Campaign Finance
05/17/2022

Runoff Candidates Raise More Than $17M for Final Push

TXElects

State candidates facing runoffs were required to file their runoff campaign finance reports yesterday (Monday). These reports disclose contributions received and expenditures made between February 10 and May 14. Most reports were available online today (Tuesday), and we highlight significant reports below.

Statewide

LTGOV (Lean R): Mike Collier (D) out-raised Rep. Michelle Beckley (D-Carrollton), $488K to $12K, and outspent her, $507K to $18K.

AG (Lean R): Land Comm. George P. Bush (R) raised $2.3M, spent $2.8M and has $731K on hand. The report from Atty. Gen. Ken Paxton (R) was not available online. He had $4.7M on hand as of February 19.

Bush’s largest contributors for the period included Dallas energy executive Kelcy Warren ($200K), Copperas Cove executive Jeffery Hilderbrand ($100K), Palm Beach (Fla.) executive Douglas Devos and family members ($80K collectively), Moultrie (Ga.) executive Drayton McLane ($60K), San Antonio investor Jamal Daniel ($50K), Georgetown executive Ray Hunt ($50K), Lewisville executive Ira Mitzner ($50K), Q PAC ($50K), Houston investor Bradley Cross ($40K) and Grand Rapids (Mich.) engineer Greg Bird ($33K).

On the Democratic side, Joe Jaworski narrowly out-raised Rochelle Garza, $373K to $334K, and even more narrowly outspent her, $370K to $366K. He holds a $73K to $37K edge in cash on hand.

LAND open (Likely R): Sen. Dawn Buckingham (R-Lakeway) raised $797K and spent just over $1.0M, both many orders of magnitude over her opponent. On the Democratic side, Jay Kleberg similarly dwarfed his opponent, raising $522K and spending $415K.

RRC (Likely R): Comm. Wayne Christian (R) raised $528K, spent $662K and has $341K on hand. Nearly all of challenger Sarah Stogner’s (R) $2M in contributions came in kind from Houston rancher Ashley Wyatt. She reported no expenditures or cash on hand.

Senate

SD24 open (Likely R): Former Sen. Pete Flores (R-Pleasanton) out-raised Raul Reyes Jr. (R), $500K to $216K, and outspent him, $609K to $238K.

SD27 open (Lean D): Morgan LaMantia (D) out-raised Sara Stapleton-Barrera (D), $265K to $126K, and outspent her, $1.8M to $123K. LaMantia added another $1.3M to her loan balance, bringing it to $2.9M.

House

HD12 (Safe R): Rep. Kyle Kacal (R-College Station) out-raised Ben Bius (R), $463K to $182K, and outspent him, $421K to $276K. Kacal’s largest contributors included Texas Farm Bureau AGFUND ($64K), Texas House Republican Caucus ($35K), Speaker Dade Phelan’s campaign ($33K), Charles Butt Public Education PAC ($25K), Texas Trial Lawyers Assoc. PAC ($25K), Associated Republicans of Texas PAC ($24K) and Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC ($20K).

Bius’s largest contributors were Conservative Action for Texas PAC ($24K), Rep. Mayes Middleton ($20K), Defend Texas Liberty PAC ($14K), The Woodlands executive Anthony George ($10K), Huntsville retirees Charles and Jeanine Tompkins ($10K combined) and College Station executive Ken Watford ($10K).

HD17 open (Safe R): Stan Gerdes (R) out-raised Paul Pape (R), $213K to $32K, and outspent him, $245K to $138K. Gerdes’s largest contributors included Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC ($50K), Texans for Responsible Government PAC ($10K), Energy Transfer Partners Texas PAC ($9K) and Austin lobbyist Ron Lewis ($7.5K). Pape’s largest contributor was Texas Farm Bureau AGFUND ($26K).

HD19 open (Safe R): Ellen Troxclair (R) out-raised Justin Berry, $265K to $165K, and outspent him, $465K to $153K. She holds a $172K to $46K advantage in cash on hand. Troxclair’s largest contributors included Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC ($60K) and its CEO Richard Weekley ($25K), Austin software executive Joe Liemandt ($52K), Austin energy executive Bryan Sheffield ($25K), Austin homebuilder David Dalgleish ($10K) and Texas Assoc. of Realtors TREPAC ($10K).

