House Race Analyses, Political Climate, Senate Race Analyses
09/10/2018

State and Legislative Races Rated ‘Lean’ or ‘Toss Up’

TXElects

The general election is eight weeks away, and early voting begins six weeks from today.

Traditionally, we have rated contested elections on a 5-star scale, which one star indicating a very low-interest race with no chance of flipping and five stars indicating a high-interest race with a relatively high likelihood of flipping. Our Crib Sheets still reflect these ratings. In this analysis, we use the more frequently employed seven-point scale that divides seats into strong, likely, leaning and toss up categories.

Of the 215 federal, statewide and legislative seats on the ballot, we rate 156 as either strong Republican (92) or strong Democrat (64). Of those, 16 Republican and 30 Democratic candidates are unopposed, which is lower than in a typical election year. We rate 33 Republican and 3 Democrat-held seats as “likely” to remain with their respective parties. That leaves 22 seats we rate as either “leaning” (13 Republican, 2 Democratic) or “toss up” (7 Republican) on the general election ballot. We also rate next week’s SD19 special runoff election as “toss up.”

Today we look at state and legislative races. Tomorrow, we will look at the U.S. Senate and congressional races.

Statewide Races

Aside from the U.S. Senate race, we rate all other statewide races as “strong Republican” except for Attorney General and Agriculture Commission, which we rate as “likely Republican.” Atty. Gen. Ken Paxton (R) is under criminal indictment – the meandering case shows few signs of forward progress – and Comm. Sid Miller (R) has received several bouts of negative press during his term. Nonetheless, both of those races are much closer to “strong” than they are to “leaning.”

Texas Senate

The chamber’s only “toss up” race is not on the general election ballot. Early voting is underway for the September 18 special runoff election between Pleasanton retired game warden Pete Flores (R) and former Rep. and U.S. Rep. Pete Galleo (D-Alpine). The winner will serve the unexpired term of former Sen. Carlos Uresti (D-San Antonio), which expires in 2020. The district would lean Democratic if it were a general election, but Gov. Greg Abbott (R) called an emergency special election instead of waiting until November. We rate it a “toss up” because of the likely low turnout, especially from Democratic precincts in Bexar Co., and coordinated efforts by Republican leaders to turn out their vote.

We rate SD10, held by Sen. Konni Burton (R-Colleyville), and SD16, held by Sen. Don Huffines (D-Dallas), as “lean Republican.” In SD10, Beverly Powell (D) raised more than $500K as of June 30, which is about three quarters the amount raised by Burton. The district had the smallest straight-party advantage of any Republican-held seat in 2014, and Democrats closed the gap by more than half between 2012 and 2016. Former Sen. Wendy Davis (D-Fort Worth) was re-elected to the seat, as the district is currently configured, in 2012.

Relative to the state as a whole, SD16 has gotten nearly 10% more Democratic since 2002, highest of any Senate district. In 2016, the district was 3% bluer than the state, second only to Burton’s SD10. Democrat Nathan Johnson raised nearly $600K as of June 30, about 63% as much as Huffines, and more than any general election challenger facing an incumbent since Davis in 2008, as of June 30 of their respective election years. SD16 also has several overlapping hot races, including nearly two-thirds of CD32 and large swaths of HD102, HD108, HD114 and HD115.

We rate SD8 open (Angela Paxton), SD17 (Sen. Joan Huffman) and SD25 (Sen. Donna Campbell) as “likely Republican.” SD17 is the closest of these to “lean Republican.” Huffman has a greater edge in fundraising than either Burton or Huffines. The district is growing friendlier to Democrats but has much farther to go to become truly competitive. There is also less overlap of competitive races than in most other “lean” and “toss up” races. SD8 could move toward “lean” territory if Democratic down-ballot challengers show strong fundraising numbers early next month.

Texas House of Representatives

We rate seven Republican-held seats as “lean Republican,” five Republican-held seats as “toss up” and two Democrat-held seats as “lean Democratic.” Eight of these 14 seats are in Dallas Co., which we expect will be the biggest battleground of the election cycle. Three are in Harris Co., two are in Williamson Co. and one is in Travis Co.

