House Race Analyses, Political Climate, Senate Race Analyses
09/10/2018

State and Legislative Races Rated ‘Lean’ or ‘Toss Up’

TXElects

The general election is eight weeks away, and early voting begins six weeks from today.

Traditionally, we have rated contested elections on a 5-star scale, which one star indicating a very low-interest race with no chance of flipping and five stars indicating a high-interest race with a relatively high likelihood of flipping. Our Crib Sheets still reflect these ratings. In this analysis, we use the more frequently employed seven-point scale that divides seats into strong, likely, leaning and toss up categories.

Of the 215 federal, statewide and legislative seats on the ballot, we rate 156 as either strong Republican (92) or strong Democrat (64). Of those, 16 Republican and 30 Democratic candidates are unopposed, which is lower than in a typical election year. We rate 33 Republican and 3 Democrat-held seats as “likely” to remain with their respective parties. That leaves 22 seats we rate as either “leaning” (13 Republican, 2 Democratic) or “toss up” (7 Republican) on the general election ballot. We also rate next week’s SD19 special runoff election as “toss up.”

Today we look at state and legislative races. Tomorrow, we will look at the U.S. Senate and congressional races.

Statewide Races

Aside from the U.S. Senate race, we rate all other statewide races as “strong Republican” except for Attorney General and Agriculture Commission, which we rate as “likely Republican.” Atty. Gen. Ken Paxton (R) is under criminal indictment – the meandering case shows few signs of forward progress – and Comm. Sid Miller (R) has received several bouts of negative press during his term. Nonetheless, both of those races are much closer to “strong” than they are to “leaning.”

Texas Senate

The chamber’s only “toss up” race is not on the general election ballot. Early voting is underway for the September 18 special runoff election between Pleasanton retired game warden Pete Flores (R) and former Rep. and U.S. Rep. Pete Galleo (D-Alpine). The winner will serve the unexpired term of former Sen. Carlos Uresti (D-San Antonio), which expires in 2020. The district would lean Democratic if it were a general election, but Gov. Greg Abbott (R) called an emergency special election instead of waiting until November. We rate it a “toss up” because of the likely low turnout, especially from Democratic precincts in Bexar Co., and coordinated efforts by Republican leaders to turn out their vote.

We rate SD10, held by Sen. Konni Burton (R-Colleyville), and SD16, held by Sen. Don Huffines (D-Dallas), as “lean Republican.” In SD10, Beverly Powell (D) raised more than $500K as of June 30, which is about three quarters the amount raised by Burton. The district had the smallest straight-party advantage of any Republican-held seat in 2014, and Democrats closed the gap by more than half between 2012 and 2016. Former Sen. Wendy Davis (D-Fort Worth) was re-elected to the seat, as the district is currently configured, in 2012.

Relative to the state as a whole, SD16 has gotten nearly 10% more Democratic since 2002, highest of any Senate district. In 2016, the district was 3% bluer than the state, second only to Burton’s SD10. Democrat Nathan Johnson raised nearly $600K as of June 30, about 63% as much as Huffines, and more than any general election challenger facing an incumbent since Davis in 2008, as of June 30 of their respective election years. SD16 also has several overlapping hot races, including nearly two-thirds of CD32 and large swaths of HD102, HD108, HD114 and HD115.

We rate SD8 open (Angela Paxton), SD17 (Sen. Joan Huffman) and SD25 (Sen. Donna Campbell) as “likely Republican.” SD17 is the closest of these to “lean Republican.” Huffman has a greater edge in fundraising than either Burton or Huffines. The district is growing friendlier to Democrats but has much farther to go to become truly competitive. There is also less overlap of competitive races than in most other “lean” and “toss up” races. SD8 could move toward “lean” territory if Democratic down-ballot challengers show strong fundraising numbers early next month.

Texas House of Representatives

We rate seven Republican-held seats as “lean Republican,” five Republican-held seats as “toss up” and two Democrat-held seats as “lean Democratic.” Eight of these 14 seats are in Dallas Co., which we expect will be the biggest battleground of the election cycle. Three are in Harris Co., two are in Williamson Co. and one is in Travis Co.

We rate three Dallas Co. seats as “toss ups”:

  • HD105, held by Rep. Rodney Anderson (R-Grand Prairie)
  • HD114 open, where Lisa Luby Ryan (R) ousted Rep. Jason Villalba (R-Dallas) in the Republican primary; and
  • HD115, held by Rep. Matt Rinaldi (R-Irving).

