House Race Analyses, Straight-ticket Voting
06/04/2017

Straight-party Vote Analysis for HD115

TXElects

In a state where single-punch, straight-party voters continue to gain influence in determining election outcomes, it was the voters who work their way through the whole ballot that swung HD115 last year. By just over a thousand votes, Rep. Matt Rinaldi (R-Irving) won re-election in a district that Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton won by more than 4,700 votes.

Rinaldi received in excess of 3,800 more votes than Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump, making him one of the highest vote-getters in his district’s precincts not named Clinton, and he was one of just four legislators to win despite facing a deficit in single-punch voting.


Rinaldi defeated Carrollton attorney Dorotha Ocker, 53%-40%, among the district’s “full-ballot” voters. His double-digit margin was consistent with other down-ballot Republicans, but it diverged significantly from the top of the ballot. Clinton defeated Trump, 49%-36%, among those same voters.

That Ocker came close to winning, and Clinton won outright, this northwestern Dallas Co. district – long a Republican stronghold* – is indicative of how far the Democratic Party has come here. For the first time in recent history, more straight-party Democratic votes were cast in HD115’s precincts than straight-party Republican votes.

Ocker received in excess of 8K more votes than the Democrat** who ran for the seat four years earlier, and voters cast 39% more straight-party Democratic votes than in 2012. When we last explored straight-party voting in HD115, we noted that the district “remain[s] friendly to Republican candidates despite recent inroads made by Democrats. Republicans still won the district, but the gap has narrowed greatly, at least in presidential election years.

Overall, single-punch, straight-party voters accounted for 63% of all ballots cast in HD115 last year, which is consistent with recent years. The chart below shows the estimated number of single-punch, straight-party votes cast in the district’s current precincts going back to 2000.

Democrats have been gaining ground – or at least treading water – consistently since 2000, when Republican candidates had a greater than 11K-vote advantage in straight-party voting. The number of Republican straight-party votes cast in a presidential year peaked in 2004 and has fallen each of the three presidential elections since. Roughly the same number of people cast straight-party Republican votes in 2016 as in 2000.

The number of straight-party Democratic votes has increased in each cyclical election since 2000/2002 with the exception of a slight dip in 2012 from 2008. In 2016, 183% more people case straight-party Democratic votes than in 2000.

Republicans’ high-water mark for a gubernatorial year was in 2010, but they have maintained a significant margin over the Democrats in gubernatorial years. The gap has closed, but it was still around 5K in 2014. In the last four gubernatorial election cycles, Republican straight-party turnout has fallen an average of 36% from the previous presidential year, while Democratic turnout has fallen an average of 47%.

If those trends hold, Rinaldi would have some level of straight-party voting advantage in 2018. The table below shows the estimated straight-party vote advantage under a variety of scenarios of changes in turnout – all declines – from the 2016 totals based on the last four gubernatorial election cycles.

[supsystic-tables id='5']

Scenarios are based upon the highest, average and lowest declines in the last four gubernatorial elections relative to the preceding presidential election, and the midpoints between those values, for each party. For example, if you assume that the decline in Republican straight-party voting will be the average of the last four gubernatorial elections, and the Democratic decline will be midway between the average and the lowest for those elections, then the resulting 2018 Democratic advantage would be 68 votes, a dead heat. If both parties saw an average decline in turnout from 2016, then the resulting 2018 Republican advantage would be 1,146 votes.

Rinaldi won a majority of full-ballot voters in both of his general election races so far. In 2014, his margin among full-ballot voters was considerably smaller than in 2016, but he had a nearly 5K-vote advantage in straight-party voting, giving him a much more comfortable victory than last year.

Ocker has confirmed she is running again in 2018.

It’s also worth noting that a Libertarian candidate received 999 votes (811 from full-ballot voters) in 2014, which likely affected Rinaldi’s total more than his Democratic opponent’s. No one ran as a Libertarian in 2016. The presence of one could have made that race much closer. Democrats have won several races in Dallas Co. (and elsewhere) in the last decade with less than 50% of the vote in part because of the presence of Libertarian candidates.