We rate three Dallas Co. seats as “toss ups”:

  • HD105, held by Rep. Rodney Anderson (R-Grand Prairie)
  • HD114 open, where Lisa Luby Ryan (R) ousted Rep. Jason Villalba (R-Dallas) in the Republican primary; and
  • HD115, held by Rep. Matt Rinaldi (R-Irving).

Anderson and Rinaldi were among five Texas legislators to win re-election in 2016 despite facing a deficit in straight-party voting.

In 2016, HD105 was nearly 9 points more Democratic than the state as a whole, the highest percentage for any Republican-held seat. More than 3,500 more people voted straight-party Democratic in 2016 than in 2012 while the number of straight-party Republican votes fell by nearly 800. The resulting shift flipped the straight-party advantage toward the Democrats. Anderson needed 62% of the full-ballot vote to make up a 3,344-vote deficit in order to eke out Terry Meza (D) by 56 votes. She is running again this year but lags behind in fundraising.

In HD115, Rinaldi received 57% of the full-ballot vote to overcome an 1,835-vote deficit and prevail by a little over 1K votes. The precincts that comprise the district today have shifted their political views dramatically since 2002, when they were nearly 13 points redder than the state as a whole. By 2016, the district was 6 points bluer than the state as a whole, the second largest blue shift of any Republican-held district (HD136, see below). Rinaldi’s challenger, Addison attorney Julie Johnson, has out-raised Rinaldi nearly 3-to-1 for the election cycle (as of June 30). She is the only state House challenger to out-raise an incumbent in this cycle so far.

HD114 has followed a similar, though less dramatic, partisan arc as HD115, going from 7 points redder than the state in 2002 to 3.5 points bluer in 2016. Villalba outperformed other Republicans on the ticket in his district in 2016, including presidential nominee Donald Trump, who received 8,357 fewer votes than Villalba (Hillary Clinton carried HD114 with 52% of the vote.). However, Villalba is not on the ballot. Dallas attorney John Turner had a $91K advantage in cash on hand as of June 30 and, as of that time, had raised 82% of the amount raised by Ryan.

We rate HD134, held by Rep. Sarah Davis (R-Houston), and HD136, held by Rep. Tony Dale (R-Cedar Park), as “toss up” seats. Davis has proven herself adept at winning support from voters who might otherwise vote Democratic. In 2016, Davis received more votes than any other contested candidate on the ballot in the district except for Justice Eva Guzman (R) and Clinton. We estimate that around one out of every six voters cast ballots for Clinton and Davis. That alone would normally keep her off this list except for the incredible shift in straight-party voting toward the Democrats. Between 2012 and 2016, the number of straight-party Democratic votes increased 49% while straight Republican votes fell 4%. In four years, the Republican straight-party advantage dropped from nearly 12K to just 3K, the largest such swing for a Republican-held House district over that period. Whether the race remains a “toss up” will depend on the next fundraising reports. Houston oil and gas executive Allison Sawyer had raised less than 10% the amount Davis has raised through June 30, a figure well below the historical percentage below which a candidate’s chance of flipping a seat is considered viable.

In rapidly growing Williamson Co., HD136 has likewise seen a significant erosion in the Republican straight-party advantage, dropping from more than 7K in 2012 to 2K in 2016. That year, Dale’s district was the sixth bluest of any seat won by a Republican, ranking below only HD105, HD102 (which we’ll discuss in a moment), HD113 (likewise), HD115 and HD134. Dale was the highest Republican vote-getter for federal or state office on the ballot in a district Clinton won by 2.5 points and most Republicans received less than 50% of the vote. He faces Cedar Park businessman John Bucy, whom he defeated in 2014. Bucy has already raised more this year than during that entire election cycle. It’s worth noting that Libertarian candidates received an average of 7% of the vote in this district when facing a Democrat and a Republican, well above their statewide averages. There was no Libertarian candidate in 2016. This year, Libertarian Zach Parks is on the ballot.

