Race Ratings
10/25/2021

Just 6% of Districts are Competitive in Our Initial Race Ratings

TXElects

Texas is a whole lot less competitive state than a year ago.

After the Legislature drew new maps for itself and the Congress, only 13 districts (6%) are rated as “Toss Ups” (4), “Lean Republican” (5) or “Lean Democrat” (4) in our initial Race Ratings for the 2022 general election. There were 38 such districts in our initial 2020 ratings, and that figure excluded six competitive Senate districts that were not on the ballot.

We rate seats based on a seven-point scale from Safe Republican to Safe Democrat based on our formulas for calculating how much redder or bluer a district is than the state as a whole. Our initial ratings are based on the new districts’ partisan lean calculated solely using the 2020 general election results as though the new districts were in effect. We will incorporate recent shifts in the districts’ partisan leans by analyzing election data back to at least 2012 – in some districts as far back as 2002 – to detect longer-term trends. We will eventually incorporate estimates for statewide candidates’ performance, measured head-to-head against the other major party’s nominee, and then “float” the districts above or below that percentage based on past history, recent trends and the incumbent’s tendency to over- or under-perform their party’s candidates. Those calculations will begin after the primary elections. Our initial ratings capture the partisan lean at a single moment of time: November 2020.

Based on these initial ratings, we have projected the partisan makeup of the Legislature and Congressional delegation without any regard to who may be running for any of the offices, with three exceptions which we will note below.

Statewide

Republican candidates have won every statewide race since 1996, and the 2020 election results suggest that streak will easily continue through 2022. Based on our criteria, all statewide races would be rated as Likely Republican.

That said, we moved the LTGOV and AG races to Lean Republican based on the relatively close elections those two incumbents had in 2018. A lack of marquee Democratic candidates for any of the statewide offices does not move the needles any further.

Legislature

All 31 Senate seats are on the ballot in 2022. Nearly all of them will be settled following the primary elections.

Only SD27 receives a competitive rating: Lean Democrat. A dozen seats are rated Likely Republican, and seven more are Safe Republican. Three seats are rated Likely Democrat, and eight are rated Safe Democrat.

In the House, 84 of the chamber’s 150 seats are rated safe for one party or the other – 45 Safe Republican and 39 Safe Democrat. Just nine seats are rated as competitive, and one of those is purely because of the incumbent’s historic over-performance relative to the rest of his party.

Rep. Ryan Guillen’s (D-Rio Grande City) HD31 as drawn is a Likely Republican district, but Guillen in 2020 fared 11.7 points better than the average Democrat running on the ballot with him. We shift the seat to Lean Republican accordingly, and further analysis may move it again to Toss Up.

The other three seats rated Lean Republican are open HD52 in Williamson Co.; HD54, the Bell Co. doughnut district held by Rep. Brad Buckley (R-Salado); and Rep. Angie Chen Button’s (R-Garland) HD112, one of two Republican-held districts remaining in Dallas Co.

Ongoing shifts in partisan lean among Hispanic/Latino voters place South Texas districts HD80, held by Rep. Tracy King (D-Batesville), and open HD118 in Bexar Co. into the Toss Up category. A special runoff election November 2 will give HD118 an incumbent, and, if it’s former Rep. John Lujan (R-San Antonio), he’ll inherit a district far more winnable in the general election than when he last won a special election. Open HD70 in southwestern Collin Co. is the other Toss Up district, and its presence shifted neighboring HD66, held by Rep. Matt Shaheen (R-Plano), and HD67, held by Rep. Jeff Leach (R-Allen), into the Likely Republican category.

Both seats rated Lean Democratic are also seeing rapid shifts toward Republican candidates: the newly created, open HD37 in Cameron Co. and the sprawling HD74, the district held by Rep, Eddie Morales Jr. (D-Eagle Pass), which hugs the southern border from El Paso to the Maverick-Webb Co. line.

A striking change from 2020 is the number of seats rated in the “Likely” category. Our initial 2022 ratings include 29 Likely Republican seats, up from 13 in our initial 2020 ratings, and 22 Likely Democratic seats, up from 11 in 2020. No Democrat-held seat, save the jointly held but open HD63, landed in the Likely Republican category, but one Republican-held seat is rated as Likely Democratic: HD92, held today by Rep. Jeff Cason (R-Bedford). Republican-friendly precincts in Bedford and Hurst were swapped for more Democrat-friendly precincts on Arlington and Grand Prairie, moving HD92’s partisan lean 13 points toward Democratic candidates. As it is today, HD92 was 2.2 points bluer than the state as a whole in 2020. Its new configuration is 15.1 points bluer than the state as a whole based on the 2020 election.

