By The Numbers
03/20/2022

By the Numbers: First-place Candidates’ Historical Runoff Performance

TXElects

83%

Winning percentage of runoff candidates who finished 10% or more ahead of their challenger in the primary election since 2002.

There have been 204 “open” primary runoff elections for state, legislative and federal offices since 2002, and the candidate who finished first in the primary election has won 60% of them. “Open” runoffs do not have an incumbent on the ballot, though the “open” runoff winner might ultimately face an incumbent.

As we have before, we looked at the winning percentages of first-place candidates based on whether they received more or less than 40% of the vote in their respective primaries and whether they finished more or less than 10% ahead of the second-place candidate. As they did in 2018, the 2020 runoff results tracked very closely with the historical averages.

Since 2002, first-place candidates won:

  • 80.4% of runoffs after receiving at least 40% of the vote with a margin of at least 10% over the second-place candidate
  • 85.7% of runoffs after receiving less than 40% of the vote with a margin of at least 10%
  • 52.4% of runoffs after receiving at least 40% of the vote with a margin of less than 10%; and
  • 43.5% of runoffs after receiving less than 40% of the vote with a margin of less than 10%.

For the first three groups above, there isn’t much difference between the Republican and Democratic runoffs. But there’s something particularly interesting about the fourth group.

Democratic candidates receiving less than 40% of the vote and finishing first by less than 10% of the vote have won 62% of their runoff races. Similarly situated Republicans have won only 34% of the time, a difference of 28 percentage points.

The differing fortunes of the parties’ candidates in that fourth group largely defines the difference between the two parties’ success rates generally. Since 2002, 55% of first-place Republicans have won runoffs compared to 68% of first-place Democrats. Excluding runoffs for which first-place candidates received less than 40% of the vote with a smaller than 10-point margin, the historical winning percentages of Republicans (71%) and Democrats (72%) are nearly identical.

Regardless of party, first-place candidates’ historical success rates increase as their plurality rises:

  • 74% of candidates receiving at least 45% of the vote prevailed
  • 64% of those receiving 40%-45%
  • 56% of those receiving 35%-40%
  • 48% of those receiving 30%-35%; and
  • 48% of those receiving less than 30% of the primary vote.

The same applies to their margin over the second-place candidate:

  • 90% of candidates finishing more than 20 points ahead of their rival prevailed
  • 79% of those finishing 15-20 points ahead
  • 79% of those finishing 10-15 points ahead
  • 46% of those finishing 5-10 points ahead; and
  • 46% of those finishing less than 5 points ahead in the primary.

Of those who finished less than 5 points ahead of their rivals, 60% of Democrats prevailed compared to 39% of Republicans.

All of the preceding figures are for open-seat races – in other words, no incumbents. We’ll get to incumbents in a future installment. Suffice it to say, they have not fared as well as similarly situated open-seat candidates.

2022 Open-seat Runoffs

We are nine weeks away from runoff election night when voters will decide the outstanding Republican and Democratic nominees for federal, state and county office. We are tracking 39 runoff races for Congress, statewide office and the Texas Legislature in which no candidates are incumbents. We have broken them down into those four categories based on the first-place candidate’s plurality (over or under 40%) and their margin over the second-place finisher (over or under 10%). Keep in mind that the winning percentage is the historical average, not any one candidate’s odds of winning their particular race.

Greater than 40% Plurality, Greater than 10% Margin

Republicans (Win 78% of the time)

  • LAND (Likely R): Dawn Buckingham (42%) vs. Tim Westley (15%) – 27.0% margin
  • CD32 (Safe D): Antonio Swad (40%) vs. Justin Webb (18%) – 22.2% margin
  • CD37 (Safe D): Jenny Garcia Sharon (47%) vs. Rod Lingsch (28%) – 19.0% margin
  • SD24 (Likely R): Pete Flores (46%) vs. Raul Reyes Jr. (33%) – 13.3% margin
  • CD7 (Safe D): Johnny Teague (43%) vs. Tim Stroud (29%) – 13.2% margin

If the historical average holds, we would expect 4 of these 5 first-place candidates to win.

