Campaign Finance
10/30/2018

Key House Race Campaign Finance Results With a Week to Go

TXElects

Opposed state and legislative candidates were required to file 8-day-out campaign finance reports yesterday (Monday). These reports include contributions received and expenditures made between September 28 and October 27. We are in the process of updating our Crib Sheets. Here we focus on key House races. Our look at statewide and Senate races can be found here.

In general, Democratic challengers and open seat candidates’ totals were lackluster given the overall political climate and the strong fundraising efforts of the party’s congressional challengers. Several candidates seeking seats that rate highly on our “index” of potentially flippable seats are underfunded relative to the opportunity. We have previously discussed how money was not necessarily chasing opportunity this cycle, and today’s results do little to change that analysis.

Notable exceptions are John Turner in open HD114, Julie Johnson in HD115 and Gina Calanni in HD132. Turner out-raised Lisa Luby Ryan by nearly $50K, and Calanni out-raised Rep. Mike Schofield (R-Katy) by more than $75K. Johnson was out-raised by Rep. Matt Rinaldi (R-Irving) for the period but has out-raised him over the election cycle. One other exception is Vikki Goodwin in HD47, who raised $200K for the period, $100K less than Rep. Paul Workman (R-Austin). Goodwin’s contribution total was the third highest for a House challenger, trailing only Turner and Johnson. Several other challengers, such as Alex Karjeker in HD129, were not far behind the incumbents, but the incumbents’ contribution totals were relatively low figures for contested seats. Challenger Joe Rosenthal out-raised Rep. Gary Elkins (R-Houston) in HD135, but Rosenthal’s contribution total was just $41K.

Four Democratic seats are highlighted below. In HD107, challenger Deanna Metzger’s contributions were within $1K of Rep. Victoria Neave’s (D-Dallas). In open HD118, former Rep. John Lujan (R-San Antonio) out-raised the Democratic nominee by $16K. All four seats have been won by a Republican this cycle, two of them in part because of low turnout in gubernatorial elections in those districts, and one in part because of low turnout in special elections.

HD45 open: Republican nominee Ken Strange out-raised Democratic challenger Erin Zwiener, $301K to $65K, and outspent her, $53K to $26K. He has a $63K to $29K advantage in cash on hand (COH).

HD47: Rep. Paul Workman (R-Austin) out-raised Democratic challenger Vikki Goodwin, $300K to $200K, and outspent her, $273K to $129K. Workman has a $154K COH advantage. His largest contributors for the period were Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC ($60K), the Gov. Greg Abbott (R) campaign ($53K), Texas House Republican Caucus ($40K), Associated Republicans of Texas PAC ($19K) and the Texas Assoc. of Realtors TREPAC ($10K). Goodwin’s largest contributors were House Democratic Campaign Committee ($108K), Annie’s List ($10K) and Planned Parenthood PAC ($10K).

HD52 open: Republican nominee Cynthia Flores out-raised Democratic challenger James Talarico, $332K to $143K, but was narrowly outspent, $80K to $71K. Flores has a slight COH advantage, $101K to $82K. Flores’s largest contributors for the period were Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC ($150K), Associated Republicans of Texas PAC ($100K) and the Gov. Greg Abbott (R) campaign ($40K). Talarico’s largest contributors were Texans for Insurance Reform PAC ($56K) and the House Democratic Campaign Committee ($23K).

HD102: Rep. Linda Koop (R-Dallas) out-raised Democratic challenger Ana-Maria Ramos, $458K to $69K, and outspent her, $239K to $49K. Ramos holds a narrow COH edge, $61K to $54K.

HD105: Rep. Rodney Anderson (R-Grand Prairie) raised $340K and spent $163K. He has $92K on hand. Democratic challenger Terry Meza’s report was not available. Two years ago, Meza raised $147K and spent $42K during this same period, and she received a $30K contribution a day after the period.

HD107: Rep. Victoria Neave (D-Dallas) barely out-raised Republican challenger Deanna Metzger, $150K to $149K, and was outspent by Metzger, $96K to $78K. Neave has a $155K to $62K COH advantage. Metzger’s largest contributors for the period were Empower Texans PAC ($50K), the Gov. Greg Abbott (R) campaign ($26K), Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC ($21K), Cisco energy executive Dan & Staci Wilks ($20K), Joanne Wilks ($15K) and Texas Right to Life PAC ($12K).

HD108: Rep. Morgan Meyer (R-Dallas) out-raised Democratic challenger Joanna Cattanach, $133K to $89K, and outspent her, $343K to $42K. Meyer has a $201K to $107K COH advantage.