©2017 Texas Election Source LLC

* A Republican has been elected to represent most of the geography that is now HD115 since 1972, when District 33B occupied the northwestern corner of the county. From 1983 until 2001, much of current HD115 was HD99.

  • Al Korioth (R-Dallas), 1973-1977
  • Bill Blanton (R-Carrllton), 1977-1987
  • Kenny Marchant (R-Carrollton), 1987-2003
  • Jim Jackson (R-Carrollton), 2003-2013
  • Bennett Ratliff (R-Coppell), 2013-2015
  • Matt Rinaldi (R-Irving), 2015-present

The last Democrat to represent this portion of Dallas Co. was Rep. Jack Blanton (D-Carrollton), who was elected to his third and final term in 1970.

** HD115 was slightly redrawn in 2013, so several precincts currently in the district were part of HD103 in 2012. For purposes of this analysis, we added the votes received by Rep. Rafael Anchia (D-Dallas) to the total received by HD115 nominee Mary Clare Fabishak and deducted votes Fabishak received from precincts that are no longer part of HD115.

🎙️We Have a Podcast! 🎙️

Bills and Business is your go-to podcast for conversations related to Texas legislation and business. Hosted by Laura Carr, Co-Founder of USLege—an AI-driven legislative tracking software—we bring you in-depth analysis on economic trends, impactful legislation, and key developments shaping Texas business.

Subscribe on Youtube and Spotify for weekly episodes!

🔍 USLege - The Only AI-First Political Tracking Solution ✨

USLege helps you track legislation and find what you need faster from bills, committee hearings, floor debates, and state agency meetings faster.

Say goodbye to tedious tasks!

You can follow USLege on LinkedIn, Facebook, and X.

🤝 Texas Association of Business 📈

Texas Association of Business (TAB) is the Texas State Chamber, representing companies of every size and industry. TAB’s purpose is to champion the best business climate in the world, unleashing the power of free enterprise to enhance lives for generations.

You can follow TAB on LinkedIn, Facebook, and X.

Table of Content
  1. 01 First
Trusted by Government Affairs Professionals and Corporate Policy Teams
Blog & Articles

Read more news

How to Choose the Right Legislative Tracking and Management Software for Your Organization
This is some text inside of a div block.

Many organizations still rely on spreadsheets, scattered email alerts, and manual bill tracking methods that waste time and increase the risk of missing important updates.

As legislation moves through Congress, committee hearings, and state legislatures, even a small delay in tracking can create problems for stakeholders, clients, and government affairs teams.

Modern legislative tracking software gives users access to centralized data, advanced reporting, automated alerts, and collaboration tools that improve efficiency and support informed decisions.

For organizations involved in advocacy, public policy, government relations, or regulatory monitoring, the right system can help teams stay ahead of fast-moving policy changes.

Organizations comparing platforms often begin by reviewing solutions focused on legislative tracking and management software that combine legislative tracking, policy tracking, stakeholder engagement, and analysis into one system.

Why Legislative Tracking Matters More Than Ever

Government activity moves quickly across Congress, federal agencies, and state legislatures.

A single bill can move through committee assignments, amendments, hearings, and floor votes within days.

That pace creates pressure for public affairs professionals, advocacy groups, and government affairs professionals who need accurate information before making strategic decisions.

Legislative tracking helps organizations:

  • Track bills in real time
  • Monitor regulatory developments
  • Analyze policy developments
  • Stay informed about government actions
  • Support advocacy efforts
  • Improve stakeholder engagement
  • Save time on manual research

Without proper tracking software, teams may miss alerts tied to committee hearings, amendments, or policy changes that affect operations and compliance.

The Growing Complexity of Bill Tracking

Bill tracking has become harder because organizations now monitor legislation across multiple levels of government.