Overall, the House map will have little impact on the partisan makeup of the chamber but a big impact on how safe those seats will be for their primary victors.

Congress

We rate just three out of 38 congressional districts as competitive following redistricting, and all three are Hispanic/Latino-majority districts:

  • CD15 – 79% of the voting-age population (VAP) is Hispanic/Latino
  • CD23 – 60% of VAP is Hispanic/Latino, and
  • CD28 – 73% of VAP is Hispanic/Latino.

As the districts were configured in 2020, those percentages were 78%, 66% and 74%, respectively. The biggest shift among the three occurred in Republican-held CD23, which saw the Anglo share of VAP increase to 31% from 26%. That might not seem like much of a shift, but it, combined with the improving performance of Republicans in the region, is enough to move the last decade’s most competitive district to Lean Republican.

The lone Toss Up seat is open CD15, which U.S. Rep. Vicente Gonzalez (D-McAllen) is vacating to seek adjacent, and Likely Democratic, CD34.

Twenty-six seats – two-thirds of the delegation – are rated either Safe Republican (16) or Safe Democrat (10).

Overall, we rate 125 of the state’s 219 legislative and congressional districts as “safe” for one party or the other. That’s 57% of all districts. Another 81 districts (37%) are rated as “likely” to go to one party or the other. Across much of the state, primary voters have all the power.

©2021 Texas Election Source LLC

🎙️We Have a Podcast! 🎙️

Bills and Business is your go-to podcast for conversations related to Texas legislation and business. Hosted by Laura Carr, Co-Founder of USLege—an AI-driven legislative tracking software—we bring you in-depth analysis on economic trends, impactful legislation, and key developments shaping Texas business.

Subscribe on Youtube and Spotify for weekly episodes!

🔍 USLege - The Only AI-First Political Tracking Solution ✨

USLege helps you track legislation and find what you need faster from bills, committee hearings, floor debates, and state agency meetings faster.

Say goodbye to tedious tasks!

You can follow USLege on LinkedIn, Facebook, and X.

🤝 Texas Association of Business 📈

Texas Association of Business (TAB) is the Texas State Chamber, representing companies of every size and industry. TAB’s purpose is to champion the best business climate in the world, unleashing the power of free enterprise to enhance lives for generations.

You can follow TAB on LinkedIn, Facebook, and X.

Table of Content
  1. 01 First
Trusted by Government Affairs Professionals and Corporate Policy Teams
Blog & Articles

Read more news

How to Choose the Best Legislative Tracking Software for Your Organization
This is some text inside of a div block.

In today’s fast-paced policy environment, staying informed is a constant challenge. Bills, hearings, and regulatory updates move quickly across jurisdictions, creating risks for organizations that rely on timely information, including the risk of missing important information when relying on manual processes. Choosing the best legislative tracking software is one of the most effective ways to manage legislative and regulatory tracking efficiently, minimize missed opportunities, and strengthen decision-making.

This article walks you through how to evaluate legislative and regulatory tools, compare coverage and capabilities, and understand which features help government affairs professionals and public affairs teams stay informed and a step ahead of rapid change. You’ll learn how to assess software platforms, review vendor performance, and apply a clear framework to guide your organization’s choice.

If you’re exploring modern solutions for policy monitoring, visit the best legislative tracking software to see how advanced systems help professionals track activity and analyze critical information across multiple jurisdictions.

Why Legislative Tracking Software Matters

Every legislative session brings thousands of new bills and hearings across the federal government, state legislatures, and local governments. For government affairs teams and law firms that must monitor state legislation or track regulations, the pace of change can be overwhelming.

Without digital platforms, staff may spend hours each day manually searching databases, reading committee reports, and updating spreadsheets. That process isn’t just inefficient—it’s risky. Missing one act or amendment could affect compliance, advocacy strategy, or even public reputation. Relying on manual tracking increases the chance of overlooking important details in legislative information, which can lead to missing critical updates or changes.

The Challenge of Volume and Velocity

  • Legislative and regulatory tracking spans bills, hearings, amendments, and regulations that appear daily.
  • Strategic decisions depend on access to verified data and real-time alerts.
  • Regulatory developments from government agencies can impact clients and advocacy groups instantly.

The Payoff

Automated tracking saves time, reduces human error, and delivers actionable insights faster. Teams can filter results, share updates, and focus their attention where it matters most—on influencing policy and shaping outcomes.

Key Features and Capabilities to Look For

Choosing the right tracking platform starts with understanding what differentiates effective tools from simple alert systems. Below are core features to evaluate before purchasing or implementing any solution.