HD112: Rep. Angie Chen Button (R-Garland) out-raised Democratic challenger Brandy Chambers, $201K to $75K, and outspent her, $291K to $36K. Button has a $555K COH advantage.

HD113 open: Republican nominee Jonathan Boos out-raised Democratic challenger Rhetta Bowers, $166K to $97K, and outspent her, $169K to $36K. He holds a $67K to $41K COH advantage.

HD114 open: Democratic nominee John Turner out-raised Republican nominee Lisa Luby Ryan, $312K to $264K, and outspent her, $425K to $383K. Ryan has a $162K to $33K COH advantage. Ryan’s largest contributors for the period included Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC ($103K), the Gov. Greg Abbott (R) campaign ($39K) and Dallas executive Brint Ryan ($10K). Turner’s largest contributors were the campaign of former U.S. Rep. Jim Turner ($100K), Texas Trial Lawyers Assoc. PAC ($75K), Texas Assoc. of Realtors TREPAC ($24K) and the House Democratic Campaign Committee ($17K).

HD115: Rep. Matt Rinaldi (R-Irving) out-raised Democratic challenger Julie Johnson, $382K to $222K, and outspent her, $346K to $198K. Johnson has out-raised Rinaldi, $877K to $823K, over the entire two-year election cycle. She has the COH advantage, $274K to $202K. Both of those figures are high for such a hotly contested House race. Rinaldi’s largest contributors for the period were Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC ($135K), Empower Texans PAC ($45K), Texas Right to Life PAC ($37K), the Gov. Greg Abbott (R) campaign ($30K), Cisco energy executive Farris Wilks ($25K), Irving businessman Larry Causey ($20K) and Cisco energy executive Dan Wilks ($13K). Johnson’s largest contributors were Texas Trial Lawyers Assoc. PAC ($75K), Texans for Insurance Reform ($40K), Dallas attorney Tracy Todd ($20K), Texas House Democratic Committee ($12K) and San Antonio grocer Charles Butt ($10K).

HD117: Rep. Philip Cortez (D-San Antonio) out-raised Republican challenger Michael Berlanga, $106K to $30K, and outspent him, $58K to $2K. Berlanga has less than $1K on hand. His largest contributor was the Gov. Greg Abbott (R) campaign ($28K).

HD118 open: Former Rep. John Lujan (R-San Antonio) out-raised Democratic nominee Leo Pacheco, $39K to $23K, and outspent him, $30K to $13K. Neither has more than $10K on hand. Lujan’s largest contributor was the Gov. Greg Abbott (R) campaign ($22K).

HD121 open: Republican nominee Steve Allison out-raised Democratic challenger Celine Montoya, $77K to $40K, and outspent her, $43K to $19K. He has a $28K to $10K COH advantage.

HD129: Rep. Dennis Paul (R-Webster) narrowly out-raised Democratic challenger Alex Karjeker, $56K to $44K, and even more narrowly outspent him, $48K to $46K. Paul has a nearly $50K COH advantage.

HD132: Democratic challenger Gina Calanni more than doubled up Rep. Mike Schofield (R-Katy), out-raising him, $139K to $61K, and outspending him, $61K to $33K. Schofield has a $135K COH advantage. Calanni’s largest contributors for the period were Houston attorney Jason Webster ($50K), the Houston Trial Lawyers Assoc. 7th Amendment PAC ($38K) and the House Democratic Campaign Committee ($23K).

HD134: Rep. Sarah Davis (R-Houston) out-raised Democratic challenger Allison Sawyer better than 10-to-1, $388K to $36K, and outspent her, $107K to $13K. Davis has a nearly 20-to-1 COH advantage.

HD135: Democratic challenger Joe Rosenthal narrowly out-raised Rep. Gary Elkins (R-Houston), $41K to $39K, but was outspent, $73K to $13K. Elkins has a $334K to $48K COH advantage.

HD136: Rep. Tony Dale (R-Cedar Park) out-raised Democratic challenger John Bucy, $405K to $116K, and outspent him, $198K to $57K. Dale has a $128K to $51K COH advantage. Dale’s largest contributors for the period were Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC ($145K), Associated Republicans of Texas PAC ($73K), the Gov. Greg Abbott (R) campaign ($47K), Texas Assoc. of Realtors TREPAC ($32K) and the Texas House Republican Caucus ($30K). Bucy’s largest contributors were the House Democratic Campaign Committee ($61K) and the campaign of former Rep. Trey Martinez Fischer ($10K).