Returning to Dallas Co., we rate four seats as “lean Republican” and one as “lean Democrat”:

  • HD102, held by Rep. Linda Koop (R-Dallas)
  • HD107, held by Rep. Victoria Neave (D-Dallas)
  • HD108, held by Rep. Morgan Meyer (R-Dallas)
  • HD112, held by Rep. Angie Chen Button (R-Garland); and
  • HD113 open, where Garland attorney Jonathan Boos (R) is seeking to hold the seat being vacated by Rep. Cindy Burkett (R-Sunnyvale).

We’ll begin by briefly touching on HD107. It is on the list because it was won by a Republican in 2014 and the freshman incumbent was arrested in June 2017 for driving while intoxicated. She faces Mesquite attorney Deanna Metzger, a conservative endorsed in the Republican primary by Empower Texans PAC, Texas Right to Life PAC and other movement conservative groups. Like several other Dallas Co. districts, it has been trending toward the Democrats over the years, shifting from 5% redder than the state as a whole in 2002 to 8% bluer in 2016. Yet, it remains one of two best pick-up hopes for Republicans.

Koop overcame a straight-ticket voting deficit to keep HD102 in 2016, when it was the second bluest district won by a Republican. Since 2002, the district’s current precincts have shifted from 10% redder than the state to 6% bluer. Like HD105, Democrats flipped the straight-party advantage in 2016, making up nearly 5K votes net against Republicans in that time. The district would have been rated a “toss up” except that Koop’s opponent, Richardson attorney Ana Maria Ramos, lags far behind in fundraising.

That HD108 is on this list is a bit remarkable. Anchored on the Park Cities, HD108 maintains the highest Republican straight-party advantage of the House districts discussed here. In 2016, that advantage was 6K votes, barely half of what it was four years earlier, yet Clinton defeated Trump by 6 points. Meyer faced only Libertarian opposition that year. Women voters could be decisive this time, and Meyer is one of 65 Republican men being challenged by a Democratic woman. University adjunct professor Joanna Cattanach raised about a third the amount Meyer had raised as of June 30.

Democrats nearly erased the Republican straight-party advantage in HD112 in 2016, chopping a nearly 5K-vote advantage to less than 500. Like many other Dallas Co. districts, HD112 is trending bluer, shifting from 7 points redder than the state in 2002 to 4 points bluer in 2016. Harder to track is Button’s performance relative to other Republicans in the district. Other than 2016, she has not faced a Democratic opponent since 2008. In that year, she received 56% to the Democrat’s 40%. In 2016, she defeated Jack Blackshear, 57%-43%. He raised just over $10K for the race. Button’s current Democratic opponent, Garland attorney and mediator Brandy Chambers, raised nearly 10 times that amount as of June 30.

As with the other Dallas Co. districts mentioned here, HD113 has also seen an erosion of Republican straight-party advantage as it shifted from 6% redder than the state as a whole in 2002 to 6% bluer in 2016. Burkett won around 70% of the vote from full-ballot voters – people who do not cast a straight-party vote – to defeat Rowlett community organizer Rhetta Bowers, 55%-45%. Burkett is not on the ballot this year, but Bowers is. She faces Garland attorney Jonathan Boos, an Empower Texans-backed conservative who lost to Burkett in the 2016 Republican primary. Bowers lags behind her 2016 fundraising pace but no longer faces an incumbent with crossover appeal.

Three other state House seats are rated as “lean Republican”:

  • HD47, held by Rep. Paul Workman (R-Austin)
  • HD52 open, where Cynthia Flores (R) is seeking to succeed former Rep. Larry Gonzales (R-Round Rock); and
  • HD138, held by Rep. Dwayne Bohac (R-Houston).

All three are slightly bluer than the state as a whole and are trending toward the Democrats. Workman’s HD47 is the lone Republican district in blue Travis Co., yet Trump carried the district by just 180 votes over Clinton. Workman’s vote total was in line with other Republicans running in the district against an opponent whom he out-raised, $682K to $24K. This year he faces Austin real estate agent Vikki Goodwin, who raised $138K as of June 30. Goodwin still trails Workman in contributions, but women voters could help overcome that gap. As far as straight-party voting goes, Republicans held a 6K-vote advantage in 2016, half of what it was in 2012.