Federal legislation, local policy updates, and state law changes often overlap within the same policy areas.

Public affairs professionals often monitor:

Legislative Area Common Focus
Congress Federal legislation and funding
State legislatures State law and regulations
Local government Ordinances and zoning
Federal agencies Regulatory developments
Committees Committee hearings and amendments
Congress
Common Focus Federal legislation and funding
State Legislatures
Common Focus State law and regulations
Local Government
Common Focus Ordinances and zoning
Federal Agencies
Common Focus Regulatory developments
Committees
Common Focus Committee hearings and amendments

Many public affairs professionals use legislative tracking software because manual tracking can become overwhelming when teams need to follow hundreds of bills across different government systems.

On average, only about 6% of proposed legislation becomes law.

Even so, organizations still need to monitor every important bill because amendments and committee actions can influence policy before final passage.

Features Every Legislative Tracking Tool Should Include

Real Time Alerts

Real time alerts are one of the most important features in any legislative tracking tool.

Organizations need alerts that notify users immediately when:

  • A bill changes status
  • Committee hearings are scheduled
  • Amendments are introduced
  • Regulations are updated
  • Government actions affect policy areas
  • State legislators sponsor new legislation

Fast alerts help organizations stay ahead instead of reacting too late.

An effective legislative tracking tool should allow users to customize alerts based on:

  • Keywords
  • Policy areas
  • Committees
  • Sponsors
  • States
  • Date ranges
  • Regulatory topics

Real-time alerts can also be delivered through mobile notifications, dashboards, and email alerts, so users receive important information quickly.

AI-Powered Analysis and Summaries

Modern software increasingly uses machine learning to simplify legislative tracking and analysis.

AI-powered systems can:

  1. Summarize legislation
  2. Highlight changes in the bill text
  3. Identify trends in policy developments
  4. Categorize legislation automatically
  5. Generate actionable insights

These tools help public affairs professionals analyze legislation faster and make informed decisions without reviewing every page manually.

AI summaries are especially useful when Congress releases lengthy amendments or committee markups shortly before hearings.

Advanced Reporting and Analytics

Advanced reporting tools help organizations analyze legislative trends and support strategic decisions.

A strong legislative tracking tool should provide:

  • Custom dashboards
  • Exportable reports
  • Trend analysis
  • Search filtering
  • Stakeholder reports
  • Historical tracking

Advanced reporting also helps government affairs teams communicate updates clearly to leadership, clients, and stakeholders.

Organizations that rely heavily on advocacy and government relations often need advanced reporting to demonstrate policy influence and measure advocacy efforts.

Why Collaboration Features Matter

Legislative tracking is rarely handled by one person alone.

Government affairs teams, advocacy groups, legal departments, and compliance professionals often work together to analyze legislation and coordinate responses.

Good collaboration features allow users to:

  • Add comments to legislative records
  • Share analysis internally
  • Assign bills to team members
  • Add tags and labels
  • Monitor workflow progress
  • Track stakeholder engagement

These features help organizations operate more efficiently while reducing duplicate work.

Stakeholder Mapping and Relationship Management

Many legislative tracking software platforms now include stakeholder mapping tools.

These tools help organizations:

  • Track relationships with lawmakers
  • Monitor interactions with staff
  • Organize committee assignments
  • Analyze influence patterns
  • Build meaningful relationships

Government relations teams often use stakeholder mapping to identify opportunities to influence policy and engage decision-makers more effectively.

For example, organizations may analyze committee assignments to determine which lawmakers influence specific policy areas.

Coverage Across Multiple Levels of Government

The best policy tracking systems monitor legislation across multiple levels of government.

That includes:

  • Congress
  • Federal agencies
  • State legislatures
  • Local governments
  • Regulatory agencies

Broad coverage helps organizations stay informed about policy changes that may affect operations nationally and regionally.

Organizations involved in public policy or advocacy often need access to federal legislation alongside state law and local regulations.