HD138: Rep. Dwayne Bohac (R-Houston) out-raised Democratic challenger Adam Milasincic nearly 5-to-1, $146K to $30K, and outspent him, $177K to $24K. Bohac has a nearly $150K COH advantage.

HD144: Rep. Mary Ann Perez (D-Houston) out-raised Republican challenger Ruben Villarreal, $64K to $44K. She spent $45K, and his report indicated no expenditures, which may be erroneous. Perez has an $88K to $20K COH advantage. Villarreal’s largest contributors for the period were Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC ($10K), the Gov. Greg Abbott (R) campaign ($6K) and Associated Republicans of Texas PAC ($5K).

©2018 Texas Election Source LLC

🎙️We Have a Podcast! 🎙️

Bills and Business is your go-to podcast for conversations related to Texas legislation and business. Hosted by Laura Carr, Co-Founder of USLege—an AI-driven legislative tracking software—we bring you in-depth analysis on economic trends, impactful legislation, and key developments shaping Texas business.

Subscribe on Youtube and Spotify for weekly episodes!

🔍 USLege - The Only AI-First Political Tracking Solution ✨

USLege helps you track legislation and find what you need faster from bills, committee hearings, floor debates, and state agency meetings faster.

Say goodbye to tedious tasks!

You can follow USLege on LinkedIn, Facebook, and X.

🤝 Texas Association of Business 📈

Texas Association of Business (TAB) is the Texas State Chamber, representing companies of every size and industry. TAB’s purpose is to champion the best business climate in the world, unleashing the power of free enterprise to enhance lives for generations.

You can follow TAB on LinkedIn, Facebook, and X.

Table of Content
  1. 01 First
Trusted by Government Affairs Professionals and Corporate Policy Teams
Blog & Articles

Read more news

How to Choose the Best Federal Legislative Tracking Software for Your Organization
This is some text inside of a div block.

Every year, thousands of bills move through Congress, and without the right tracking system, teams miss critical information that affects compliance, strategy, and advocacy.

Manual tracking creates gaps.

Teams rely on scattered data, delayed alerts, and inconsistent updates, which makes it harder to stay ahead of policy developments.

Modern legislative tracking tools solve this by centralizing legislative and regulatory data, automating bill tracking, and delivering real-time alerts.

They allow organizations to monitor federal legislation, understand the legislative process, and act quickly when changes occur.

In this guide, you’ll learn how to evaluate legislative monitoring platforms, what features matter most, and how policy management solutions help government affairs teams work smarter.

You will also see how to compare tools, avoid mistakes, and choose a system that fits your organization.

After reviewing your current workflow, you can explore a centralized system like federal legislative tracking software

to improve how your team tracks legislation and responds to policy changes.

What Is Federal Legislative Tracking Software?

Federal legislative tracking software is a system that helps organizations track bills, monitor committee hearings, and follow the full legislative process in one place.

It replaces manual spreadsheets with automated tracking, giving users access to accurate and updated data.

Core Functionality Explained

A strong legislative tracking tool provides:

  • Bill tracking across Congress and committees.
  • Real-time alerts when bills move or change.
  • Search tools to filter legislation by keywords or policy areas.
  • Centralized legislative and regulatory data.

Instead of checking multiple sources, users can track bills with just a few clicks.

These systems also:

  • Automate legislative tracking across every legislative session.
  • Provide bill summaries to quickly understand relevance.
  • Deliver alerts when committee hearings or votes are scheduled.
  • Help users stay informed about pending legislation and regulatory changes.

Congress introduces thousands of bills each year.

Without automation, tracking becomes inefficient and error-prone.

Why Organizations Need Legislative Monitoring Platforms

Organizations face constant pressure to monitor federal legislation and regulatory developments.

Missing a policy update can impact compliance, operations, and long-term planning.

Key Use Cases Across Industries

Legislative monitoring platforms support different teams across an organization:

  • Government affairs teams track policy developments and engage with legislators.
  • Public affairs professionals monitor regulatory tracking and advocacy efforts.
  • Legal teams follow regulations and compliance requirements.
  • Corporations track bills that impact stakeholders and clients.

These tools help organizations:

  • Stay ahead of policy changes and regulatory developments.
  • Improve response time with real-time alerts.
  • Support advocacy and government relations strategies.
  • Provide actionable insights for informed decisions.

For example, a public policy manager can monitor policy areas and receive alerts when bills move through committee assignments.

