Campaign Finance
10/30/2018

Key House Race Campaign Finance Results With a Week to Go

TXElects

Opposed state and legislative candidates were required to file 8-day-out campaign finance reports yesterday (Monday). These reports include contributions received and expenditures made between September 28 and October 27. We are in the process of updating our Crib Sheets. Here we focus on key House races. Our look at statewide and Senate races can be found here.

In general, Democratic challengers and open seat candidates’ totals were lackluster given the overall political climate and the strong fundraising efforts of the party’s congressional challengers. Several candidates seeking seats that rate highly on our “index” of potentially flippable seats are underfunded relative to the opportunity. We have previously discussed how money was not necessarily chasing opportunity this cycle, and today’s results do little to change that analysis.

Notable exceptions are John Turner in open HD114, Julie Johnson in HD115 and Gina Calanni in HD132. Turner out-raised Lisa Luby Ryan by nearly $50K, and Calanni out-raised Rep. Mike Schofield (R-Katy) by more than $75K. Johnson was out-raised by Rep. Matt Rinaldi (R-Irving) for the period but has out-raised him over the election cycle. One other exception is Vikki Goodwin in HD47, who raised $200K for the period, $100K less than Rep. Paul Workman (R-Austin). Goodwin’s contribution total was the third highest for a House challenger, trailing only Turner and Johnson. Several other challengers, such as Alex Karjeker in HD129, were not far behind the incumbents, but the incumbents’ contribution totals were relatively low figures for contested seats. Challenger Joe Rosenthal out-raised Rep. Gary Elkins (R-Houston) in HD135, but Rosenthal’s contribution total was just $41K.

Four Democratic seats are highlighted below. In HD107, challenger Deanna Metzger’s contributions were within $1K of Rep. Victoria Neave’s (D-Dallas). In open HD118, former Rep. John Lujan (R-San Antonio) out-raised the Democratic nominee by $16K. All four seats have been won by a Republican this cycle, two of them in part because of low turnout in gubernatorial elections in those districts, and one in part because of low turnout in special elections.

HD45 open: Republican nominee Ken Strange out-raised Democratic challenger Erin Zwiener, $301K to $65K, and outspent her, $53K to $26K. He has a $63K to $29K advantage in cash on hand (COH).

HD47: Rep. Paul Workman (R-Austin) out-raised Democratic challenger Vikki Goodwin, $300K to $200K, and outspent her, $273K to $129K. Workman has a $154K COH advantage. His largest contributors for the period were Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC ($60K), the Gov. Greg Abbott (R) campaign ($53K), Texas House Republican Caucus ($40K), Associated Republicans of Texas PAC ($19K) and the Texas Assoc. of Realtors TREPAC ($10K). Goodwin’s largest contributors were House Democratic Campaign Committee ($108K), Annie’s List ($10K) and Planned Parenthood PAC ($10K).

HD52 open: Republican nominee Cynthia Flores out-raised Democratic challenger James Talarico, $332K to $143K, but was narrowly outspent, $80K to $71K. Flores has a slight COH advantage, $101K to $82K. Flores’s largest contributors for the period were Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC ($150K), Associated Republicans of Texas PAC ($100K) and the Gov. Greg Abbott (R) campaign ($40K). Talarico’s largest contributors were Texans for Insurance Reform PAC ($56K) and the House Democratic Campaign Committee ($23K).

HD102: Rep. Linda Koop (R-Dallas) out-raised Democratic challenger Ana-Maria Ramos, $458K to $69K, and outspent her, $239K to $49K. Ramos holds a narrow COH edge, $61K to $54K.

HD105: Rep. Rodney Anderson (R-Grand Prairie) raised $340K and spent $163K. He has $92K on hand. Democratic challenger Terry Meza’s report was not available. Two years ago, Meza raised $147K and spent $42K during this same period, and she received a $30K contribution a day after the period.