Trump carried HD52 by 1K votes over Clinton while Republicans otherwise carried the district by around 6K votes. More than 7K more people cast straight-party Democratic votes in 2016 than in 2012, outpacing Republican growth by more than 2K votes. Flores, who Gonzales endorsed before the primary, faces Round Rock education nonprofit executive James Talarico, who had raised nearly $200K as of June 30. The district is a battleground for the competitive CD31 seat between longtime U.S. Rep. John Carter (R-Round Rock) and Round Rock nonprofit executive and former military pilot M.J. Hegar.

In HD138, Democrats cut a 7.5K-vote deficit in straight-party voting from 2012 into just a 2.5K-vote deficit in 2016. The number of straight-party Democratic voters increased 37% while the number of straight-party Republican voters fell 3%. As it is currently configured, HD138 has shifted from 13 points redder than the state in 2002 to 3 points bluer in 2016, with a significant amount of that jump occurring in the last couple of election cycles. Clinton won the district by 36 votes over Trump. Four years earlier, Mitt Romney carried the district by 20 points over President Obama. Bohac was unopposed in 2016, but now he faces Houston attorney Adam Milasincic, who raised $121K as of June 30, more than 60% the amount raised by Bohac.

Our final “lean Democratic” seat is HD144, which has changed partisan hands in every election cycle since it was drawn in 2012. Obama carried the district by 3 points in 2012, when Rep. Mary Ann Perez (D-Houston) was first elected, 52%-46%. Two years later, Greg Abbott defeated Wendy Davis by 5 points in the district, and Perez lost to Gilbert Peña by 152 votes. Turnout that year was 22%, one of the lowest in the state. Two years later, in rematch, Perez defeated Peña, 60%-40%, and Clinton carried the district by 19 points. Perez faces Ruben Villarreal, who has raised $25K as of June 30, well short of Perez’s $129K.

©2018 Texas Election Source LLC

🎙️We Have a Podcast! 🎙️

Bills and Business is your go-to podcast for conversations related to Texas legislation and business. Hosted by Laura Carr, Co-Founder of USLege—an AI-driven legislative tracking software—we bring you in-depth analysis on economic trends, impactful legislation, and key developments shaping Texas business.

Subscribe on Youtube and Spotify for weekly episodes!

🔍 USLege - The Only AI-First Political Tracking Solution ✨

USLege helps you track legislation and find what you need faster from bills, committee hearings, floor debates, and state agency meetings faster.

Say goodbye to tedious tasks!

You can follow USLege on LinkedIn, Facebook, and X.

🤝 Texas Association of Business 📈

Texas Association of Business (TAB) is the Texas State Chamber, representing companies of every size and industry. TAB’s purpose is to champion the best business climate in the world, unleashing the power of free enterprise to enhance lives for generations.

You can follow TAB on LinkedIn, Facebook, and X.

Table of Content
  1. 01 First
Trusted by Government Affairs Professionals and Corporate Policy Teams
Blog & Articles

Read more news

Texas Political Spotlight
This is some text inside of a div block.

Welcome back, friends

Texas is facing a pivotal legal test over its election system as Republicans seek to end open primaries, a move that supporters frame as protecting party autonomy and critics warn could create new barriers to voter participation. At the same time, federal officials are considering a land exchange that would allow SpaceX to expand its South Texas launch site, renewing debate over how to balance economic growth with the preservation of sensitive wildlife habitat along the Gulf Coast. Lastly, a federal judge has blocked a new Texas law regulating children’s access to app stores, underscoring the ongoing uncertainty over how far states can go in policing online safety without infringing on constitutional rights.

We hope you enjoyed today’s read!

Stay connected with TXLege News on X and LinkedIn!

#44 - Hope Osborn: Building Community for Women in Texas Politics with Pink Granite
This is some text inside of a div block.

Welcome to Episode #44 of Bills & Business. In this episode, Laura Carr, Co-Founder of USLege, sits down with Hope Osborn, Co-Founder of The Pink Granite Foundation.