Democrats (Win 83% of the time)

  • CD30 (Safe D): Jasmine Crockett (48.5%) vs. Jane Hope Hamilton (17%) – 31.5% margin
  • AG (Lean R): Rochelle Garza (43%) vs. Joe Jaworski (20%) – 23.2% margin
  • HD147 (Safe D): Jolanda Jones (41%) vs. Danielle Keys Bess (20%) – 21.4% margin
  • CD21 (Safe R): Claudia Zapata (47%) vs. Ricardo Villarreal (27%) – 20.2% margin
  • CD1 (Safe R): J.J. Jefferson (46%) vs. Victor Dunn (28%) – 17.5% margin
  • COMP (Likely R): Janet Dudding (46%) vs. Angel Luis Vega (35%) – 11.8% margin
  • LTGOV (Lean R): Mike Collier (42%) vs. Michelle Beckley (30%) – 11.6% margin

If the historical average holds, we would expect 6 of these 7 first-place candidates to win.

Less than 40% Plurality, Greater than 10% Margin

Republicans

    None

Democrats (Win 75% of the time)

    HD76 (Likely D): Suleman Lalani (37%) vs. Vanesia Johnson (25%) – 11.9% margin

There’s only one – he either wins or loses. Since 2002, there have only been four other similarly situated Democrats, and three of them prevailed. The only one who didn’t was Lulu Flores in 2002.

Greater than 40% Plurality, Less than 10% Margin

Republicans (Win 52% of the time)

  • HD93 (Likely R): Nate Schatzline (44%) vs. Laura Hill (37%) – 7.1% margin
  • HD61 (Likely R): Frederick Frazier (42%) vs. Paul Chabot (37%) – 5.6% margin
  • HD84 (Likely R): David Glasheen (42%) vs. Carl Tepper (40%) – 1.7% margin
  • HD73 (Safe R): Barron Casteel (46%) vs. Carrie Isaac (45%) – 0.9% margin

If the historical average holds, we would expect 2 of these 4 first-place candidates to win.

Democrats (Win 53% of the time)

  • CD38 (Safe R): Diana Alexander (46%) vs. Duncan Klussmann (38%) – 7.5% margin
  • HD22 (Likely D): Joseph Trahan (48%) vs. Manuel Hayes (43%) – 5.8% margin
  • HD37 (Lean D): Ruben Cortez (41%) vs. Luis Villarreal Jr. (39%) – 2.7% margin

If the historical average holds, we would expect 1 or 2 of these first-place candidates to win. In 2020, two similarly situated first-place Democrats won and one lost.

Less than 40% Plurality, Less than 10% Margin

Republicans (Win 34% of the time)

  • HD122 (Likely R): Elisa Chan (37%) vs. Mark Dorazio (28%) – 9.5% margin
  • CD29 (Safe D): Robert Schafranek (40%) vs. Julio Garza (32%) – 7.5% margin
  • CD35 (Safe D): Dan McQueen (21%) vs. Michael Rodriguez (15%) – 6.2% margin
  • HD70 (Toss Up): Janee Jolly (38%) vs. Eric Bowlin (32%) – 5.8% margin
  • CD28 (Lean D): Cassy Garcia (23%) vs. Sandra Whitten (18%) – 5.5% margin
  • HD52 (Lean R): Pat McGuinness (35%) vs. Caroline Harris (31%) – 3.8% margin
  • HD23 (Likely R): Patrick Gurski (31%) vs. Terri Leo-Wilson (28%) – 3.2% margin
  • HD19 (Safe R): Ellen Troxclair (38%) vs. Justin Berry (35%) – 2.9% margin
  • HD17 (Safe R): Stan Gerdes (30%) vs. Paul Pape (28%) – 2.2% margin
  • CD30 (Safe D): J. Frank Harris (33%) vs. James Rodgers (31%) – 1.6% margin
  • HD63 (Likely R): Ben Bumgarner (29%) vs. Jeff Younger (27%) – 1.6% margin
  • HD133 (Likely R): Shelly Barineau (28%) vs. Mano DeAyala (27%) – 1.4% margin

If the historical average holds, we would expect 4 of these 12 first-place candidates to win, which means 8 would lose.

Democrats (Win 62% of the time)

  • HD100 (Safe D): Sandra Crenshaw (34%) vs. Venton Jones (26%) – 8.6% margin
  • CD15 (Toss Up): Ruben Ramirez (28%) vs. Michelle Vallejo (20%) – 8.2% margin
  • CD24 (Likely R): Jan McDowell (39%) vs. Derrik Gay (33%) – 6.9% margin
  • LAND (Likely R): Sandragrace Martinez (32%) vs. Jay Kleberg (26%) – 5.8% margin
  • HD114 (Safe D): Alexandra Guio (25%) vs. John Bryant (21%) – 3.4% margin
  • SD27 (Lean D): Morgan LaMantia (34%) vs. Sara Stapleton-Barrera (33%) – 1.0% margin
  • HD70 (Toss Up): Cassandra Garcia Hernandez (34%) vs. Mihaela Plesa (33%) – 1.0% margin

If the historical average holds, we would expect 4 of these 7 first-place candidates to win.