Berry’s largest contributors were Protect and Serve Texas PAC ($43K), Austin Police Assoc. PAC ($25K) and Charles Butt Public Education PAC ($25K).

HD23 open (Likely R): Terri Leo-Wilson (R) out-raised Patrick Gurski (R), $585K to $295K, solely because of support from Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC, which supplied nearly 94% of her contribution total. Gurski narrowly outspent her, $99K to $82K, but much of TLR’s support essentially has the effect of campaign spending.

Gurski’s largest contributors were Associated Republicans of Texas PAC ($131K), Texans for Responsible Government PAC ($25), Galveston County for Conservative Values PAC ($17K), Galveston Co. Comm. Darrell Apffel’s campaign ($13K) and Galveston Co. Comm. Joe Giusti’s campaign ($13K). Wilson-Leo’s largest contributors were Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC ($548K), Texas Right to Life PAC ($10K) and Defend Texas Liberty PAC ($7K).

HD37 open (Lean D): Luis Villarreal Jr. (D) narrowly out-raised Ruben Cortez (D), $55K to $53K, and outspent him, $112K to $45K.

HD52 open (Lean R): Pat McGuinness (R), who has largely self-funded his campaign, raised $13K and spent $233K. Caroline Harris’s (R) report was not yet available.

HD60 (Safe R): Rep. Glenn Rogers (R-Graford) raised $751K and spent $523K. Mike Olcott’s (R) report was not yet available. Roger’s largest contributors included Speaker Dade Phelan’s campaign ($250K), Texas Assoc. of Realtors TREPAC ($62K), Texas House Republican Caucus PAC ($35K), Aledo realtor Jimmy Martin ($35K), Charles Butt Public Education PAC ($25K), Texas Farm Bureau AGFUND ($25K), Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC ($20K), Veterinarian PAC ($20K), Texas Alliance for Life PAC ($16K) and Associated Republicans of Texas PAC ($15K).

HD61 open (Likely R): Frederick Frazier (R) out-raised Paul Chabot (R), $275K to $31K, and outspent him, $208K to $88K. Frazier’s largest contributors included Associated Republicans of Texas PAC ($50K), Speaker Dade Phelan’s campaign ($36K), Texans for Responsible Government PAC ($15K), Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC ($12.5K) and Charles Butt Public Education PAC ($10K).

HD63 open (Likely R): Ben Bumgarner (R) narrowly out-raised Jeff Younger (R), $268K to $240K, and outspent him, $248K to $79K. Bumgarner’s largest contributors included Associated Republicans of Texas PAC ($80K), Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC ($66K), Speaker Dade Phelan’s campaign ($63K) and Texas Sands PAC ($10K). Younger’s largest contributors were Defend Texas Liberty PAC ($147K), Conservative Action for Texas PAC ($53K), former Sen. Don Huffines ($10K) and Texas Right to Life PAC ($10K).

HD70 open (Toss Up): Jamee Jolly (R) out-raised the largely self-funded Eric Bowlin (R), $273K to $18K, but was outspent, $152K to $96K. On the Democratic side, Cassandra Garcia Hernandez out-raised Miheala Plesa, $118K to $29K, and outspent her, $114K to $67K.

HD73 open (Safe R): Barron Casteel (R) out-raised Carrie Isaac, $422K to $310K, and outspent her, $367K to $256K. Casteel’s largest contributors included Speaker Dade Phelan’s campaign ($100K), Associated Republicans of Texas PAC ($25K), Charles Butt Public Education PAC ($25K), Texans for Responsible Government PAC ($25K), New Braunfels oil and gas executive Josh Price ($20K), New Braunfels executive John Weisman ($20K) and Texas Assoc. of Realtors TREPAC ($17K).