HD107: Rep. Victoria Neave (D-Dallas) barely out-raised Republican challenger Deanna Metzger, $150K to $149K, and was outspent by Metzger, $96K to $78K. Neave has a $155K to $62K COH advantage. Metzger’s largest contributors for the period were Empower Texans PAC ($50K), the Gov. Greg Abbott (R) campaign ($26K), Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC ($21K), Cisco energy executive Dan & Staci Wilks ($20K), Joanne Wilks ($15K) and Texas Right to Life PAC ($12K).

HD108: Rep. Morgan Meyer (R-Dallas) out-raised Democratic challenger Joanna Cattanach, $133K to $89K, and outspent her, $343K to $42K. Meyer has a $201K to $107K COH advantage.

HD112: Rep. Angie Chen Button (R-Garland) out-raised Democratic challenger Brandy Chambers, $201K to $75K, and outspent her, $291K to $36K. Button has a $555K COH advantage.

HD113 open: Republican nominee Jonathan Boos out-raised Democratic challenger Rhetta Bowers, $166K to $97K, and outspent her, $169K to $36K. He holds a $67K to $41K COH advantage.

HD114 open: Democratic nominee John Turner out-raised Republican nominee Lisa Luby Ryan, $312K to $264K, and outspent her, $425K to $383K. Ryan has a $162K to $33K COH advantage. Ryan’s largest contributors for the period included Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC ($103K), the Gov. Greg Abbott (R) campaign ($39K) and Dallas executive Brint Ryan ($10K). Turner’s largest contributors were the campaign of former U.S. Rep. Jim Turner ($100K), Texas Trial Lawyers Assoc. PAC ($75K), Texas Assoc. of Realtors TREPAC ($24K) and the House Democratic Campaign Committee ($17K).

HD115: Rep. Matt Rinaldi (R-Irving) out-raised Democratic challenger Julie Johnson, $382K to $222K, and outspent her, $346K to $198K. Johnson has out-raised Rinaldi, $877K to $823K, over the entire two-year election cycle. She has the COH advantage, $274K to $202K. Both of those figures are high for such a hotly contested House race. Rinaldi’s largest contributors for the period were Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC ($135K), Empower Texans PAC ($45K), Texas Right to Life PAC ($37K), the Gov. Greg Abbott (R) campaign ($30K), Cisco energy executive Farris Wilks ($25K), Irving businessman Larry Causey ($20K) and Cisco energy executive Dan Wilks ($13K). Johnson’s largest contributors were Texas Trial Lawyers Assoc. PAC ($75K), Texans for Insurance Reform ($40K), Dallas attorney Tracy Todd ($20K), Texas House Democratic Committee ($12K) and San Antonio grocer Charles Butt ($10K).

HD117: Rep. Philip Cortez (D-San Antonio) out-raised Republican challenger Michael Berlanga, $106K to $30K, and outspent him, $58K to $2K. Berlanga has less than $1K on hand. His largest contributor was the Gov. Greg Abbott (R) campaign ($28K).

HD118 open: Former Rep. John Lujan (R-San Antonio) out-raised Democratic nominee Leo Pacheco, $39K to $23K, and outspent him, $30K to $13K. Neither has more than $10K on hand. Lujan’s largest contributor was the Gov. Greg Abbott (R) campaign ($22K).

HD121 open: Republican nominee Steve Allison out-raised Democratic challenger Celine Montoya, $77K to $40K, and outspent her, $43K to $19K. He has a $28K to $10K COH advantage.

HD129: Rep. Dennis Paul (R-Webster) narrowly out-raised Democratic challenger Alex Karjeker, $56K to $44K, and even more narrowly outspent him, $48K to $46K. Paul has a nearly $50K COH advantage.

HD132: Democratic challenger Gina Calanni more than doubled up Rep. Mike Schofield (R-Katy), out-raising him, $139K to $61K, and outspending him, $61K to $33K. Schofield has a $135K COH advantage. Calanni’s largest contributors for the period were Houston attorney Jason Webster ($50K), the Houston Trial Lawyers Assoc. 7th Amendment PAC ($38K) and the House Democratic Campaign Committee ($23K).

HD134: Rep. Sarah Davis (R-Houston) out-raised Democratic challenger Allison Sawyer better than 10-to-1, $388K to $36K, and outspent her, $107K to $13K. Davis has a nearly 20-to-1 COH advantage.