Coverage Across Jurisdictions

The best systems provide a broad jurisdictional reach—from federal legislation to state legislative hearings and local government acts. Before committing, confirm whether the platform includes:

  • Federal and state legislation: Bills, amendments, regulations, hearings, and newly introduced bills, with Congress as a key source for federal legislative tracking.
  • Regulatory activity: Notices from agencies and committees.
  • Comprehensive data sources: Congressional records, local archives, and state portals.

Understanding the dynamic nature of Capitol Hill is crucial, as legislative activity and staff turnover at the federal level can significantly impact advocacy strategies and tracking efforts.

If your team must monitor state legislation, check that the vendor’s coverage includes smaller states and municipalities that frequently pass niche regulations.

Real Time Alerts and Notifications

Fast updates are critical for professionals who manage compliance or advocacy campaigns. Strong systems offer:

  • Instant email alerts for bill introductions, amendments, or new hearings.
  • Custom filters for topics, sponsors, committees, or jurisdictions.
  • Real-time dashboards showing where legislation is moving next.
  • Collaboration tools so teams can assign follow-up actions or comments.

With real-time alerts, government affairs professionals and policy experts can respond before deadlines pass—ensuring that organizations stay ahead and fully informed.

Analytics, Reporting, and Insight Generation

Good tracking isn’t just about collecting raw data. It’s about turning that data into useful analysis. A well-built platform helps users:

  • Create trend dashboards showing activity by topic, legislator, or region.
  • Generate reports to brief clients, executives, or advocacy groups.
  • Use artificial intelligence to compare bills, predict movement, or analyze outcomes.
  • Access historical data for longitudinal analysis.

By combining analytics with visualization tools, organizations gain the context needed to make strategic decisions quickly.

Artificial Intelligence in Legislative Tracking

Artificial intelligence transforms how government affairs professionals and government relations teams approach legislative tracking. By harnessing AI, organizations can analyze massive volumes of legislative and regulatory data in real time, ensuring that no critical bill or regulation goes unnoticed. AI-powered tools can automatically identify and prioritize bills that align with an organization’s advocacy goals, generate personalized bill summaries, and even predict the likelihood of legislative movement—all with minimal manual intervention.

For government relations professionals, this means less time spent sifting through raw data and more time focusing on strategy, stakeholder engagement, and influencing policy outcomes. AI-driven platforms can scan every legislative chamber, flagging new bills and regulations that matter most to your organization. These actionable insights empower teams to stay ahead of policy developments, respond quickly to emerging issues, and confidently make strategic decisions. As artificial intelligence continues to evolve, it will play an increasingly vital role in helping professionals track legislation, analyze regulatory trends, and drive effective advocacy across all levels of government.

Ease of Use and Vendor Support

Complex systems often fail because users find them hard to operate. When evaluating tracking software, consider:

  • Intuitive search functions and clear navigation.
  • Vendor training, documentation, and help-desk responsiveness.
  • Implementation timelines and onboarding resources.
  • Integration options with CRM, compliance, or reporting platforms.

The easier the interface, the more likely professionals across departments—legal, advocacy, and communications—will actually use it.

Security and Data Protection

When it comes to legislative tracking, security and data protection are non-negotiable for government affairs professionals and organizations. The sensitive nature of legislative and regulatory data—combined with the need for accurate, up-to-date information—means that robust security measures are essential. Leading legislative tracking platforms employ advanced encryption, secure servers, and strict access controls to ensure that only authorized users can access critical information.

In addition, reputable platforms adhere to industry best practices and compliance standards, safeguarding client data from unauthorized access or breaches. This commitment to security allows government relations professionals to focus on their core strategy and advocacy efforts, knowing that their data is protected at every step. By selecting a platform with proven security protocols, organizations can confidently manage their legislative tracking activities and maintain the trust of stakeholders, clients, and team members.

Integration with Other Tools

For government affairs professionals, efficiency and collaboration are key to successful advocacy. That’s why seamless integration between legislative tracking platforms and other essential tools—such as CRM systems, email clients, and social media monitoring software—is so valuable. Integrated platforms enable government relations professionals to track bills, monitor legislator interactions, and analyze advocacy campaigns all in one place, reducing manual data entry and streamlining workflows.

By connecting legislative tracking with CRM systems, organizations can maintain a comprehensive record of stakeholder engagement, track the progress of key bills, and measure the impact of their advocacy efforts. Integration with communication tools also ensures that teams can quickly share updates, assign tasks, and coordinate responses to legislative developments. Ultimately, these integrations help government affairs teams stay ahead of policy changes, maximize efficiency, and deliver more effective results for their organizations and clients.

Cost, Scalability, and ROI

Pricing varies widely across platforms. Some charge by user, others by jurisdiction. Evaluate:

  • Scalability: Can you expand access as new teams join?
  • Hidden costs: Extra fees for integrations or data exports.
  • ROI: Measure efficiency gains, reduced research hours, and improved regulatory compliance.