Isaac’s largest contributors were Rep. Mayes Middleton ($100K), Conservatives for Law Enforcement & Border Security PAC ($65K), Canyon Lake retiree Debbie Asbury ($36K), Dripping Springs retiree Robert Seale ($20K), Midland oil and gas executives Don and Jeff Sparks ($20K combined) and College Station conservative activist Kathaleen Wall ($15K).

HD76 open (Likely D): Suleman Lalani (D) out-raised Vanesia Johnson, $91K to $3K, and outspent her, $103K to $3K.

HD84 open (Likely R): Carl Tepper out-raised David Glasheen, $295K to $11K, but the largely self-funded Glasheen vastly outspent Tepper, $924K to $67K. Glasheen loaned himself another $950K, bringing his outstanding loan principal to $1.65M. Tepper’s largest contributors were Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC ($237K) and Texans for Responsible Government PAC ($13K).

HD85 (Safe R): Rep. Phil Stephenson (R-Wharton) raised just $54K – a fraction of the amounts raised by the three other incumbents facing runoffs – and spent $64K. Challenger Stan Kitzman (R) raised $52K and spent $46K.

Stephenson’s largest contributor was Texas House Republican Caucus PAC ($35K). Kitzman’s largest contributors were Houston energy executive Jeffery Hildebrand ($10K), Houston developer Steven Alvis ($5K) and Bellville executive Charles Scianna Jr. ($5K).

Stephenson received, by far, the least amount of support from House leadership and heavy-hitting Republican PACS of any incumbent and was well behind many open-seat candidates. He received no contributions from House colleagues during the period. By contrast, Rep. Stephanie Klick (R-Fort Worth) received $180K from her colleagues not named Phelan and $235K from the Speaker’s campaign account. Rep. Kyle Kacal (R-College Station) received $31K from members not named Phelan and $33K from his campaign. Rep. Glenn Rogers (R-Graford) received $20K from members not named Phelan and $250K from the Speaker.

HD91 (Likely R): Rep. Stephanie Klick (R-Fort Worth) out-raised challenger David Lowe, $955K to $263K, and outspent him, $472K to $53K. She holds a $128K to $6K advantage in cash on hand.

Klick’s largest contributors for the period included Speaker Dade Phelan’s campaign ($235K), Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC ($200K), Texas Alliance for Life PAC ($37K), Rep. Greg Bonnen’s campaign ($35K), Rep. Dustin Burrow’s campaign ($35K), Texas House Republican Caucus PAC ($35K), Protect and Serve Texas PAC ($29K), Texans for Responsible Government PAC ($25K), Texas Nurse Practitioners PAC ($25K), Texas Assoc. of Realtors TREPAC ($20K) and Rep. Gary Gates’s campaign ($15K). Klick received $180K from her colleagues’ campaign funds not including Phelan’s campaign, which added $235K to that total.

Lowe’s largest contributors were Defend Texas Liberty PAC ($165K) and Conservative Action for Texas PAC ($53K). Combined they accounted for 83% of Lowe’s contribution total.

HD93 (Likely R): Laura Hill (R) out-raised Nate Schatzline (R), $404K to $312K, and outspent him, $220K to $124K. Hill’s largest contributors were Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC ($173K), Associated Republicans of Texas PAC ($68K), Speaker Dade Phelan’s campaign ($37K), Argyle retirees Wallace and Margaret Downey ($35K combined), Texas Assoc. of Realtors TREPAC ($25K) and Texans for Responsible Government PAC ($10K).

Schatzline’s largest contributors were Defend Texas Liberty PAC ($165K), Conservative Action for Texas PAC ($32K), Schatzline family members ($25K combined), Rep. Mayes Middleton ($10K), Haslet franchise owner Thomas Hardeman ($10K) and Texas Right to Life PAC ($10K).

HD100 open (Safe D): Venton Jones raised $110K and spent $101K. The report from Sandra Crenshaw (D) was not yet available. Through the primary, she raised $5K and spent less than that.

HD114 open (Safe D): Alexandra Guio (D) out-raised former Rep. John Bryant (D-Dallas), $55K to $33K, but was narrowly outspent, $54K to $46K. Over the election cycle, Guio and Bryant have each raised $124K.