HD135: Democratic challenger Joe Rosenthal narrowly out-raised Rep. Gary Elkins (R-Houston), $41K to $39K, but was outspent, $73K to $13K. Elkins has a $334K to $48K COH advantage.

HD136: Rep. Tony Dale (R-Cedar Park) out-raised Democratic challenger John Bucy, $405K to $116K, and outspent him, $198K to $57K. Dale has a $128K to $51K COH advantage. Dale’s largest contributors for the period were Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC ($145K), Associated Republicans of Texas PAC ($73K), the Gov. Greg Abbott (R) campaign ($47K), Texas Assoc. of Realtors TREPAC ($32K) and the Texas House Republican Caucus ($30K). Bucy’s largest contributors were the House Democratic Campaign Committee ($61K) and the campaign of former Rep. Trey Martinez Fischer ($10K).

HD138: Rep. Dwayne Bohac (R-Houston) out-raised Democratic challenger Adam Milasincic nearly 5-to-1, $146K to $30K, and outspent him, $177K to $24K. Bohac has a nearly $150K COH advantage.

HD144: Rep. Mary Ann Perez (D-Houston) out-raised Republican challenger Ruben Villarreal, $64K to $44K. She spent $45K, and his report indicated no expenditures, which may be erroneous. Perez has an $88K to $20K COH advantage. Villarreal’s largest contributors for the period were Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC ($10K), the Gov. Greg Abbott (R) campaign ($6K) and Associated Republicans of Texas PAC ($5K).

©2018 Texas Election Source LLC

🎙️We Have a Podcast! 🎙️

Bills and Business is your go-to podcast for conversations related to Texas legislation and business. Hosted by Laura Carr, Co-Founder of USLege—an AI-driven legislative tracking software—we bring you in-depth analysis on economic trends, impactful legislation, and key developments shaping Texas business.

Subscribe on Youtube and Spotify for weekly episodes!

🔍 USLege - The Only AI-First Political Tracking Solution ✨

USLege helps you track legislation and find what you need faster from bills, committee hearings, floor debates, and state agency meetings faster.

Say goodbye to tedious tasks!

You can follow USLege on LinkedIn, Facebook, and X.

🤝 Texas Association of Business 📈

Texas Association of Business (TAB) is the Texas State Chamber, representing companies of every size and industry. TAB’s purpose is to champion the best business climate in the world, unleashing the power of free enterprise to enhance lives for generations.

You can follow TAB on LinkedIn, Facebook, and X.

Table of Content
  1. 01 First
Trusted by Government Affairs Professionals and Corporate Policy Teams
Blog & Articles

Read more news

Texas Political Spotlight
This is some text inside of a div block.

Welcome back, friends

Texas is facing a pivotal legal test over its election system as Republicans seek to end open primaries, a move that supporters frame as protecting party autonomy and critics warn could create new barriers to voter participation. At the same time, federal officials are considering a land exchange that would allow SpaceX to expand its South Texas launch site, renewing debate over how to balance economic growth with the preservation of sensitive wildlife habitat along the Gulf Coast. Lastly, a federal judge has blocked a new Texas law regulating children’s access to app stores, underscoring the ongoing uncertainty over how far states can go in policing online safety without infringing on constitutional rights.

We hope you enjoyed today’s read!

Stay connected with TXLege News on X and LinkedIn!

#44 - Hope Osborn: Building Community for Women in Texas Politics with Pink Granite
This is some text inside of a div block.

Welcome to Episode #44 of Bills & Business. In this episode, Laura Carr, Co-Founder of USLege, sits down with Hope Osborn, Co-Founder of The Pink Granite Foundation.

Hope brings more than a decade of experience across the Texas Capitol, having worked in both chambers, both parties, and in the advocacy world. She shares the story behind The Pink Granite Foundation and how it has grown into a nonpartisan force for uplifting, connecting, and supporting women in Texas politics. From its grassroots beginnings to the impact of the 2025 Pink Granite Party, Hope provides an inside look at how the organization strengthens the political ecosystem.