Anderson and Rinaldi were among five Texas legislators to win re-election in 2016 despite facing a deficit in straight-party voting.

In 2016, HD105 was nearly 9 points more Democratic than the state as a whole, the highest percentage for any Republican-held seat. More than 3,500 more people voted straight-party Democratic in 2016 than in 2012 while the number of straight-party Republican votes fell by nearly 800. The resulting shift flipped the straight-party advantage toward the Democrats. Anderson needed 62% of the full-ballot vote to make up a 3,344-vote deficit in order to eke out Terry Meza (D) by 56 votes. She is running again this year but lags behind in fundraising.

In HD115, Rinaldi received 57% of the full-ballot vote to overcome an 1,835-vote deficit and prevail by a little over 1K votes. The precincts that comprise the district today have shifted their political views dramatically since 2002, when they were nearly 13 points redder than the state as a whole. By 2016, the district was 6 points bluer than the state as a whole, the second largest blue shift of any Republican-held district (HD136, see below). Rinaldi’s challenger, Addison attorney Julie Johnson, has out-raised Rinaldi nearly 3-to-1 for the election cycle (as of June 30). She is the only state House challenger to out-raise an incumbent in this cycle so far.

HD114 has followed a similar, though less dramatic, partisan arc as HD115, going from 7 points redder than the state in 2002 to 3.5 points bluer in 2016. Villalba outperformed other Republicans on the ticket in his district in 2016, including presidential nominee Donald Trump, who received 8,357 fewer votes than Villalba (Hillary Clinton carried HD114 with 52% of the vote.). However, Villalba is not on the ballot. Dallas attorney John Turner had a $91K advantage in cash on hand as of June 30 and, as of that time, had raised 82% of the amount raised by Ryan.

We rate HD134, held by Rep. Sarah Davis (R-Houston), and HD136, held by Rep. Tony Dale (R-Cedar Park), as “toss up” seats. Davis has proven herself adept at winning support from voters who might otherwise vote Democratic. In 2016, Davis received more votes than any other contested candidate on the ballot in the district except for Justice Eva Guzman (R) and Clinton. We estimate that around one out of every six voters cast ballots for Clinton and Davis. That alone would normally keep her off this list except for the incredible shift in straight-party voting toward the Democrats. Between 2012 and 2016, the number of straight-party Democratic votes increased 49% while straight Republican votes fell 4%. In four years, the Republican straight-party advantage dropped from nearly 12K to just 3K, the largest such swing for a Republican-held House district over that period. Whether the race remains a “toss up” will depend on the next fundraising reports. Houston oil and gas executive Allison Sawyer had raised less than 10% the amount Davis has raised through June 30, a figure well below the historical percentage below which a candidate’s chance of flipping a seat is considered viable.

In rapidly growing Williamson Co., HD136 has likewise seen a significant erosion in the Republican straight-party advantage, dropping from more than 7K in 2012 to 2K in 2016. That year, Dale’s district was the sixth bluest of any seat won by a Republican, ranking below only HD105, HD102 (which we’ll discuss in a moment), HD113 (likewise), HD115 and HD134. Dale was the highest Republican vote-getter for federal or state office on the ballot in a district Clinton won by 2.5 points and most Republicans received less than 50% of the vote. He faces Cedar Park businessman John Bucy, whom he defeated in 2014. Bucy has already raised more this year than during that entire election cycle. It’s worth noting that Libertarian candidates received an average of 7% of the vote in this district when facing a Democrat and a Republican, well above their statewide averages. There was no Libertarian candidate in 2016. This year, Libertarian Zach Parks is on the ballot.

Returning to Dallas Co., we rate four seats as “lean Republican” and one as “lean Democrat”:

  • HD102, held by Rep. Linda Koop (R-Dallas)
  • HD107, held by Rep. Victoria Neave (D-Dallas)
  • HD108, held by Rep. Morgan Meyer (R-Dallas)
  • HD112, held by Rep. Angie Chen Button (R-Garland); and
  • HD113 open, where Garland attorney Jonathan Boos (R) is seeking to hold the seat being vacated by Rep. Cindy Burkett (R-Sunnyvale).

We’ll begin by briefly touching on HD107. It is on the list because it was won by a Republican in 2014 and the freshman incumbent was arrested in June 2017 for driving while intoxicated. She faces Mesquite attorney Deanna Metzger, a conservative endorsed in the Republican primary by Empower Texans PAC, Texas Right to Life PAC and other movement conservative groups. Like several other Dallas Co. districts, it has been trending toward the Democrats over the years, shifting from 5% redder than the state as a whole in 2002 to 8% bluer in 2016. Yet, it remains one of two best pick-up hopes for Republicans.