Without broad coverage, users may miss important government actions tied to interconnected policy developments.

How Legislative Tracking Software Improves Efficiency

Manual bill tracking requires staff to search the government website for updates.

That process consumes valuable resources and increases the chance of missing critical alerts.

Tracking software improves efficiency by automating:

  • Bill monitoring
  • Status updates
  • Alerts
  • Search functions
  • Reporting
  • Policy tracking
  • Data organization

Automated tracking allows users to focus on analysis and advocacy instead of repetitive administrative work.

Legislative tracking software also helps organizations stay ahead by providing early warnings about committee hearings, proposed legislation, and regulatory developments.

What Public Affairs Professionals Need Most

Public affairs professionals often manage large volumes of legislative data under tight deadlines.

To support that work, software should provide:

  • Easy access to information
  • Fast search capabilities
  • Accurate alerts
  • Real-time analysis
  • Collaboration tools
  • Support for advocacy efforts

Public affairs professionals also need tools that simplify communication with stakeholders and clients.

The ability to export reports, organize policy tracking, and monitor government actions in one place can deliver results faster than fragmented systems.

The Importance of User Experience

A legislative tracking tool may include advanced features, but poor usability can limit effectiveness.

Organizations should evaluate:

  • Dashboard layout
  • Navigation speed
  • Search performance
  • Mobile access
  • Reporting design
  • Support options

Simple interfaces help users act quickly during fast-moving legislative process updates.

Government affairs professionals often need immediate access to bill information during hearings, advocacy meetings, or policy reviews.

If software is difficult to use, teams may avoid the system entirely.

Scalability for Small Teams and Large Enterprises

Organizations vary widely in size.

Some advocacy groups monitor a handful of bills, while large enterprises track legislation across all 50 states and Congress simultaneously.

Scalable tracking software should support:

  • Growing data volumes
  • Additional users
  • Expanded policy tracking
  • Multi-state monitoring
  • Large reporting needs

Affordability also matters because software pricing can vary significantly.

Smaller organizations may prioritize cost-effective tools with basic bill tracking and alerts, while large enterprises may need advanced reporting, stakeholder mapping, and machine learning capabilities.

Questions Organizations Should Ask Before Choosing Software

Before selecting a legislative tracking tool, organizations should evaluate operational needs carefully.

Key Questions to Ask

Question Why It Matters
Does the software monitor federal legislation and state law? Broad coverage improves tracking
Are real-time alerts customizable? Users receive relevant updates
Does the system support collaboration? Teams coordinate more efficiently
Are advanced reporting features included? Leadership needs clear analysis
Can users search historical data? Research and policy analysis improve
Does the platform support mobile access? Teams stay informed anywhere
Is stakeholder engagement included? Advocacy efforts become more organized
Does the provider offer support and training? Faster adoption improves efficiency
Federal & State Legislation
Question Does the software monitor federal legislation and state law?
Why It Matters Broad coverage improves tracking
Real-Time Alerts
Question Are real-time alerts customizable?
Why It Matters Users receive relevant updates
Collaboration
Question Does the system support collaboration?
Why It Matters Teams coordinate more efficiently
Reporting Features
Question Are advanced reporting features included?
Why It Matters Leadership needs clear analysis
Historical Data
Question Can users search historical data?
Why It Matters Research and policy analysis improve
Mobile Access
Question Does the platform support mobile access?
Why It Matters Teams stay informed anywhere
Stakeholder Engagement
Question Is stakeholder engagement included?
Why It Matters Advocacy efforts become more organized
Support & Training
Question Does the provider offer support and training?
Why It Matters Faster adoption improves efficiency

Organizations should also review how quickly the software processes legislative updates from congress and state legislatures.

Fast updates help teams stay ahead of competitors and respond more effectively to policy developments.

How Legislative Tracking Supports Advocacy

Advocacy organizations depend on accurate tracking to influence policy and coordinate outreach.