While we have not specifically mentioned them here, for purposes of this analysis we are also keeping an eye of five State Board of Education runoffs. Even though we no longer track those offices generally, this dataset has historically included SBOE races, so we will keep that consistent.

©2022 Texas Election Source LLC

🎙️We Have a Podcast! 🎙️

Bills and Business is your go-to podcast for conversations related to Texas legislation and business. Hosted by Laura Carr, Co-Founder of USLege—an AI-driven legislative tracking software—we bring you in-depth analysis on economic trends, impactful legislation, and key developments shaping Texas business.

Subscribe on Youtube and Spotify for weekly episodes!

🔍 USLege - The Only AI-First Political Tracking Solution ✨

USLege helps you track legislation and find what you need faster from bills, committee hearings, floor debates, and state agency meetings faster.

Say goodbye to tedious tasks!

You can follow USLege on LinkedIn, Facebook, and X.

🤝 Texas Association of Business 📈

Texas Association of Business (TAB) is the Texas State Chamber, representing companies of every size and industry. TAB’s purpose is to champion the best business climate in the world, unleashing the power of free enterprise to enhance lives for generations.

You can follow TAB on LinkedIn, Facebook, and X.

Table of Content
  1. 01 First
Trusted by Government Affairs Professionals and Corporate Policy Teams
Blog & Articles

Read more news

How to Choose the Best Federal Legislative Tracking Software for Your Organization
This is some text inside of a div block.

Every year, thousands of bills move through Congress, and without the right tracking system, teams miss critical information that affects compliance, strategy, and advocacy.

Manual tracking creates gaps.

Teams rely on scattered data, delayed alerts, and inconsistent updates, which makes it harder to stay ahead of policy developments.

Modern legislative tracking tools solve this by centralizing legislative and regulatory data, automating bill tracking, and delivering real-time alerts.

They allow organizations to monitor federal legislation, understand the legislative process, and act quickly when changes occur.

In this guide, you’ll learn how to evaluate legislative monitoring platforms, what features matter most, and how policy management solutions help government affairs teams work smarter.

You will also see how to compare tools, avoid mistakes, and choose a system that fits your organization.

After reviewing your current workflow, you can explore a centralized system like federal legislative tracking software

to improve how your team tracks legislation and responds to policy changes.

What Is Federal Legislative Tracking Software?

Federal legislative tracking software is a system that helps organizations track bills, monitor committee hearings, and follow the full legislative process in one place.

It replaces manual spreadsheets with automated tracking, giving users access to accurate and updated data.

Core Functionality Explained

A strong legislative tracking tool provides:

  • Bill tracking across Congress and committees.
  • Real-time alerts when bills move or change.
  • Search tools to filter legislation by keywords or policy areas.
  • Centralized legislative and regulatory data.

Instead of checking multiple sources, users can track bills with just a few clicks.

These systems also:

  • Automate legislative tracking across every legislative session.
  • Provide bill summaries to quickly understand relevance.
  • Deliver alerts when committee hearings or votes are scheduled.
  • Help users stay informed about pending legislation and regulatory changes.

Congress introduces thousands of bills each year.

Without automation, tracking becomes inefficient and error-prone.

Why Organizations Need Legislative Monitoring Platforms

Organizations face constant pressure to monitor federal legislation and regulatory developments.

Missing a policy update can impact compliance, operations, and long-term planning.

Key Use Cases Across Industries

Legislative monitoring platforms support different teams across an organization:

  • Government affairs teams track policy developments and engage with legislators.
  • Public affairs professionals monitor regulatory tracking and advocacy efforts.
  • Legal teams follow regulations and compliance requirements.
  • Corporations track bills that impact stakeholders and clients.

These tools help organizations:

  • Stay ahead of policy changes and regulatory developments.
  • Improve response time with real-time alerts.
  • Support advocacy and government relations strategies.
  • Provide actionable insights for informed decisions.

For example, a public policy manager can monitor policy areas and receive alerts when bills move through committee assignments.

This allows the team to act quickly and ensure their voice is heard during advocacy efforts.