This allows the team to act quickly and ensure their voice is heard during advocacy efforts.

Essential Features to Look For in Policy Management Solutions

Choosing the right legislative tracking tool depends on features that align with your organization and workflow tools.

Real-Time Alerts and Notifications

Real-time alerts are critical for staying informed.

Look for:

  • Alerts for bill movements, amendments, and executive orders.
  • Email alerts and dashboard notifications.
  • Alerts tailored to specific policy areas.

These alerts ensure your team never misses the latest developments.

Advanced Search and Filtering

Search functionality determines how quickly you find relevant results.

Key features include:

  • Keyword-based search across legislative and regulatory data.
  • Filters by committee, sponsor, and legislative session.
  • Ability to track bills across multiple policy areas.

Strong search tools help teams quickly understand what matters.

Data Visualization and Reporting

Advanced reporting turns raw data into useful analysis.

Look for:

  • Legislative dashboards that show trends.
  • Custom reports for stakeholders and clients.
  • Advanced reporting features for deeper analysis.

These features help organizations make informed decisions based on real data.

AI and Predictive Analytics

AI-powered tools are changing how legislative tracking works.

Capabilities include:

  • AI-powered insights that summarize bills.
  • Predictive analysis of policy changes.
  • Detection of trends across legislation.

These tools help policy professionals quickly understand large volumes of data.

Integration Capabilities

Integration improves team collaboration and workflow.

Look for systems that:

  • Connect with CRM and internal workflow tools.
  • Allow teams to assign tasks and share notes.
  • Support team collaboration across departments.

Integration ensures support teams can work together efficiently.

How to Evaluate Federal Legislative Tracking Software

Selecting the right legislative tracking tool requires a clear evaluation process.

Define Your Organization’s Needs

Start by understanding your organization:

  • Size of your team.
  • Type of legislative and regulatory tracking required.
  • Level of engagement in government affairs.

This helps narrow down options.

Compare Features vs Cost

Pricing varies depending on coverage and features.

  • Basic tools may cost around $1,000.
  • Advanced systems can exceed $5,000.

Focus on ROI rather than price alone.

Assess Data Accuracy and Coverage

Accurate data is essential.

Check:

  • Coverage of federal legislation and regulatory data.
  • Frequency of updates from Congress.
  • Quality of bill summaries and analysis.

to understand how legislative information is structured.

User Experience and Support

User experience affects adoption.

Evaluate:

  • Ease of use.
  • Onboarding and support.
  • Ability for teams to collaborate.

A system should help your team work smarter, not harder.

Common Mistakes to Avoid When Choosing Legislative Tracking Systems

Many organizations choose tools without fully evaluating their needs.

Choosing Based on Price Alone

Low-cost tools may lack comprehensive coverage and advanced reporting.

Ignoring Integration Needs

Without integration, workflow tools become disconnected.

Overlooking User Adoption

Complex systems reduce productivity and team collaboration.

Not Testing the Platform

Always request demos or trials.

Testing ensures the tool fits your organization and supports your team.

Key Benefits of Using Federal Legislative Tracking Software

Organizations that adopt legislative tracking tools gain a clear advantage.

Improved Decision-Making

Access to real-time data leads to better analysis and informed decisions.

Time Efficiency

Automation helps teams save time by reducing manual research.

Enhanced Compliance

Tracking regulations and policy changes reduces compliance risks.

Strategic Advantage

Organizations can stay ahead of policy developments and act early.

Benefits include:

  • Faster response to legislation.
  • Better communication with stakeholders.
  • Stronger advocacy and government relations strategies.

Future Trends in Legislative Monitoring Platforms

Legislative tracking continues to evolve with new technology.

AI and Machine Learning Integration

AI-powered systems provide predictive insights and deeper analysis.

Increased Automation

Automation reduces manual tracking and improves efficiency.

Data-Driven Policy Insights

Advanced analytics provide actionable insights into policy changes.

Organizations are shifting toward intelligent platforms that combine data, AI-powered tools, and automation.

How to Implement Legislative Tracking Software Successfully

Implementation determines long-term success.

Onboarding and Training

Train your team to use the system effectively.

Define Monitoring Criteria

Set alerts, keywords, and policy areas to track bills.

Integrate with Existing Systems

Ensure smooth workflow integration and team collaboration.

Proper setup helps organizations maximize value and stay informed.

Texas Political Spotlight
This is some text inside of a div block.