Laura and Hope explore the nonprofit’s mentorship programs, year-round community-building efforts, and the unique pressures women face working under the dome. Hope offers insight into why women’s leadership in politics matters, how to break down persistent barriers, and what the future looks like for the next generation of female leaders in Texas policymaking.

Don’t forget to subscribe to Bills & Business on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and YouTube for more deep dives into Texas policy and business news.

📲 Follow Laura Carr

🐦 Twitter: @Laura_USLege https://x.com/Laura_USLege

💼 LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/laurauslege/

📸 Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/thereallauracarr/

🛍️ ShopMy: https://shopmy.us/shop/lauraluise?Section_title=latest-finds&tab=collections

✍️ Substack: https://lauraluise.substack.com/

🔗 Links: https://lauraluise.carrd.co/

📲 Follow USLege

✨ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/uslege.ai/

📘 Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/USLegeai

🐦 Twitter: @USLege_ai https://x.com/USLege_ai

💼 LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/uslege-ai/

🎧 Subscribe to Bills & Business

🌐 Website: https://www.uslege.ai/

▶️ YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@BillsandBusiness

🎵 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/22ZWg9VVb2AEGqyV14osNi?si=effe3795f8414171

🍎 Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/ph/podcast/bills-and-business-by-uslege/id1781059329

🎥 TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@uslege

📲 Follow Hope Osborn

💼 LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/hopeosborn/

🐦 Twitter: https://x.com/HopeOsbornTX

🎬 Produced by USLege

📞 Want to see USLege in action? Schedule a demo today! https://www.uslege.ai/demo

How to Choose the Right Legislative Bill Tracking Software for Your Organization
This is some text inside of a div block.

Legislative bill tracking software now sits at the center of how modern organizations monitor public policy.

With fast-moving legislation across states and at the federal level, even a single missed update can derail compliance, strategy, and stakeholder communication.

For government affairs, public affairs professionals, and policy professionals, the challenge is no longer finding information.

The real challenge is staying up to date, sorting through massive amounts of data, and acting fast enough to stay ahead of regulatory developments.

Organizations that still rely on manual tracking often miss hearing schedules, committee assignments, and vote movement during an active legislative session.

Those delays lead to rushed analysis, weak talking points, and reduced control over regulatory strategy.

This guide explains how modern legislative and regulatory tracking works, what features matter most, and how to evaluate legislative bill tracking software with confidence.

It also outlines how the right tools help organizations save time, stay informed, and work smarter with fewer resources.

What a Legislative Tracking Platform Actually Does

A legislative tracking platform collects bills, executive orders, and regulatory updates from Congress and state agencies.

It organizes full text, status, hearing schedules, and vote outcomes into a searchable structure.

Instead of searching dozens of sites, users access critical information in a single workspace.

This creates comprehensive coverage across jurisdictions and timeline stages.

Manual Monitoring vs Automated Systems

Manual tracking depends on email newsletters, website checks, spreadsheets, and delayed reports.

Automated tracking legislation systems rely on structured data feeds, continuous search processing, and AI-powered tagging.

This shift allows teams to track bills in real time while reducing reporting lag.

Who Relies on Legislative and Regulatory Tracking Every Day

Government Affairs Teams

Government affairs teams track legislation to advise internal leadership and shape outreach strategy.

They monitor committee hearings, regulatory changes, and voting calendars to anticipate outcomes.

Government Affairs Professionals

Government affairs professionals depend on real-time alerts to prepare briefings, manage stakeholder communication, and coordinate advocacy activity.

Public Affairs Professionals

Public affairs professionals use legislative tracking to stay informed on pending legislation that affects public positioning.

They use alerts, bill summaries, and reports to guide messaging and response timing.

Policy Professionals

Policy professionals analyze regulatory and legislative movement for forecasting and risk modeling.

Core Functions Every System Must Deliver

Real Time Alerts and Notifications

Real-time alerts ensure that no major event is missed.

Users receive status change alerts, hearing alerts, committee movement alerts, and vote alerts.