Essential Features to Look For in Policy Management Solutions

Choosing the right legislative tracking tool depends on features that align with your organization and workflow tools.

Real-Time Alerts and Notifications

Real-time alerts are critical for staying informed.

Look for:

  • Alerts for bill movements, amendments, and executive orders.
  • Email alerts and dashboard notifications.
  • Alerts tailored to specific policy areas.

These alerts ensure your team never misses the latest developments.

Advanced Search and Filtering

Search functionality determines how quickly you find relevant results.

Key features include:

  • Keyword-based search across legislative and regulatory data.
  • Filters by committee, sponsor, and legislative session.
  • Ability to track bills across multiple policy areas.

Strong search tools help teams quickly understand what matters.

Data Visualization and Reporting

Advanced reporting turns raw data into useful analysis.

Look for:

  • Legislative dashboards that show trends.
  • Custom reports for stakeholders and clients.
  • Advanced reporting features for deeper analysis.

These features help organizations make informed decisions based on real data.

AI and Predictive Analytics

AI-powered tools are changing how legislative tracking works.

Capabilities include:

  • AI-powered insights that summarize bills.
  • Predictive analysis of policy changes.
  • Detection of trends across legislation.

These tools help policy professionals quickly understand large volumes of data.

Integration Capabilities

Integration improves team collaboration and workflow.

Look for systems that:

  • Connect with CRM and internal workflow tools.
  • Allow teams to assign tasks and share notes.
  • Support team collaboration across departments.

Integration ensures support teams can work together efficiently.

How to Evaluate Federal Legislative Tracking Software

Selecting the right legislative tracking tool requires a clear evaluation process.

Define Your Organization’s Needs

Start by understanding your organization:

  • Size of your team.
  • Type of legislative and regulatory tracking required.
  • Level of engagement in government affairs.

This helps narrow down options.

Compare Features vs Cost

Pricing varies depending on coverage and features.

  • Basic tools may cost around $1,000.
  • Advanced systems can exceed $5,000.

Focus on ROI rather than price alone.

Assess Data Accuracy and Coverage

Accurate data is essential.

Check:

  • Coverage of federal legislation and regulatory data.
  • Frequency of updates from Congress.
  • Quality of bill summaries and analysis.

to understand how legislative information is structured.

User Experience and Support

User experience affects adoption.

Evaluate:

  • Ease of use.
  • Onboarding and support.
  • Ability for teams to collaborate.

A system should help your team work smarter, not harder.

Common Mistakes to Avoid When Choosing Legislative Tracking Systems

Many organizations choose tools without fully evaluating their needs.

Choosing Based on Price Alone

Low-cost tools may lack comprehensive coverage and advanced reporting.

Ignoring Integration Needs

Without integration, workflow tools become disconnected.

Overlooking User Adoption

Complex systems reduce productivity and team collaboration.

Not Testing the Platform

Always request demos or trials.

Testing ensures the tool fits your organization and supports your team.

Key Benefits of Using Federal Legislative Tracking Software

Organizations that adopt legislative tracking tools gain a clear advantage.

Improved Decision-Making

Access to real-time data leads to better analysis and informed decisions.

Time Efficiency

Automation helps teams save time by reducing manual research.

Enhanced Compliance

Tracking regulations and policy changes reduces compliance risks.

Strategic Advantage

Organizations can stay ahead of policy developments and act early.

Benefits include:

  • Faster response to legislation.
  • Better communication with stakeholders.
  • Stronger advocacy and government relations strategies.

Future Trends in Legislative Monitoring Platforms

Legislative tracking continues to evolve with new technology.

AI and Machine Learning Integration

AI-powered systems provide predictive insights and deeper analysis.

Increased Automation

Automation reduces manual tracking and improves efficiency.

Data-Driven Policy Insights

Advanced analytics provide actionable insights into policy changes.

Organizations are shifting toward intelligent platforms that combine data, AI-powered tools, and automation.

How to Implement Legislative Tracking Software Successfully

Implementation determines long-term success.

Onboarding and Training

Train your team to use the system effectively.

Define Monitoring Criteria

Set alerts, keywords, and policy areas to track bills.

Integrate with Existing Systems

Ensure smooth workflow integration and team collaboration.

Proper setup helps organizations maximize value and stay informed.

Texas Political Spotlight
This is some text inside of a div block.