HD122 open (Likely R): Elisa Chan (R) out-raised Mark Dorazio (R), $168K to $110K, and outspent him, $564K to $300K. Chan’s largest contributors for the period were Associated Republicans of Texas PAC ($25K), Speaker Dade Phelan’s campaign ($50K), Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC ($20K), Texans for Responsible Government PAC ($10K). Chan also loaned her campaign an additional $400K, bringing her total outstanding loan balance to $1.6M.

Dorazio’s largest contributors were Boerne retiree Robert Bruce ($12K), Rep. Mayes Middleton ($10K) and Defend Texas Libety PAC ($8.5K). Dorazio loaned his campaign another $200K, bringing his outstanding loan principal to $500K.

HD133 open (Likely R): Mano DeAyala (R) out-raised Shelly Barineau (R), $464K to $292K, and outspent her, $480K to $277K. DeAyala’s largest contributors were Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC ($150K), Associated Republicans of Texas PAC ($42K), Houston retiree David Light III ($25K), Houston executive Alan Hassenflu ($15K), Houston homebuilder Michael Moody ($15K) and Houston homebuilder Richard Weekley ($15K).

Barineau’s largest contributors were Houston retiree Pamela Barineau ($50K), Kenney retiree Dianne Holmes ($40K) Houston nonprofit executive Melinda Hilderbrand ($10K), Houston realtor Allen Crosswell ($10K), Houston retiree Amy Huggins ($10K) and Rep. Mayes Middleton ($10K).

🎙️We Have a Podcast! 🎙️

Bills and Business is your go-to podcast for conversations related to Texas legislation and business. Hosted by Laura Carr, Co-Founder of USLege—an AI-driven legislative tracking software—we bring you in-depth analysis on economic trends, impactful legislation, and key developments shaping Texas business.

Subscribe on Youtube and Spotify for weekly episodes!

🔍 USLege - The Only AI-First Political Tracking Solution ✨

USLege helps you track legislation and find what you need faster from bills, committee hearings, floor debates, and state agency meetings faster.

Say goodbye to tedious tasks!

You can follow USLege on LinkedIn, Facebook, and X.

🤝 Texas Association of Business 📈

Texas Association of Business (TAB) is the Texas State Chamber, representing companies of every size and industry. TAB’s purpose is to champion the best business climate in the world, unleashing the power of free enterprise to enhance lives for generations.

You can follow TAB on LinkedIn, Facebook, and X.

Table of Content
  1. 01 First
Trusted by Government Affairs Professionals and Corporate Policy Teams
Blog & Articles

Read more news

Texas Political Spotlight
This is some text inside of a div block.

Welcome back, friends

Texas is facing a pivotal legal test over its election system as Republicans seek to end open primaries, a move that supporters frame as protecting party autonomy and critics warn could create new barriers to voter participation. At the same time, federal officials are considering a land exchange that would allow SpaceX to expand its South Texas launch site, renewing debate over how to balance economic growth with the preservation of sensitive wildlife habitat along the Gulf Coast. Lastly, a federal judge has blocked a new Texas law regulating children’s access to app stores, underscoring the ongoing uncertainty over how far states can go in policing online safety without infringing on constitutional rights.

We hope you enjoyed today’s read!

Stay connected with TXLege News on X and LinkedIn!

#44 - Hope Osborn: Building Community for Women in Texas Politics with Pink Granite
This is some text inside of a div block.

Welcome to Episode #44 of Bills & Business. In this episode, Laura Carr, Co-Founder of USLege, sits down with Hope Osborn, Co-Founder of The Pink Granite Foundation.

Hope brings more than a decade of experience across the Texas Capitol, having worked in both chambers, both parties, and in the advocacy world. She shares the story behind The Pink Granite Foundation and how it has grown into a nonpartisan force for uplifting, connecting, and supporting women in Texas politics. From its grassroots beginnings to the impact of the 2025 Pink Granite Party, Hope provides an inside look at how the organization strengthens the political ecosystem.

