations monitor and influence policy. As the demand for real-time, data-driven insights grows, legislative tracking tools will become even more sophisticated—offering predictive analytics, automated reporting, and deeper integration with other advocacy platforms.

We can expect to see greater adoption of cloud-based solutions, enhanced security features, and more intuitive user interfaces that make it easier for government relations professionals to access and analyze critical information. The integration of legislative tracking with CRM, communication, and analytics tools will provide a unified view of advocacy efforts, enabling teams to coordinate strategy and engage stakeholders more effectively.

As the policy landscape evolves, staying ahead of legislative and regulatory developments will be essential for organizations seeking to influence legislation and achieve their advocacy goals. By embracing the latest technologies and innovations, government affairs professionals can ensure they remain agile, informed, and ready to drive meaningful impact in an ever-changing environment.

Texas Political Spotlight
This is some text inside of a div block.

Welcome back, friends

Texas voters approved one of the largest property tax relief packages in state history on Tuesday, raising the homestead exemption to $140,000 and granting new tax breaks for seniors, people with disabilities, and small businesses. In Austin, residents rejected Proposition Q, a plan to fund public safety, homelessness programs, and city facility initiatives through a property tax hike, forcing city leaders to rework the budget and brace for service cuts. Meanwhile, Bexar County voters narrowly passed Propositions A and B, greenlighting up to $311 million in tourism-funded support for a new downtown Spurs arena and upgrades to the Freeman Coliseum grounds.

We hope you enjoyed today’s read!

Stay connected with TXLege News on X and LinkedIn!

Texas Political Spotlight
This is some text inside of a div block.

Welcome back friends,

Former Vice President Dick Cheney, one of the most influential and controversial figures in modern American politics, has died at 84, remembered by former President George W. Bush as a “patriot” whose intellect and conviction shaped decades of U.S. policy. In Texas, the Education Agency announced a sweeping takeover of Fort Worth ISD, the state’s second-largest intervention, citing years of academic underperformance and plans to install new local managers. And in Washington, a United Airlines flight was evacuated after a bomb threat, prompting an FBI investigation that later found no explosives, allowing operations to resume safely.

We hope you enjoyed today’s read!

Stay connected with TXLege News on X and LinkedIn!