Many systems also deliver real-time legislative alerts and real-time notifications to multiple team members at once.

Email alerts remain a core communication channel.

Search and Filtering Tools

Strong search features allow users to search by keyword, bill number, sponsor, topic, and date.

Advanced filters allow professionals to track across Congress, agencies, and jurisdictions without manual sorting.

Bill Summaries and Full Text Access

Clear bill summaries help professionals review large volumes of legislation quickly.

Full text access supports detailed analysis when a deeper review is required.

Tracking Across the Full Legislative Process

The legislative process unfolds across many stages.

A strong tracking system follows every phase without delay.

Stages include introduction, committee hearing, committee vote, floor vote, reconciliation, and enactment.

Tracking each stage allows organizations to act with speed and precision.

Why Organizations Struggle Without Proper Tracking

Without reliable legislative tracking, organizations often miss key vote windows and fall behind on regulatory changes.

They lose early access to hearing schedules and waste time on manual legislative research.

Manual tracking also weakens stakeholder engagement and limits the ability to anticipate outcomes.

How AI-Powered Tracking Improves Speed and Accuracy

AI-powered systems classify bills by topic, industry, and risk level.

They reduce noise while increasing signal clarity.

Key AI-powered functions include automated tagging, predictive analysis, sentiment scoring, and impact forecasting.

This allows teams to anticipate policy shifts instead of reacting after passage.

Staying Ahead in Fast-Moving Legislative Environments

Fast-moving legislation often changes direction within days.

Organizations that stay ahead rely on continuous data intake and structured alerts.

To stay ahead consistently, teams must track daily activity, review bill movement, monitor committee assignments, and track hearing schedules.

Teams that do not stay ahead often miss early influence windows.

Jurisdictional Scope and Data Integrity

Federal Level Coverage

Federal-level tracking focuses on Congress, agencies, and executive orders.

These updates guide national strategy and compliance planning.

State and Local Monitoring

State and municipal legislation often moves faster than federal legislation.

Multi-jurisdiction tracking legislation tools allow organizations to track overlapping regulatory exposure while staying fully up to date.

The Role of Data in Modern Bill Monitoring

Data drives every element of tracking software.

It supports alerts, reports, dashboards, and compliance workflows.

Reliable data strengthens legislative analysis, regulatory monitoring, stakeholder analysis, and long-term strategy planning.

Reports, Analysis, and Action Planning

Strong report functions turn raw data into usable insights.

Reports guide leadership decisions at every level of the organization.

Common reports include daily legislative summaries, weekly regulatory reports, stakeholder briefings, and executive updates.

Advanced analysis allows teams to compare date ranges, sponsors, committees, and historical vote behavior.

Supporting Advocacy and Government Relations

Advocacy relies on early awareness and quick response.

Government relations teams depend on tracking to coordinate outreach tools, stakeholder engagement, and talking points.

Legislative tracking strengthens government relations by improving access to bill summaries, hearing schedules, and pending legislation updates.

Real Time Workflow Management

Real-time alerts flow into shared team workflows.

Every alert triggers review, analysis, and response.

Real-time notifications help assign internal owners, trigger review cycles, support rapid response, and prevent missed deadlines.

This structure allows the organization to maintain control under pressure.

Managing Regulatory Risk Through Continuous Monitoring

Regulatory risk increases when organizations track sporadically.

Continuous regulatory tracking reduces exposure by keeping leadership informed of regulatory changes.

Regulatory monitoring supports compliance alignment, internal controls, and audit readiness.

Integration With Internal Systems

Modern tracking software integrates with CRM systems, internal dashboards, compliance platforms, and reporting tools.

This improves access to legislative and regulatory data across the organization while reducing manual data entry.

Search, Review, and Control Functions

Search tools help teams locate relevant bills quickly.

Review workflows to ensure accuracy and relevance.

Control layers protect access across departments.

Key Evaluation Criteria for Selecting a Platform

Usability for Professionals

Professionals require intuitive dashboards, fast search, clear alerts, and low learning curves.

Usability directly impacts adoption and performance.

Customization for Each Organization

Every organization tracks different legislation.