Welcome back, friends

Texas hemp businesses have filed suit to block new state regulations they say effectively ban smokeable hemp products and impose licensing fee increases so steep they could force many businesses to close. Yesterday, the Texas House State Affairs Committee heard testimony on the explosive growth of data centers in the state, with interconnection requests on the power grid now exceeding 400,000 megawatts and raising questions about cost, reliability, and water usage. Lastly, nineteen Texas summer camps are challenging a new state mandate requiring them to install fiber optic internet infrastructure, citing costs as high as $1.2 million and arguing the requirement is unworkable for rural properties and does nothing to improve camper safety.

Before you dive in…

USLege will be hosting our first ever Best in Government Affairs Awards Ceremony on April 23rd at Speakeasy in Downtown Austin.

Winners and guests will be treated to evening of celebration for the accomplishments in the 89th Texas Legislative Session.

You can expect music, networking, food & drinks and formal award acceptance.  

This is going to be a fun party! We hope to see you there.

»» RSVP HERE: Best in Government Affairs Awards Ceremony hosted by USLege

»» Watch Representative Ken King’s Intro Here ««

We hope you enjoyed today’s read!

Stay connected with TXLege News on X and LinkedIn!

Texas Political Spotlight
This is some text inside of a div block.

Welcome back, friends

A federal trial is underway in Texas over whether the state's prison system has done enough to protect inmates from extreme heat, with a price tag of $1.5 billion standing at the center of the debate. Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows has tasked a new legislative committee with studying whether Texas could absorb one or more counties from New Mexico, a long-shot proposal that has already drawn a sharp response from the neighboring state's governor. A public feud between Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and acting Comptroller Kelly Hancock has spilled into federal court, where a judge is overseeing the fallout in a lawsuit alleging religious discrimination in the state's $1 billion ESA Program.

We hope you enjoyed today’s read!

Stay connected with TXLege News on X and LinkedIn!

Texas Political Spotlight
This is some text inside of a div block.

Welcome back, friends

Texas hemp businesses have filed suit to block new state regulations they say effectively ban smokeable hemp products and impose licensing fee increases so steep they could force many businesses to close. Yesterday, the Texas House State Affairs Committee heard testimony on the explosive growth of data centers in the state, with interconnection requests on the power grid now exceeding 400,000 megawatts and raising questions about cost, reliability, and water usage. Lastly, nineteen Texas summer camps are challenging a new state mandate requiring them to install fiber optic internet infrastructure, citing costs as high as $1.2 million and arguing the requirement is unworkable for rural properties and does nothing to improve camper safety.

Before you dive in…

USLege will be hosting our first ever Best in Government Affairs Awards Ceremony on April 23rd at Speakeasy in Downtown Austin.

Winners and guests will be treated to evening of celebration for the accomplishments in the 89th Texas Legislative Session.

You can expect music, networking, food & drinks and formal award acceptance.  

This is going to be a fun party! We hope to see you there.

»» RSVP HERE: Best in Government Affairs Awards Ceremony hosted by USLege

»» Watch Representative Ken King’s Intro Here ««

We hope you enjoyed today’s read!

Stay connected with TXLege News on X and LinkedIn!

Texas Political Spotlight
This is some text inside of a div block.

Welcome back, friends

A federal trial is underway in Texas over whether the state's prison system has done enough to protect inmates from extreme heat, with a price tag of $1.5 billion standing at the center of the debate. Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows has tasked a new legislative committee with studying whether Texas could absorb one or more counties from New Mexico, a long-shot proposal that has already drawn a sharp response from the neighboring state's governor. A public feud between Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and acting Comptroller Kelly Hancock has spilled into federal court, where a judge is overseeing the fallout in a lawsuit alleging religious discrimination in the state's $1 billion ESA Program.

We hope you enjoyed today’s read!

Stay connected with TXLege News on X and LinkedIn!

Texas Political Spotlight
This is some text inside of a div block.

Welcome back, friends

New Texas rules on hemp-derived THC products take effect March 31, reshaping what can be sold, who can sell it and how the industry operates, with major implications for businesses, consumers and enforcement across the state. Lt. Gov Dan Patrick has unveiled the Texas Senate committee lineup. At the same time, state education leaders are moving to revise curriculum guidance tied to Cesar Chavez amid emerging allegations, prompting immediate changes in classrooms and raising broader questions about how schools respond when historical narratives shift.

»»» View official press release from Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick Here «««

We hope you enjoyed today’s read!

Stay connected with TXLege News on X and LinkedIn!