Welcome back, friends

Texas hemp businesses have filed suit to block new state regulations they say effectively ban smokeable hemp products and impose licensing fee increases so steep they could force many businesses to close. Yesterday, the Texas House State Affairs Committee heard testimony on the explosive growth of data centers in the state, with interconnection requests on the power grid now exceeding 400,000 megawatts and raising questions about cost, reliability, and water usage. Lastly, nineteen Texas summer camps are challenging a new state mandate requiring them to install fiber optic internet infrastructure, citing costs as high as $1.2 million and arguing the requirement is unworkable for rural properties and does nothing to improve camper safety.

Before you dive in…

USLege will be hosting our first ever Best in Government Affairs Awards Ceremony on April 23rd at Speakeasy in Downtown Austin.

Winners and guests will be treated to evening of celebration for the accomplishments in the 89th Texas Legislative Session.

You can expect music, networking, food & drinks and formal award acceptance.  

This is going to be a fun party! We hope to see you there.

»» RSVP HERE: Best in Government Affairs Awards Ceremony hosted by USLege

»» Watch Representative Ken King’s Intro Here ««

We hope you enjoyed today’s read!

Stay connected with TXLege News on X and LinkedIn!

Texas Political Spotlight
This is some text inside of a div block.

Welcome back, friends

A federal trial is underway in Texas over whether the state's prison system has done enough to protect inmates from extreme heat, with a price tag of $1.5 billion standing at the center of the debate. Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows has tasked a new legislative committee with studying whether Texas could absorb one or more counties from New Mexico, a long-shot proposal that has already drawn a sharp response from the neighboring state's governor. A public feud between Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and acting Comptroller Kelly Hancock has spilled into federal court, where a judge is overseeing the fallout in a lawsuit alleging religious discrimination in the state's $1 billion ESA Program.

We hope you enjoyed today’s read!

Stay connected with TXLege News on X and LinkedIn!

Texas Political Spotlight
This is some text inside of a div block.

Welcome back, friends

Texas hemp businesses have filed suit to block new state regulations they say effectively ban smokeable hemp products and impose licensing fee increases so steep they could force many businesses to close. Yesterday, the Texas House State Affairs Committee heard testimony on the explosive growth of data centers in the state, with interconnection requests on the power grid now exceeding 400,000 megawatts and raising questions about cost, reliability, and water usage. Lastly, nineteen Texas summer camps are challenging a new state mandate requiring them to install fiber optic internet infrastructure, citing costs as high as $1.2 million and arguing the requirement is unworkable for rural properties and does nothing to improve camper safety.

Before you dive in…

USLege will be hosting our first ever Best in Government Affairs Awards Ceremony on April 23rd at Speakeasy in Downtown Austin.

Winners and guests will be treated to evening of celebration for the accomplishments in the 89th Texas Legislative Session.

You can expect music, networking, food & drinks and formal award acceptance.  

This is going to be a fun party! We hope to see you there.

»» RSVP HERE: Best in Government Affairs Awards Ceremony hosted by USLege

»» Watch Representative Ken King’s Intro Here ««

We hope you enjoyed today’s read!

Stay connected with TXLege News on X and LinkedIn!

Texas Political Spotlight
This is some text inside of a div block.

Welcome back, friends

A federal trial is underway in Texas over whether the state's prison system has done enough to protect inmates from extreme heat, with a price tag of $1.5 billion standing at the center of the debate. Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows has tasked a new legislative committee with studying whether Texas could absorb one or more counties from New Mexico, a long-shot proposal that has already drawn a sharp response from the neighboring state's governor. A public feud between Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and acting Comptroller Kelly Hancock has spilled into federal court, where a judge is overseeing the fallout in a lawsuit alleging religious discrimination in the state's $1 billion ESA Program.

We hope you enjoyed today’s read!

Stay connected with TXLege News on X and LinkedIn!

Texas Political Spotlight
This is some text inside of a div block.

Welcome back, friends

New Texas rules on hemp-derived THC products take effect March 31, reshaping what can be sold, who can sell it and how the industry operates, with major implications for businesses, consumers and enforcement across the state. Lt. Gov Dan Patrick has unveiled the Texas Senate committee lineup. At the same time, state education leaders are moving to revise curriculum guidance tied to Cesar Chavez amid emerging allegations, prompting immediate changes in classrooms and raising broader questions about how schools respond when historical narratives shift.

»»» View official press release from Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick Here «««

We hope you enjoyed today’s read!

Stay connected with TXLege News on X and LinkedIn!