Legislative tracking helps advocacy groups:

  • Monitor legislation
  • Engage stakeholders
  • Analyze policy changes
  • Organize government relations
  • Respond to committee hearings
  • Support strategic decisions

Strong policy tracking systems also help advocacy organizations communicate with clients and leadership more clearly.

Texas Political Spotlight
This is some text inside of a div block.
Can you make James run a marathon? Every demo booked in April adds a mile to his run on the Texas Capitol grounds. Book a demo. Add a mile.
Happy hour · You’re invited
Join us in celebrating.

You’re invited to celebrate our founder’s birthday with us for happy hour. RSVP and we’ll send you the details.

RSVP to the happy hour →
Best in Government Affairs · Texas
Peer nominated. Peer reviewed.

Unlike other awards, next year you have the chance to win. Just nominate someone you would actually want to work with. See photos and winners from the night.

See the photos and winners →
USLege Best in Government Affairs Texas 2025: peer-reviewed crystal awards lined up before the ceremony
Texas Senate Republican Caucus · Gala & golf tournament
Photos from the night.

USLege was a sponsor. See the full photo set from the gala and golf tournament.

Browse the photos →
For existing customers

Already on USLege? Get a 30-minute walkthrough of what’s new with our wider lens, with your account manager Luke.

Book training with Luke →

This newsletter is AI generated and human reviewed. Strictly nonpartisan. Built on USLege legislative data and verbatim public-record transcripts.

Built with the power of USLege.

USLege, Inc. © 2026 · Austin, TX
How to Choose the Best Federal Legislative Tracking Software for Your Organization
This is some text inside of a div block.

Every year, thousands of bills move through Congress, and without the right tracking system, teams miss critical information that affects compliance, strategy, and advocacy.

Manual tracking creates gaps.

Teams rely on scattered data, delayed alerts, and inconsistent updates, which makes it harder to stay ahead of policy developments.

Modern legislative tracking tools solve this by centralizing legislative and regulatory data, automating bill tracking, and delivering real-time alerts.

They allow organizations to monitor federal legislation, understand the legislative process, and act quickly when changes occur.

In this guide, you’ll learn how to evaluate legislative monitoring platforms, what features matter most, and how policy management solutions help government affairs teams work smarter.

You will also see how to compare tools, avoid mistakes, and choose a system that fits your organization.

After reviewing your current workflow, you can explore a centralized system like federal legislative tracking software

to improve how your team tracks legislation and responds to policy changes.

What Is Federal Legislative Tracking Software?

Federal legislative tracking software is a system that helps organizations track bills, monitor committee hearings, and follow the full legislative process in one place.

It replaces manual spreadsheets with automated tracking, giving users access to accurate and updated data.

Core Functionality Explained

A strong legislative tracking tool provides:

  • Bill tracking across Congress and committees.
  • Real-time alerts when bills move or change.
  • Search tools to filter legislation by keywords or policy areas.
  • Centralized legislative and regulatory data.

Instead of checking multiple sources, users can track bills with just a few clicks.

These systems also:

  • Automate legislative tracking across every legislative session.
  • Provide bill summaries to quickly understand relevance.
  • Deliver alerts when committee hearings or votes are scheduled.
  • Help users stay informed about pending legislation and regulatory changes.

Congress introduces thousands of bills each year.

Without automation, tracking becomes inefficient and error-prone.

Why Organizations Need Legislative Monitoring Platforms

Organizations face constant pressure to monitor federal legislation and regulatory developments.

Missing a policy update can impact compliance, operations, and long-term planning.

Key Use Cases Across Industries

Legislative monitoring platforms support different teams across an organization:

  • Government affairs teams track policy developments and engage with legislators.
  • Public affairs professionals monitor regulatory tracking and advocacy efforts.
  • Legal teams follow regulations and compliance requirements.
  • Corporations track bills that impact stakeholders and clients.