Koop overcame a straight-ticket voting deficit to keep HD102 in 2016, when it was the second bluest district won by a Republican. Since 2002, the district’s current precincts have shifted from 10% redder than the state to 6% bluer. Like HD105, Democrats flipped the straight-party advantage in 2016, making up nearly 5K votes net against Republicans in that time. The district would have been rated a “toss up” except that Koop’s opponent, Richardson attorney Ana Maria Ramos, lags far behind in fundraising.

That HD108 is on this list is a bit remarkable. Anchored on the Park Cities, HD108 maintains the highest Republican straight-party advantage of the House districts discussed here. In 2016, that advantage was 6K votes, barely half of what it was four years earlier, yet Clinton defeated Trump by 6 points. Meyer faced only Libertarian opposition that year. Women voters could be decisive this time, and Meyer is one of 65 Republican men being challenged by a Democratic woman. University adjunct professor Joanna Cattanach raised about a third the amount Meyer had raised as of June 30.

Democrats nearly erased the Republican straight-party advantage in HD112 in 2016, chopping a nearly 5K-vote advantage to less than 500. Like many other Dallas Co. districts, HD112 is trending bluer, shifting from 7 points redder than the state in 2002 to 4 points bluer in 2016. Harder to track is Button’s performance relative to other Republicans in the district. Other than 2016, she has not faced a Democratic opponent since 2008. In that year, she received 56% to the Democrat’s 40%. In 2016, she defeated Jack Blackshear, 57%-43%. He raised just over $10K for the race. Button’s current Democratic opponent, Garland attorney and mediator Brandy Chambers, raised nearly 10 times that amount as of June 30.

As with the other Dallas Co. districts mentioned here, HD113 has also seen an erosion of Republican straight-party advantage as it shifted from 6% redder than the state as a whole in 2002 to 6% bluer in 2016. Burkett won around 70% of the vote from full-ballot voters – people who do not cast a straight-party vote – to defeat Rowlett community organizer Rhetta Bowers, 55%-45%. Burkett is not on the ballot this year, but Bowers is. She faces Garland attorney Jonathan Boos, an Empower Texans-backed conservative who lost to Burkett in the 2016 Republican primary. Bowers lags behind her 2016 fundraising pace but no longer faces an incumbent with crossover appeal.

Three other state House seats are rated as “lean Republican”:

  • HD47, held by Rep. Paul Workman (R-Austin)
  • HD52 open, where Cynthia Flores (R) is seeking to succeed former Rep. Larry Gonzales (R-Round Rock); and
  • HD138, held by Rep. Dwayne Bohac (R-Houston).

All three are slightly bluer than the state as a whole and are trending toward the Democrats. Workman’s HD47 is the lone Republican district in blue Travis Co., yet Trump carried the district by just 180 votes over Clinton. Workman’s vote total was in line with other Republicans running in the district against an opponent whom he out-raised, $682K to $24K. This year he faces Austin real estate agent Vikki Goodwin, who raised $138K as of June 30. Goodwin still trails Workman in contributions, but women voters could help overcome that gap. As far as straight-party voting goes, Republicans held a 6K-vote advantage in 2016, half of what it was in 2012.

Trump carried HD52 by 1K votes over Clinton while Republicans otherwise carried the district by around 6K votes. More than 7K more people cast straight-party Democratic votes in 2016 than in 2012, outpacing Republican growth by more than 2K votes. Flores, who Gonzales endorsed before the primary, faces Round Rock education nonprofit executive James Talarico, who had raised nearly $200K as of June 30. The district is a battleground for the competitive CD31 seat between longtime U.S. Rep. John Carter (R-Round Rock) and Round Rock nonprofit executive and former military pilot M.J. Hegar.

In HD138, Democrats cut a 7.5K-vote deficit in straight-party voting from 2012 into just a 2.5K-vote deficit in 2016. The number of straight-party Democratic voters increased 37% while the number of straight-party Republican voters fell 3%. As it is currently configured, HD138 has shifted from 13 points redder than the state in 2002 to 3 points bluer in 2016, with a significant amount of that jump occurring in the last couple of election cycles. Clinton won the district by 36 votes over Trump. Four years earlier, Mitt Romney carried the district by 20 points over President Obama. Bohac was unopposed in 2016, but now he faces Houston attorney Adam Milasincic, who raised $121K as of June 30, more than 60% the amount raised by Bohac.