Hope brings more than a decade of experience across the Texas Capitol, having worked in both chambers, both parties, and in the advocacy world. She shares the story behind The Pink Granite Foundation and how it has grown into a nonpartisan force for uplifting, connecting, and supporting women in Texas politics. From its grassroots beginnings to the impact of the 2025 Pink Granite Party, Hope provides an inside look at how the organization strengthens the political ecosystem.

Laura and Hope explore the nonprofit’s mentorship programs, year-round community-building efforts, and the unique pressures women face working under the dome. Hope offers insight into why women’s leadership in politics matters, how to break down persistent barriers, and what the future looks like for the next generation of female leaders in Texas policymaking.

Don’t forget to subscribe to Bills & Business on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and YouTube for more deep dives into Texas policy and business news.

📲 Follow Laura Carr

🐦 Twitter: @Laura_USLege https://x.com/Laura_USLege

💼 LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/laurauslege/

📸 Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/thereallauracarr/

🛍️ ShopMy: https://shopmy.us/shop/lauraluise?Section_title=latest-finds&tab=collections

✍️ Substack: https://lauraluise.substack.com/

🔗 Links: https://lauraluise.carrd.co/

📲 Follow USLege

✨ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/uslege.ai/

📘 Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/USLegeai

🐦 Twitter: @USLege_ai https://x.com/USLege_ai

💼 LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/uslege-ai/

🎧 Subscribe to Bills & Business

🌐 Website: https://www.uslege.ai/

▶️ YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@BillsandBusiness

🎵 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/22ZWg9VVb2AEGqyV14osNi?si=effe3795f8414171

🍎 Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/ph/podcast/bills-and-business-by-uslege/id1781059329

🎥 TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@uslege

📲 Follow Hope Osborn

💼 LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/hopeosborn/

🐦 Twitter: https://x.com/HopeOsbornTX

🎬 Produced by USLege

📞 Want to see USLege in action? Schedule a demo today! https://www.uslege.ai/demo

How to Choose the Right Legislative Bill Tracking Software for Your Organization
This is some text inside of a div block.

Legislative bill tracking software now sits at the center of how modern organizations monitor public policy.

With fast-moving legislation across states and at the federal level, even a single missed update can derail compliance, strategy, and stakeholder communication.

For government affairs, public affairs professionals, and policy professionals, the challenge is no longer finding information.

The real challenge is staying up to date, sorting through massive amounts of data, and acting fast enough to stay ahead of regulatory developments.

Organizations that still rely on manual tracking often miss hearing schedules, committee assignments, and vote movement during an active legislative session.

Those delays lead to rushed analysis, weak talking points, and reduced control over regulatory strategy.

This guide explains how modern legislative and regulatory tracking works, what features matter most, and how to evaluate legislative bill tracking software with confidence.

It also outlines how the right tools help organizations save time, stay informed, and work smarter with fewer resources.

What a Legislative Tracking Platform Actually Does

A legislative tracking platform collects bills, executive orders, and regulatory updates from Congress and state agencies.

It organizes full text, status, hearing schedules, and vote outcomes into a searchable structure.

Instead of searching dozens of sites, users access critical information in a single workspace.

This creates comprehensive coverage across jurisdictions and timeline stages.

Manual Monitoring vs Automated Systems

Manual tracking depends on email newsletters, website checks, spreadsheets, and delayed reports.

Automated tracking legislation systems rely on structured data feeds, continuous search processing, and AI-powered tagging.

This shift allows teams to track bills in real time while reducing reporting lag.

Who Relies on Legislative and Regulatory Tracking Every Day

Government Affairs Teams

Government affairs teams track legislation to advise internal leadership and shape outreach strategy.

They monitor committee hearings, regulatory changes, and voting calendars to anticipate outcomes.

Government Affairs Professionals

Government affairs professionals depend on real-time alerts to prepare briefings, manage stakeholder communication, and coordinate advocacy activity.

Public Affairs Professionals

Public affairs professionals use legislative tracking to stay informed on pending legislation that affects public positioning.

They use alerts, bill summaries, and reports to guide messaging and response timing.

Policy Professionals

Policy professionals analyze regulatory and legislative movement for forecasting and risk modeling.

Core Functions Every System Must Deliver

Real Time Alerts and Notifications

Real-time alerts ensure that no major event is missed.