Laura and Hope explore the nonprofit’s mentorship programs, year-round community-building efforts, and the unique pressures women face working under the dome. Hope offers insight into why women’s leadership in politics matters, how to break down persistent barriers, and what the future looks like for the next generation of female leaders in Texas policymaking.

Don’t forget to subscribe to Bills & Business on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and YouTube for more deep dives into Texas policy and business news.

📲 Follow Laura Carr

🐦 Twitter: @Laura_USLege https://x.com/Laura_USLege

💼 LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/laurauslege/

📸 Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/thereallauracarr/

🛍️ ShopMy: https://shopmy.us/shop/lauraluise?Section_title=latest-finds&tab=collections

✍️ Substack: https://lauraluise.substack.com/

🔗 Links: https://lauraluise.carrd.co/

📲 Follow USLege

✨ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/uslege.ai/

📘 Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/USLegeai

🐦 Twitter: @USLege_ai https://x.com/USLege_ai

💼 LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/uslege-ai/

🎧 Subscribe to Bills & Business

🌐 Website: https://www.uslege.ai/

▶️ YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@BillsandBusiness

🎵 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/22ZWg9VVb2AEGqyV14osNi?si=effe3795f8414171

🍎 Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/ph/podcast/bills-and-business-by-uslege/id1781059329

🎥 TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@uslege

📲 Follow Hope Osborn

💼 LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/hopeosborn/

🐦 Twitter: https://x.com/HopeOsbornTX

🎬 Produced by USLege

📞 Want to see USLege in action? Schedule a demo today! https://www.uslege.ai/demo

How to Choose the Right Legislative Bill Tracking Software for Your Organization
This is some text inside of a div block.

Legislative bill tracking software now sits at the center of how modern organizations monitor public policy.

With fast-moving legislation across states and at the federal level, even a single missed update can derail compliance, strategy, and stakeholder communication.

For government affairs, public affairs professionals, and policy professionals, the challenge is no longer finding information.

The real challenge is staying up to date, sorting through massive amounts of data, and acting fast enough to stay ahead of regulatory developments.

Organizations that still rely on manual tracking often miss hearing schedules, committee assignments, and vote movement during an active legislative session.

Those delays lead to rushed analysis, weak talking points, and reduced control over regulatory strategy.

This guide explains how modern legislative and regulatory tracking works, what features matter most, and how to evaluate legislative bill tracking software with confidence.

It also outlines how the right tools help organizations save time, stay informed, and work smarter with fewer resources.

What a Legislative Tracking Platform Actually Does

A legislative tracking platform collects bills, executive orders, and regulatory updates from Congress and state agencies.

It organizes full text, status, hearing schedules, and vote outcomes into a searchable structure.

Instead of searching dozens of sites, users access critical information in a single workspace.

This creates comprehensive coverage across jurisdictions and timeline stages.

Manual Monitoring vs Automated Systems

Manual tracking depends on email newsletters, website checks, spreadsheets, and delayed reports.

Automated tracking legislation systems rely on structured data feeds, continuous search processing, and AI-powered tagging.

This shift allows teams to track bills in real time while reducing reporting lag.

Who Relies on Legislative and Regulatory Tracking Every Day

Government Affairs Teams

Government affairs teams track legislation to advise internal leadership and shape outreach strategy.

They monitor committee hearings, regulatory changes, and voting calendars to anticipate outcomes.

Government Affairs Professionals

Government affairs professionals depend on real-time alerts to prepare briefings, manage stakeholder communication, and coordinate advocacy activity.

Public Affairs Professionals

Public affairs professionals use legislative tracking to stay informed on pending legislation that affects public positioning.

They use alerts, bill summaries, and reports to guide messaging and response timing.

Policy Professionals

Policy professionals analyze regulatory and legislative movement for forecasting and risk modeling.

Core Functions Every System Must Deliver

Real Time Alerts and Notifications

Real-time alerts ensure that no major event is missed.

Users receive status change alerts, hearing alerts, committee movement alerts, and vote alerts.

Many systems also deliver real-time legislative alerts and real-time notifications to multiple team members at once.