Our final “lean Democratic” seat is HD144, which has changed partisan hands in every election cycle since it was drawn in 2012. Obama carried the district by 3 points in 2012, when Rep. Mary Ann Perez (D-Houston) was first elected, 52%-46%. Two years later, Greg Abbott defeated Wendy Davis by 5 points in the district, and Perez lost to Gilbert Peña by 152 votes. Turnout that year was 22%, one of the lowest in the state. Two years later, in rematch, Perez defeated Peña, 60%-40%, and Clinton carried the district by 19 points. Perez faces Ruben Villarreal, who has raised $25K as of June 30, well short of Perez’s $129K.

©2018 Texas Election Source LLC

🎙️We Have a Podcast! 🎙️

Bills and Business is your go-to podcast for conversations related to Texas legislation and business. Hosted by Laura Carr, Co-Founder of USLege—an AI-driven legislative tracking software—we bring you in-depth analysis on economic trends, impactful legislation, and key developments shaping Texas business.

Subscribe on Youtube and Spotify for weekly episodes!

🔍 USLege - The Only AI-First Political Tracking Solution ✨

USLege helps you track legislation and find what you need faster from bills, committee hearings, floor debates, and state agency meetings faster.

Say goodbye to tedious tasks!

You can follow USLege on LinkedIn, Facebook, and X.

🤝 Texas Association of Business 📈

Texas Association of Business (TAB) is the Texas State Chamber, representing companies of every size and industry. TAB’s purpose is to champion the best business climate in the world, unleashing the power of free enterprise to enhance lives for generations.

You can follow TAB on LinkedIn, Facebook, and X.

Table of Content
  1. 01 First
Trusted by Government Affairs Professionals and Corporate Policy Teams
Blog & Articles

Read more news

How to Choose the Best Legislative Tracking Software for Your Organization
This is some text inside of a div block.

In today’s fast-paced policy environment, staying informed is a constant challenge. Bills, hearings, and regulatory updates move quickly across jurisdictions, creating risks for organizations that rely on timely information, including the risk of missing important information when relying on manual processes. Choosing the best legislative tracking software is one of the most effective ways to manage legislative and regulatory tracking efficiently, minimize missed opportunities, and strengthen decision-making.

This article walks you through how to evaluate legislative and regulatory tools, compare coverage and capabilities, and understand which features help government affairs professionals and public affairs teams stay informed and a step ahead of rapid change. You’ll learn how to assess software platforms, review vendor performance, and apply a clear framework to guide your organization’s choice.

If you’re exploring modern solutions for policy monitoring, visit the best legislative tracking software to see how advanced systems help professionals track activity and analyze critical information across multiple jurisdictions.

Why Legislative Tracking Software Matters

Every legislative session brings thousands of new bills and hearings across the federal government, state legislatures, and local governments. For government affairs teams and law firms that must monitor state legislation or track regulations, the pace of change can be overwhelming.

Without digital platforms, staff may spend hours each day manually searching databases, reading committee reports, and updating spreadsheets. That process isn’t just inefficient—it’s risky. Missing one act or amendment could affect compliance, advocacy strategy, or even public reputation. Relying on manual tracking increases the chance of overlooking important details in legislative information, which can lead to missing critical updates or changes.

The Challenge of Volume and Velocity

  • Legislative and regulatory tracking spans bills, hearings, amendments, and regulations that appear daily.
  • Strategic decisions depend on access to verified data and real-time alerts.
  • Regulatory developments from government agencies can impact clients and advocacy groups instantly.

The Payoff

Automated tracking saves time, reduces human error, and delivers actionable insights faster. Teams can filter results, share updates, and focus their attention where it matters most—on influencing policy and shaping outcomes.

Key Features and Capabilities to Look For

Choosing the right tracking platform starts with understanding what differentiates effective tools from simple alert systems. Below are core features to evaluate before purchasing or implementing any solution.

Coverage Across Jurisdictions

The best systems provide a broad jurisdictional reach—from federal legislation to state legislative hearings and local government acts. Before committing, confirm whether the platform includes:

  • Federal and state legislation: Bills, amendments, regulations, hearings, and newly introduced bills, with Congress as a key source for federal legislative tracking.
  • Regulatory activity: Notices from agencies and committees.
  • Comprehensive data sources: Congressional records, local archives, and state portals.

Understanding the dynamic nature of Capitol Hill is crucial, as legislative activity and staff turnover at the federal level can significantly impact advocacy strategies and tracking efforts.