These tools help organizations:

  • Stay ahead of policy changes and regulatory developments.
  • Improve response time with real-time alerts.
  • Support advocacy and government relations strategies.
  • Provide actionable insights for informed decisions.

For example, a public policy manager can monitor policy areas and receive alerts when bills move through committee assignments.

This allows the team to act quickly and ensure their voice is heard during advocacy efforts.

Essential Features to Look For in Policy Management Solutions

Choosing the right legislative tracking tool depends on features that align with your organization and workflow tools.

Real-Time Alerts and Notifications

Real-time alerts are critical for staying informed.

Look for:

  • Alerts for bill movements, amendments, and executive orders.
  • Email alerts and dashboard notifications.
  • Alerts tailored to specific policy areas.

These alerts ensure your team never misses the latest developments.

Advanced Search and Filtering

Search functionality determines how quickly you find relevant results.

Key features include:

  • Keyword-based search across legislative and regulatory data.
  • Filters by committee, sponsor, and legislative session.
  • Ability to track bills across multiple policy areas.

Strong search tools help teams quickly understand what matters.

Data Visualization and Reporting

Advanced reporting turns raw data into useful analysis.

Look for:

  • Legislative dashboards that show trends.
  • Custom reports for stakeholders and clients.
  • Advanced reporting features for deeper analysis.

These features help organizations make informed decisions based on real data.

AI and Predictive Analytics

AI-powered tools are changing how legislative tracking works.

Capabilities include:

  • AI-powered insights that summarize bills.
  • Predictive analysis of policy changes.
  • Detection of trends across legislation.

These tools help policy professionals quickly understand large volumes of data.

Integration Capabilities

Integration improves team collaboration and workflow.

Look for systems that:

  • Connect with CRM and internal workflow tools.
  • Allow teams to assign tasks and share notes.
  • Support team collaboration across departments.

Integration ensures support teams can work together efficiently.

How to Evaluate Federal Legislative Tracking Software

Selecting the right legislative tracking tool requires a clear evaluation process.

Define Your Organization’s Needs

Start by understanding your organization:

  • Size of your team.
  • Type of legislative and regulatory tracking required.
  • Level of engagement in government affairs.

This helps narrow down options.

Compare Features vs Cost

Pricing varies depending on coverage and features.

  • Basic tools may cost around $1,000.
  • Advanced systems can exceed $5,000.

Focus on ROI rather than price alone.

Assess Data Accuracy and Coverage

Accurate data is essential.

Check:

  • Coverage of federal legislation and regulatory data.
  • Frequency of updates from Congress.
  • Quality of bill summaries and analysis.

to understand how legislative information is structured.

User Experience and Support

User experience affects adoption.

Evaluate:

  • Ease of use.
  • Onboarding and support.
  • Ability for teams to collaborate.

A system should help your team work smarter, not harder.

Common Mistakes to Avoid When Choosing Legislative Tracking Systems

Many organizations choose tools without fully evaluating their needs.

Choosing Based on Price Alone

Low-cost tools may lack comprehensive coverage and advanced reporting.

Ignoring Integration Needs

Without integration, workflow tools become disconnected.

Overlooking User Adoption

Complex systems reduce productivity and team collaboration.

Not Testing the Platform

Always request demos or trials.

Testing ensures the tool fits your organization and supports your team.

Key Benefits of Using Federal Legislative Tracking Software

Organizations that adopt legislative tracking tools gain a clear advantage.

Improved Decision-Making

Access to real-time data leads to better analysis and informed decisions.

Time Efficiency

Automation helps teams save time by reducing manual research.

Enhanced Compliance

Tracking regulations and policy changes reduces compliance risks.

Strategic Advantage

Organizations can stay ahead of policy developments and act early.

Benefits include:

  • Faster response to legislation.
  • Better communication with stakeholders.
  • Stronger advocacy and government relations strategies.

Future Trends in Legislative Monitoring Platforms

Legislative tracking continues to evolve with new technology.