Email alerts remain a core communication channel.

Search and Filtering Tools

Strong search features allow users to search by keyword, bill number, sponsor, topic, and date.

Advanced filters allow professionals to track across Congress, agencies, and jurisdictions without manual sorting.

Bill Summaries and Full Text Access

Clear bill summaries help professionals review large volumes of legislation quickly.

Full text access supports detailed analysis when a deeper review is required.

Tracking Across the Full Legislative Process

The legislative process unfolds across many stages.

A strong tracking system follows every phase without delay.

Stages include introduction, committee hearing, committee vote, floor vote, reconciliation, and enactment.

Tracking each stage allows organizations to act with speed and precision.

Why Organizations Struggle Without Proper Tracking

Without reliable legislative tracking, organizations often miss key vote windows and fall behind on regulatory changes.

They lose early access to hearing schedules and waste time on manual legislative research.

Manual tracking also weakens stakeholder engagement and limits the ability to anticipate outcomes.

How AI-Powered Tracking Improves Speed and Accuracy

AI-powered systems classify bills by topic, industry, and risk level.

They reduce noise while increasing signal clarity.

Key AI-powered functions include automated tagging, predictive analysis, sentiment scoring, and impact forecasting.

This allows teams to anticipate policy shifts instead of reacting after passage.

Staying Ahead in Fast-Moving Legislative Environments

Fast-moving legislation often changes direction within days.

Organizations that stay ahead rely on continuous data intake and structured alerts.

To stay ahead consistently, teams must track daily activity, review bill movement, monitor committee assignments, and track hearing schedules.

Teams that do not stay ahead often miss early influence windows.

Jurisdictional Scope and Data Integrity

Federal Level Coverage

Federal-level tracking focuses on Congress, agencies, and executive orders.

These updates guide national strategy and compliance planning.

State and Local Monitoring

State and municipal legislation often moves faster than federal legislation.

Multi-jurisdiction tracking legislation tools allow organizations to track overlapping regulatory exposure while staying fully up to date.

The Role of Data in Modern Bill Monitoring

Data drives every element of tracking software.

It supports alerts, reports, dashboards, and compliance workflows.

Reliable data strengthens legislative analysis, regulatory monitoring, stakeholder analysis, and long-term strategy planning.

Reports, Analysis, and Action Planning

Strong report functions turn raw data into usable insights.

Reports guide leadership decisions at every level of the organization.

Common reports include daily legislative summaries, weekly regulatory reports, stakeholder briefings, and executive updates.

Advanced analysis allows teams to compare date ranges, sponsors, committees, and historical vote behavior.

Supporting Advocacy and Government Relations

Advocacy relies on early awareness and quick response.

Government relations teams depend on tracking to coordinate outreach tools, stakeholder engagement, and talking points.

Legislative tracking strengthens government relations by improving access to bill summaries, hearing schedules, and pending legislation updates.

Real Time Workflow Management

Real-time alerts flow into shared team workflows.

Every alert triggers review, analysis, and response.

Real-time notifications help assign internal owners, trigger review cycles, support rapid response, and prevent missed deadlines.

This structure allows the organization to maintain control under pressure.

Managing Regulatory Risk Through Continuous Monitoring

Regulatory risk increases when organizations track sporadically.

Continuous regulatory tracking reduces exposure by keeping leadership informed of regulatory changes.

Regulatory monitoring supports compliance alignment, internal controls, and audit readiness.

Integration With Internal Systems

Modern tracking software integrates with CRM systems, internal dashboards, compliance platforms, and reporting tools.

This improves access to legislative and regulatory data across the organization while reducing manual data entry.

Search, Review, and Control Functions

Search tools help teams locate relevant bills quickly.

Review workflows to ensure accuracy and relevance.

Control layers protect access across departments.

Key Evaluation Criteria for Selecting a Platform

Usability for Professionals

Professionals require intuitive dashboards, fast search, clear alerts, and low learning curves.

Usability directly impacts adoption and performance.

Customization for Each Organization

Every organization tracks different legislation.