If your team must monitor state legislation, check that the vendor’s coverage includes smaller states and municipalities that frequently pass niche regulations.

Real Time Alerts and Notifications

Fast updates are critical for professionals who manage compliance or advocacy campaigns. Strong systems offer:

  • Instant email alerts for bill introductions, amendments, or new hearings.
  • Custom filters for topics, sponsors, committees, or jurisdictions.
  • Real-time dashboards showing where legislation is moving next.
  • Collaboration tools so teams can assign follow-up actions or comments.

With real-time alerts, government affairs professionals and policy experts can respond before deadlines pass—ensuring that organizations stay ahead and fully informed.

Analytics, Reporting, and Insight Generation

Good tracking isn’t just about collecting raw data. It’s about turning that data into useful analysis. A well-built platform helps users:

  • Create trend dashboards showing activity by topic, legislator, or region.
  • Generate reports to brief clients, executives, or advocacy groups.
  • Use artificial intelligence to compare bills, predict movement, or analyze outcomes.
  • Access historical data for longitudinal analysis.

By combining analytics with visualization tools, organizations gain the context needed to make strategic decisions quickly.

Artificial Intelligence in Legislative Tracking

Artificial intelligence transforms how government affairs professionals and government relations teams approach legislative tracking. By harnessing AI, organizations can analyze massive volumes of legislative and regulatory data in real time, ensuring that no critical bill or regulation goes unnoticed. AI-powered tools can automatically identify and prioritize bills that align with an organization’s advocacy goals, generate personalized bill summaries, and even predict the likelihood of legislative movement—all with minimal manual intervention.

For government relations professionals, this means less time spent sifting through raw data and more time focusing on strategy, stakeholder engagement, and influencing policy outcomes. AI-driven platforms can scan every legislative chamber, flagging new bills and regulations that matter most to your organization. These actionable insights empower teams to stay ahead of policy developments, respond quickly to emerging issues, and confidently make strategic decisions. As artificial intelligence continues to evolve, it will play an increasingly vital role in helping professionals track legislation, analyze regulatory trends, and drive effective advocacy across all levels of government.

Ease of Use and Vendor Support

Complex systems often fail because users find them hard to operate. When evaluating tracking software, consider:

  • Intuitive search functions and clear navigation.
  • Vendor training, documentation, and help-desk responsiveness.
  • Implementation timelines and onboarding resources.
  • Integration options with CRM, compliance, or reporting platforms.

The easier the interface, the more likely professionals across departments—legal, advocacy, and communications—will actually use it.

Security and Data Protection

When it comes to legislative tracking, security and data protection are non-negotiable for government affairs professionals and organizations. The sensitive nature of legislative and regulatory data—combined with the need for accurate, up-to-date information—means that robust security measures are essential. Leading legislative tracking platforms employ advanced encryption, secure servers, and strict access controls to ensure that only authorized users can access critical information.

In addition, reputable platforms adhere to industry best practices and compliance standards, safeguarding client data from unauthorized access or breaches. This commitment to security allows government relations professionals to focus on their core strategy and advocacy efforts, knowing that their data is protected at every step. By selecting a platform with proven security protocols, organizations can confidently manage their legislative tracking activities and maintain the trust of stakeholders, clients, and team members.

Integration with Other Tools

For government affairs professionals, efficiency and collaboration are key to successful advocacy. That’s why seamless integration between legislative tracking platforms and other essential tools—such as CRM systems, email clients, and social media monitoring software—is so valuable. Integrated platforms enable government relations professionals to track bills, monitor legislator interactions, and analyze advocacy campaigns all in one place, reducing manual data entry and streamlining workflows.

By connecting legislative tracking with CRM systems, organizations can maintain a comprehensive record of stakeholder engagement, track the progress of key bills, and measure the impact of their advocacy efforts. Integration with communication tools also ensures that teams can quickly share updates, assign tasks, and coordinate responses to legislative developments. Ultimately, these integrations help government affairs teams stay ahead of policy changes, maximize efficiency, and deliver more effective results for their organizations and clients.

Cost, Scalability, and ROI

Pricing varies widely across platforms. Some charge by user, others by jurisdiction. Evaluate:

  • Scalability: Can you expand access as new teams join?
  • Hidden costs: Extra fees for integrations or data exports.
  • ROI: Measure efficiency gains, reduced research hours, and improved regulatory compliance.

The right investment pays for itself through faster tracking, stronger insight, and better policy outcomes.