AI and Machine Learning Integration

AI-powered systems provide predictive insights and deeper analysis.

Increased Automation

Automation reduces manual tracking and improves efficiency.

Data-Driven Policy Insights

Advanced analytics provide actionable insights into policy changes.

Organizations are shifting toward intelligent platforms that combine data, AI-powered tools, and automation.

How to Implement Legislative Tracking Software Successfully

Implementation determines long-term success.

Onboarding and Training

Train your team to use the system effectively.

Define Monitoring Criteria

Set alerts, keywords, and policy areas to track bills.

Integrate with Existing Systems

Ensure smooth workflow integration and team collaboration.

Proper setup helps organizations maximize value and stay informed.

Texas Political Spotlight
This is some text inside of a div block.
Can you make James run a marathon? Every demo booked in April adds a mile to his run on the Texas Capitol grounds. Book a demo. Add a mile.
Happy hour · You’re invited
Join us in celebrating.

You’re invited to celebrate our founder’s birthday with us for happy hour. RSVP and we’ll send you the details.

RSVP to the happy hour →
Best in Government Affairs · Texas
Peer nominated. Peer reviewed.

Unlike other awards, next year you have the chance to win. Just nominate someone you would actually want to work with. See photos and winners from the night.

See the photos and winners →
USLege Best in Government Affairs Texas 2025: peer-reviewed crystal awards lined up before the ceremony
Texas Senate Republican Caucus · Gala & golf tournament
Photos from the night.

USLege was a sponsor. See the full photo set from the gala and golf tournament.

Browse the photos →
For existing customers

Already on USLege? Get a 30-minute walkthrough of what’s new with our wider lens, with your account manager Luke.

Book training with Luke →

This newsletter is AI generated and human reviewed. Strictly nonpartisan. Built on USLege legislative data and verbatim public-record transcripts.

Built with the power of USLege.

USLege, Inc. © 2026 · Austin, TX
Texas Political Spotlight
This is some text inside of a div block.

Welcome back, friends

Texas hemp businesses have filed suit to block new state regulations they say effectively ban smokeable hemp products and impose licensing fee increases so steep they could force many businesses to close. Yesterday, the Texas House State Affairs Committee heard testimony on the explosive growth of data centers in the state, with interconnection requests on the power grid now exceeding 400,000 megawatts and raising questions about cost, reliability, and water usage. Lastly, nineteen Texas summer camps are challenging a new state mandate requiring them to install fiber optic internet infrastructure, citing costs as high as $1.2 million and arguing the requirement is unworkable for rural properties and does nothing to improve camper safety.

Before you dive in…

USLege will be hosting our first ever Best in Government Affairs Awards Ceremony on April 23rd at Speakeasy in Downtown Austin.

Winners and guests will be treated to evening of celebration for the accomplishments in the 89th Texas Legislative Session.

You can expect music, networking, food & drinks and formal award acceptance.  

This is going to be a fun party! We hope to see you there.

»» RSVP HERE: Best in Government Affairs Awards Ceremony hosted by USLege

»» Watch Representative Ken King’s Intro Here ««

We hope you enjoyed today’s read!

Stay connected with TXLege News on X and LinkedIn!

Texas Political Spotlight
This is some text inside of a div block.

Welcome back, friends

A federal trial is underway in Texas over whether the state's prison system has done enough to protect inmates from extreme heat, with a price tag of $1.5 billion standing at the center of the debate. Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows has tasked a new legislative committee with studying whether Texas could absorb one or more counties from New Mexico, a long-shot proposal that has already drawn a sharp response from the neighboring state's governor. A public feud between Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and acting Comptroller Kelly Hancock has spilled into federal court, where a judge is overseeing the fallout in a lawsuit alleging religious discrimination in the state's $1 billion ESA Program.

We hope you enjoyed today’s read!

Stay connected with TXLege News on X and LinkedIn!