Customization allows industry-specific focus, regional tracking, alert priorities, and tailored reports.

Cost, Spend, and Resource Allocation

Pricing affects total spend.

Automation reduces manual effort and helps teams save time while operating with less time investment.

Team Collaboration and Communication

Tracking systems support collaboration across the full team.

Shared alerts, shared reports, and shared review processes improve transparency and alignment.

Stakeholder Management and Client Communication

Stakeholders expect timely updates.

Clients rely on clear reports to guide compliance and planning.

Tracking platforms support stakeholder trust, client communication, and strategic confidence.

Avoiding Missed Opportunities and Compliance Failures

Organizations without structured tracking often miss hearings, deadlines, amendments, and engagement windows.

Every missed update increases both legal and operational risk.

Staying Informed in High-Volume Legislative Cycles

High-volume legislative sessions demand continuous monitoring.

To stay informed, teams rely on automated alerts, daily reports, and real-time legislative alerts.

Strategic Use of Legislative and Regulatory Tracking

Legislative and regulatory tracking supports long-term policy strategy, compliance planning, advocacy positioning, and organizational risk management.

Using Tracking to Anticipate Policy Shifts

Anticipation depends on trend analysis, sponsor behavior review, historical vote patterns, and committee movement tracking.

These insights help organizations remain one step ahead.

Managing High Bill Volume With Limited Resources

Congress and state legislatures introduce thousands of bills each year.

Tracking software allows organizations to manage this volume with fewer resources and stronger control.

Accuracy, Speed, and Critical Information Flow

Accuracy ensures trust in decisions.

Speed ensures timely action.

Critical information must flow without interruption to all stakeholders.

Supporting Long-Term Strategy With Continuous Data

Continuous data monitoring aligns regulatory planning with business strategy.

It prevents reactive behavior and supports proactive positioning.

Future Direction of Legislative and Regulatory Monitoring

The future is driven by deeper AI-powered analytics, faster real-time alerts, broader data interoperability, and stronger predictive analysis.

These advances will further improve organizational readiness.

Texas Political Spotlight
This is some text inside of a div block.

Welcome back, friends

Texas is facing a pivotal legal test over its election system as Republicans seek to end open primaries, a move that supporters frame as protecting party autonomy and critics warn could create new barriers to voter participation. At the same time, federal officials are considering a land exchange that would allow SpaceX to expand its South Texas launch site, renewing debate over how to balance economic growth with the preservation of sensitive wildlife habitat along the Gulf Coast. Lastly, a federal judge has blocked a new Texas law regulating children’s access to app stores, underscoring the ongoing uncertainty over how far states can go in policing online safety without infringing on constitutional rights.

We hope you enjoyed today’s read!

Stay connected with TXLege News on X and LinkedIn!

Texas Political Spotlight
This is some text inside of a div block.

Welcome back, friends

Michael and Susan Dell’s unprecedented $6.25 billion pledge to expand federal “Trump Accounts” aims to boost long-term savings for 25 million American children. In Lubbock, Texas Tech’s new classroom restrictions on race, gender identity, and sexuality have ignited an immediate clash over academic freedom and curriculum control. And in Northeast Texas, Rep. Gary VanDeaver’s decision not to seek reelection opens a pivotal Republican primary.

We hope you enjoyed today’s read!

Stay connected with TXLege News on X and LinkedIn!

Texas Political Spotlight
This is some text inside of a div block.

Welcome back, friends

Texas voters approved one of the largest property tax relief packages in state history on Tuesday, raising the homestead exemption to $140,000 and granting new tax breaks for seniors, people with disabilities, and small businesses. In Austin, residents rejected Proposition Q, a plan to fund public safety, homelessness programs, and city facility initiatives through a property tax hike, forcing city leaders to rework the budget and brace for service cuts. Meanwhile, Bexar County voters narrowly passed Propositions A and B, greenlighting up to $311 million in tourism-funded support for a new downtown Spurs arena and upgrades to the Freeman Coliseum grounds.

We hope you enjoyed today’s read!

Stay connected with TXLege News on X and LinkedIn!