The right investment pays for itself through faster tracking, stronger insight, and better policy outcomes.

Building Your Decision-Making Checklist

A structured checklist helps teams evaluate multiple vendors objectively. Consider the following steps:

  1. Define scope: Identify which government levels—federal, state, local—your organization must monitor.
  2. Map stakeholders: Determine which departments, clients, professionals, or legislators need access to legislative tracking information.
  3. Create a scoring system: Rate vendors on coverage, alerts, analytics, ease of use, and cost.
  4. Request demos: Ask vendors to show how their tools track legislation and deliver reports.
  5. Review accuracy: Compare automated alerts to official legislative portals to confirm reliability.
  6. Pilot the system: Run a short test during a legislative session to evaluate performance.

This structured review allows government relations professionals and policy experts to make choices based on measurable evidence, not sales claims.

Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them

Even sophisticated organizations can stumble during implementation. Watch for these frequent errors:

  • Assuming full coverage: Some systems exclude local governments or agency regulations. This can result in missing important government actions, leaving you unaware of key legislative or regulatory developments.
  • Overloading users: Too many irrelevant alerts lead to fatigue.
  • Ignoring integration: Platforms that don’t connect to existing tools reduce efficiency.
  • Underestimating training: Teams may resist new systems without clear onboarding.
  • Skipping metrics: Without KPIs, you can’t analyze ROI or improvement.

Avoiding these issues keeps your strategy grounded in real performance data.

Implementation Best Practices and Maximizing Value

Rolling out a new tracking platform works best when everyone understands the process. Follow these steps:

  • Stakeholder alignment: Engage government affairs, legal, and communications teams early.
  • Define taxonomy: Standardize issue tags, committees, and jurisdiction names.
  • Workflow mapping: Assign ownership for monitoring, escalation, and communication.
  • Training: Offer live sessions and short guides to reinforce adoption.
  • Continuous review: Revisit settings each quarter to refine alerts and search filters.

As policy cycles shift, ongoing optimization ensures that your system remains accurate, relevant, and responsive to regulatory developments.

For additional insight on how legislative and regulatory tools operate, review the NCSL’s bill tracking overview, which explains how professionals track state legislation effectively.

Future of Legislative Tracking

The future of legislative tracking is bright, with rapid advancements in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and data analytics reshaping how government affairs professionals and organizations monitor and influence policy. As the demand for real-time, data-driven insights grows, legislative tracking tools will become even more sophisticated—offering predictive analytics, automated reporting, and deeper integration with other advocacy platforms.

We can expect to see greater adoption of cloud-based solutions, enhanced security features, and more intuitive user interfaces that make it easier for government relations professionals to access and analyze critical information. The integration of legislative tracking with CRM, communication, and analytics tools will provide a unified view of advocacy efforts, enabling teams to coordinate strategy and engage stakeholders more effectively.

As the policy landscape evolves, staying ahead of legislative and regulatory developments will be essential for organizations seeking to influence legislation and achieve their advocacy goals. By embracing the latest technologies and innovations, government affairs professionals can ensure they remain agile, informed, and ready to drive meaningful impact in an ever-changing environment.

Texas Political Spotlight
This is some text inside of a div block.

Welcome back, friends

Texas voters approved one of the largest property tax relief packages in state history on Tuesday, raising the homestead exemption to $140,000 and granting new tax breaks for seniors, people with disabilities, and small businesses. In Austin, residents rejected Proposition Q, a plan to fund public safety, homelessness programs, and city facility initiatives through a property tax hike, forcing city leaders to rework the budget and brace for service cuts. Meanwhile, Bexar County voters narrowly passed Propositions A and B, greenlighting up to $311 million in tourism-funded support for a new downtown Spurs arena and upgrades to the Freeman Coliseum grounds.

We hope you enjoyed today’s read!

Stay connected with TXLege News on X and LinkedIn!

Texas Political Spotlight
This is some text inside of a div block.

Welcome back friends,

Former Vice President Dick Cheney, one of the most influential and controversial figures in modern American politics, has died at 84, remembered by former President George W. Bush as a “patriot” whose intellect and conviction shaped decades of U.S. policy. In Texas, the Education Agency announced a sweeping takeover of Fort Worth ISD, the state’s second-largest intervention, citing years of academic underperformance and plans to install new local managers. And in Washington, a United Airlines flight was evacuated after a bomb threat, prompting an FBI investigation that later found no explosives, allowing operations to resume safely.

We hope you enjoyed today’s read!

Stay connected with TXLege News on X and LinkedIn!