Customization allows industry-specific focus, regional tracking, alert priorities, and tailored reports.

Cost, Spend, and Resource Allocation

Pricing affects total spend.

Automation reduces manual effort and helps teams save time while operating with less time investment.

Team Collaboration and Communication

Tracking systems support collaboration across the full team.

Shared alerts, shared reports, and shared review processes improve transparency and alignment.

Stakeholder Management and Client Communication

Stakeholders expect timely updates.

Clients rely on clear reports to guide compliance and planning.

Tracking platforms support stakeholder trust, client communication, and strategic confidence.

Avoiding Missed Opportunities and Compliance Failures

Organizations without structured tracking often miss hearings, deadlines, amendments, and engagement windows.

Every missed update increases both legal and operational risk.

Staying Informed in High-Volume Legislative Cycles

High-volume legislative sessions demand continuous monitoring.

To stay informed, teams rely on automated alerts, daily reports, and real-time legislative alerts.

Strategic Use of Legislative and Regulatory Tracking

Legislative and regulatory tracking supports long-term policy strategy, compliance planning, advocacy positioning, and organizational risk management.

Using Tracking to Anticipate Policy Shifts

Anticipation depends on trend analysis, sponsor behavior review, historical vote patterns, and committee movement tracking.

These insights help organizations remain one step ahead.

Managing High Bill Volume With Limited Resources

Congress and state legislatures introduce thousands of bills each year.

Tracking software allows organizations to manage this volume with fewer resources and stronger control.

Accuracy, Speed, and Critical Information Flow

Accuracy ensures trust in decisions.

Speed ensures timely action.

Critical information must flow without interruption to all stakeholders.

Supporting Long-Term Strategy With Continuous Data

Continuous data monitoring aligns regulatory planning with business strategy.

It prevents reactive behavior and supports proactive positioning.

Future Direction of Legislative and Regulatory Monitoring

The future is driven by deeper AI-powered analytics, faster real-time alerts, broader data interoperability, and stronger predictive analysis.

These advances will further improve organizational readiness.

Texas Political Spotlight
This is some text inside of a div block.

Welcome back, friends

Texas is facing a pivotal legal test over its election system as Republicans seek to end open primaries, a move that supporters frame as protecting party autonomy and critics warn could create new barriers to voter participation. At the same time, federal officials are considering a land exchange that would allow SpaceX to expand its South Texas launch site, renewing debate over how to balance economic growth with the preservation of sensitive wildlife habitat along the Gulf Coast. Lastly, a federal judge has blocked a new Texas law regulating children’s access to app stores, underscoring the ongoing uncertainty over how far states can go in policing online safety without infringing on constitutional rights.

We hope you enjoyed today’s read!

Stay connected with TXLege News on X and LinkedIn!

Texas Political Spotlight
This is some text inside of a div block.

Welcome back, friends

Michael and Susan Dell’s unprecedented $6.25 billion pledge to expand federal “Trump Accounts” aims to boost long-term savings for 25 million American children. In Lubbock, Texas Tech’s new classroom restrictions on race, gender identity, and sexuality have ignited an immediate clash over academic freedom and curriculum control. And in Northeast Texas, Rep. Gary VanDeaver’s decision not to seek reelection opens a pivotal Republican primary.

We hope you enjoyed today’s read!

Stay connected with TXLege News on X and LinkedIn!

Texas Political Spotlight
This is some text inside of a div block.

Welcome back, friends

Texas voters approved one of the largest property tax relief packages in state history on Tuesday, raising the homestead exemption to $140,000 and granting new tax breaks for seniors, people with disabilities, and small businesses. In Austin, residents rejected Proposition Q, a plan to fund public safety, homelessness programs, and city facility initiatives through a property tax hike, forcing city leaders to rework the budget and brace for service cuts. Meanwhile, Bexar County voters narrowly passed Propositions A and B, greenlighting up to $311 million in tourism-funded support for a new downtown Spurs arena and upgrades to the Freeman Coliseum grounds.

We hope you enjoyed today’s read!

Stay connected with TXLege News on X and LinkedIn!