Building Your Decision-Making Checklist

A structured checklist helps teams evaluate multiple vendors objectively. Consider the following steps:

  1. Define scope: Identify which government levels—federal, state, local—your organization must monitor.
  2. Map stakeholders: Determine which departments, clients, professionals, or legislators need access to legislative tracking information.
  3. Create a scoring system: Rate vendors on coverage, alerts, analytics, ease of use, and cost.
  4. Request demos: Ask vendors to show how their tools track legislation and deliver reports.
  5. Review accuracy: Compare automated alerts to official legislative portals to confirm reliability.
  6. Pilot the system: Run a short test during a legislative session to evaluate performance.

This structured review allows government relations professionals and policy experts to make choices based on measurable evidence, not sales claims.

Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them

Even sophisticated organizations can stumble during implementation. Watch for these frequent errors:

  • Assuming full coverage: Some systems exclude local governments or agency regulations. This can result in missing important government actions, leaving you unaware of key legislative or regulatory developments.
  • Overloading users: Too many irrelevant alerts lead to fatigue.
  • Ignoring integration: Platforms that don’t connect to existing tools reduce efficiency.
  • Underestimating training: Teams may resist new systems without clear onboarding.
  • Skipping metrics: Without KPIs, you can’t analyze ROI or improvement.

Avoiding these issues keeps your strategy grounded in real performance data.

Implementation Best Practices and Maximizing Value

Rolling out a new tracking platform works best when everyone understands the process. Follow these steps:

  • Stakeholder alignment: Engage government affairs, legal, and communications teams early.
  • Define taxonomy: Standardize issue tags, committees, and jurisdiction names.
  • Workflow mapping: Assign ownership for monitoring, escalation, and communication.
  • Training: Offer live sessions and short guides to reinforce adoption.
  • Continuous review: Revisit settings each quarter to refine alerts and search filters.

As policy cycles shift, ongoing optimization ensures that your system remains accurate, relevant, and responsive to regulatory developments.

For additional insight on how legislative and regulatory tools operate, review the NCSL’s bill tracking overview, which explains how professionals track state legislation effectively.

Future of Legislative Tracking

The future of legislative tracking is bright, with rapid advancements in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and data analytics reshaping how government affairs professionals and organizations monitor and influence policy. As the demand for real-time, data-driven insights grows, legislative tracking tools will become even more sophisticated—offering predictive analytics, automated reporting, and deeper integration with other advocacy platforms.

We can expect to see greater adoption of cloud-based solutions, enhanced security features, and more intuitive user interfaces that make it easier for government relations professionals to access and analyze critical information. The integration of legislative tracking with CRM, communication, and analytics tools will provide a unified view of advocacy efforts, enabling teams to coordinate strategy and engage stakeholders more effectively.

As the policy landscape evolves, staying ahead of legislative and regulatory developments will be essential for organizations seeking to influence legislation and achieve their advocacy goals. By embracing the latest technologies and innovations, government affairs professionals can ensure they remain agile, informed, and ready to drive meaningful impact in an ever-changing environment.

Texas Political Spotlight
This is some text inside of a div block.

Welcome back, friends

Texas voters approved one of the largest property tax relief packages in state history on Tuesday, raising the homestead exemption to $140,000 and granting new tax breaks for seniors, people with disabilities, and small businesses. In Austin, residents rejected Proposition Q, a plan to fund public safety, homelessness programs, and city facility initiatives through a property tax hike, forcing city leaders to rework the budget and brace for service cuts. Meanwhile, Bexar County voters narrowly passed Propositions A and B, greenlighting up to $311 million in tourism-funded support for a new downtown Spurs arena and upgrades to the Freeman Coliseum grounds.

We hope you enjoyed today’s read!

Stay connected with TXLege News on X and LinkedIn!

Texas Political Spotlight
This is some text inside of a div block.

Welcome back friends,

Former Vice President Dick Cheney, one of the most influential and controversial figures in modern American politics, has died at 84, remembered by former President George W. Bush as a “patriot” whose intellect and conviction shaped decades of U.S. policy. In Texas, the Education Agency announced a sweeping takeover of Fort Worth ISD, the state’s second-largest intervention, citing years of academic underperformance and plans to install new local managers. And in Washington, a United Airlines flight was evacuated after a bomb threat, prompting an FBI investigation that later found no explosives, allowing operations to resume safely.

We hope you enjoyed today’s read!

Stay connected with TXLege News on X and LinkedIn!