Users receive status change alerts, hearing alerts, committee movement alerts, and vote alerts.

Many systems also deliver real-time legislative alerts and real-time notifications to multiple team members at once.

Email alerts remain a core communication channel.

Search and Filtering Tools

Strong search features allow users to search by keyword, bill number, sponsor, topic, and date.

Advanced filters allow professionals to track across Congress, agencies, and jurisdictions without manual sorting.

Bill Summaries and Full Text Access

Clear bill summaries help professionals review large volumes of legislation quickly.

Full text access supports detailed analysis when a deeper review is required.

Tracking Across the Full Legislative Process

The legislative process unfolds across many stages.

A strong tracking system follows every phase without delay.

Stages include introduction, committee hearing, committee vote, floor vote, reconciliation, and enactment.

Tracking each stage allows organizations to act with speed and precision.

Why Organizations Struggle Without Proper Tracking

Without reliable legislative tracking, organizations often miss key vote windows and fall behind on regulatory changes.

They lose early access to hearing schedules and waste time on manual legislative research.

Manual tracking also weakens stakeholder engagement and limits the ability to anticipate outcomes.

How AI-Powered Tracking Improves Speed and Accuracy

AI-powered systems classify bills by topic, industry, and risk level.

They reduce noise while increasing signal clarity.

Key AI-powered functions include automated tagging, predictive analysis, sentiment scoring, and impact forecasting.

This allows teams to anticipate policy shifts instead of reacting after passage.

Staying Ahead in Fast-Moving Legislative Environments

Fast-moving legislation often changes direction within days.

Organizations that stay ahead rely on continuous data intake and structured alerts.

To stay ahead consistently, teams must track daily activity, review bill movement, monitor committee assignments, and track hearing schedules.

Teams that do not stay ahead often miss early influence windows.

Jurisdictional Scope and Data Integrity

Federal Level Coverage

Federal-level tracking focuses on Congress, agencies, and executive orders.

These updates guide national strategy and compliance planning.

State and Local Monitoring

State and municipal legislation often moves faster than federal legislation.

Multi-jurisdiction tracking legislation tools allow organizations to track overlapping regulatory exposure while staying fully up to date.

The Role of Data in Modern Bill Monitoring

Data drives every element of tracking software.

It supports alerts, reports, dashboards, and compliance workflows.

Reliable data strengthens legislative analysis, regulatory monitoring, stakeholder analysis, and long-term strategy planning.

Reports, Analysis, and Action Planning

Strong report functions turn raw data into usable insights.

Reports guide leadership decisions at every level of the organization.

Common reports include daily legislative summaries, weekly regulatory reports, stakeholder briefings, and executive updates.

Advanced analysis allows teams to compare date ranges, sponsors, committees, and historical vote behavior.

Supporting Advocacy and Government Relations

Advocacy relies on early awareness and quick response.

Government relations teams depend on tracking to coordinate outreach tools, stakeholder engagement, and talking points.

Legislative tracking strengthens government relations by improving access to bill summaries, hearing schedules, and pending legislation updates.

Real Time Workflow Management

Real-time alerts flow into shared team workflows.

Every alert triggers review, analysis, and response.

Real-time notifications help assign internal owners, trigger review cycles, support rapid response, and prevent missed deadlines.

This structure allows the organization to maintain control under pressure.

Managing Regulatory Risk Through Continuous Monitoring

Regulatory risk increases when organizations track sporadically.

Continuous regulatory tracking reduces exposure by keeping leadership informed of regulatory changes.

Regulatory monitoring supports compliance alignment, internal controls, and audit readiness.

Integration With Internal Systems

Modern tracking software integrates with CRM systems, internal dashboards, compliance platforms, and reporting tools.

This improves access to legislative and regulatory data across the organization while reducing manual data entry.

Search, Review, and Control Functions

Search tools help teams locate relevant bills quickly.

Review workflows to ensure accuracy and relevance.

Control layers protect access across departments.

Key Evaluation Criteria for Selecting a Platform

Usability for Professionals

Professionals require intuitive dashboards, fast search, clear alerts, and low learning curves.

Usability directly impacts adoption and performance.

Customization for Each Organization

Every organization tracks different legislation.

Customization allows industry-specific focus, regional tracking, alert priorities, and tailored reports.

Cost, Spend, and Resource Allocation

Pricing affects total spend.

Automation reduces manual effort and helps teams save time while operating with less time investment.

Team Collaboration and Communication

Tracking systems support collaboration across the full team.

Shared alerts, shared reports, and shared review processes improve transparency and alignment.

Stakeholder Management and Client Communication

Stakeholders expect timely updates.

Clients rely on clear reports to guide compliance and planning.

Tracking platforms support stakeholder trust, client communication, and strategic confidence.

Avoiding Missed Opportunities and Compliance Failures

Organizations without structured tracking often miss hearings, deadlines, amendments, and engagement windows.

Every missed update increases both legal and operational risk.

Staying Informed in High-Volume Legislative Cycles

High-volume legislative sessions demand continuous monitoring.

To stay informed, teams rely on automated alerts, daily reports, and real-time legislative alerts.

Strategic Use of Legislative and Regulatory Tracking

Legislative and regulatory tracking supports long-term policy strategy, compliance planning, advocacy positioning, and organizational risk management.

Using Tracking to Anticipate Policy Shifts

Anticipation depends on trend analysis, sponsor behavior review, historical vote patterns, and committee movement tracking.

These insights help organizations remain one step ahead.

Managing High Bill Volume With Limited Resources

Congress and state legislatures introduce thousands of bills each year.

Tracking software allows organizations to manage this volume with fewer resources and stronger control.

Accuracy, Speed, and Critical Information Flow

Accuracy ensures trust in decisions.

Speed ensures timely action.

Critical information must flow without interruption to all stakeholders.

Supporting Long-Term Strategy With Continuous Data

Continuous data monitoring aligns regulatory planning with business strategy.

It prevents reactive behavior and supports proactive positioning.

Future Direction of Legislative and Regulatory Monitoring

The future is driven by deeper AI-powered analytics, faster real-time alerts, broader data interoperability, and stronger predictive analysis.

These advances will further improve organizational readiness.

Texas Political Spotlight
This is some text inside of a div block.

Welcome back, friends

Texas is facing a pivotal legal test over its election system as Republicans seek to end open primaries, a move that supporters frame as protecting party autonomy and critics warn could create new barriers to voter participation. At the same time, federal officials are considering a land exchange that would allow SpaceX to expand its South Texas launch site, renewing debate over how to balance economic growth with the preservation of sensitive wildlife habitat along the Gulf Coast. Lastly, a federal judge has blocked a new Texas law regulating children’s access to app stores, underscoring the ongoing uncertainty over how far states can go in policing online safety without infringing on constitutional rights.

We hope you enjoyed today’s read!

Stay connected with TXLege News on X and LinkedIn!

Texas Political Spotlight
This is some text inside of a div block.

Welcome back, friends

Michael and Susan Dell’s unprecedented $6.25 billion pledge to expand federal “Trump Accounts” aims to boost long-term savings for 25 million American children. In Lubbock, Texas Tech’s new classroom restrictions on race, gender identity, and sexuality have ignited an immediate clash over academic freedom and curriculum control. And in Northeast Texas, Rep. Gary VanDeaver’s decision not to seek reelection opens a pivotal Republican primary.

We hope you enjoyed today’s read!

Stay connected with TXLege News on X and LinkedIn!

Texas Political Spotlight
This is some text inside of a div block.

Welcome back, friends

Texas voters approved one of the largest property tax relief packages in state history on Tuesday, raising the homestead exemption to $140,000 and granting new tax breaks for seniors, people with disabilities, and small businesses. In Austin, residents rejected Proposition Q, a plan to fund public safety, homelessness programs, and city facility initiatives through a property tax hike, forcing city leaders to rework the budget and brace for service cuts. Meanwhile, Bexar County voters narrowly passed Propositions A and B, greenlighting up to $311 million in tourism-funded support for a new downtown Spurs arena and upgrades to the Freeman Coliseum grounds.

We hope you enjoyed today’s read!

Stay connected with TXLege News on X and LinkedIn!