The Reddening of the Hispanic Vote
by Jeff Blaylock
Boyz II Men had the No. 1 song, and Tim Allen’s The Santa Clause was No. 1 at the box office. As AOL was cheerfully announced we had mail, Zip Disks began freeing us from the tyranny of floppies. The Dallas Cowboys were Super Bowl champions.
That was the most recent time Texas voters elected Democrats to statewide offices. Since then, the last 167 candidates elected statewide in Texas have been Republicans, including the eight who won on Tuesday. The voters of every other state have elected at least one Democrat statewide since Texas last did it, including states much redder than Texas is today.
Thirty years of losing … and counting. There have been a few “almosts” like John Sharp and Paul Hobby in 1998, the Barack Obama wave of 2008 and Beto O’Rourke six years ago. There was no “almost” about this year’s election. Tuesday’s results reinforced not only the gap between the two parties but also the rapid erosion of the Democratic brand among Hispanic and Latino voters.
Exit polling indicates Hispanic/Latino voters favored former President Trump over Vice President Harris, 55%-44%, but that was not the most surprising data point. More revelatory is realizing Hispanic/Latino men (64%-35%, +29%) voted for Trump at a rate much closer to White men (68%-29%, +39%) than Hispanic/Latino women (43%-55%, minus-12%). Trump’s campaign was especially aimed at men, and it appears that strategy has worked and continues to work.
But we don’t need exit polling to reveal the increasing success of Republican candidates among Hispanic/Latino voters. We just need to look at the map.
The reddening of South and West Texas accelerated since Trump’s first election in 2016. Trump improved his performance in every one of these counties, many of them by more than 10 points – 14 of them by more than 20 points. His 52.5% in Cameron Co. is 20.5 percentage points higher than his 32.0% in 2016. In Hidalgo Co., Trump received 51.0% percent of the vote, up 23.0 points from 2016. In Webb Co., Trump won with 50.7% of the vote, up 28.1 points from his first run for president.
His vote share rose 39% in Starr Co., 38% in Maverick Co., 28% in Zapata, 25% in Jim Hogg Co., 22% in Zavala Co., 21% in Brooks and Willacy counties and almost 20% in Val Verde Co. Overall, he improved his performance among the dozen border counties by 20.9 percentage points over 2016, carrying all but two of them. In 2016, he won five of them.
Whatever advantage Democrats had historically relied upon in South Texas is largely gone. Clinton’s nearly 240,000 net vote advantage from border counties in 2016 has shrunk to just over 11,000 votes. Among all the counties shown on the map, a net margin of over 300,000 votes for Democrats has shrunk to fewer than 20,000 votes.
We have not explored precinct-level data yet, but I suspect Trump gained support among Hispanics and Latinos in the urban and counties that have lately been Democratic strongholds. In 2020, President Biden received more than 923,000 net votes in Dallas, Harris, Travis and Bexar counties combined. Trump cut that margin to around 567,000 net votes this year, a shift of more than 350,000 votes.
Put together, these are staggering losses of net votes coming from the only areas Democrats have performed well in recent elections. The rest of the state is a rural red wall.
Trump’s margin in counties with fewer than 20,000 registered voters almost completely offset Harris’s advantage in counties with at least 500,000 registered voters. The counties in between are solidly red. Harris won exactly one county with between 20,000 and 500,000 registered voters: Hays.
Trump received at least 80% of the vote in 129 of the state’s 254 counties. Harris had single-digit support in two dozen counties. Trump’s worst performance was 29.4% in Travis Co. Harris cleared that figure in just over 50 counties. Trump’s advantage in counties with fewer than 50,000 registered voters exceeded 900,000 net votes. Add the counties with between 50,000 and 100,000 registered voters, and the Republican’s advantage rose to 1.3 million votes. As of this writing, that’s more than the total number of votes cast for any candidate in at least 20 different states.
We have focused this analysis on the presidential race. Keep in mind that Trump slightly under-performed other Republican statewide candidates, as he has in every election. The statewide judicial candidates averaged 58%, a little over a point and a half above Trump.
There are only three methods to increase a political party’s share of the vote: convert existing voters from the other party, win crossover votes for specific candidates and attract new voters. Republicans have the edge in the first method as evidenced by the map above. Crossover voting has become increasingly rare, at least at the statewide level. Roughly 1 out of every 55 voters selected Allred and otherwise mostly if not entirely Republican candidates. This is not surprising. It’s been six years since single-punch, straight-party voting was an option, but its popularity had grown until it was being used by seven out of every 10 voters.
That leaves new voters, a group that historically votes at much lower rates than recent voters. New voters fall into four basic buckets: Texans who haven’t registered to vote, Texans who are registered but haven’t voted, new Texans who recently moved into the state and young adult Texans turning 18.
Starting with the last group, voters under age 24 favored Trump, 54%-43%, according to exit polling. At least for now, that option is not particularly great for Democrats.
The potential impact of the other three groups is harder to tease out, largely because many more of them don’t vote than do. Those that have voted left behind some breadcrumbs. According to the exit poll, the 9% of voters who answered yes to “Is this the first year you have ever voted?” went to Trump, 80%-19%. According to Derek Ryan’s analysis of primary voting, around 30,000 voters with “no voting history” cast ballots early in this year’s Republican primary compared to around 18,000 in the Democratic primary. So new voters seem to be more in the Republican column, on balance, at least for now.
That leaves non-voters, and there are a lot of them. More than 7 million registered voters did not cast a ballot in this year’s presidential election. Another 1.5 million or so Texans who are eligible to vote were not registered in time to vote in last week’s election.
Sadly, neither of these figures is new or unusual. At least 5 million registered voters did not vote in each even-year general election since 1998. At least 1.5 million eligible Texans were not registered to vote in each even-year general election since 2010 (In other words, since the Obama blue wave of 2008).
Getting non-voters to the polls has historically been quite a challenge. Frequent voters tend to vote. Non-voters tend not to vote. #analysis
Going into the 2020 election, there were almost 5 million Texans who had voted in at least one of the last four general election but no primary elections, according to Derek Ryan. More than 2 million of them didn’t vote in 2020. There were even more registered voters with no recent voting history whatsoever (This would include newly registered voters.). More than 4 million of them didn’t vote in 2020.
Coming into 2024, these two groups of sporadic voters and non-voting registrants accounted for more around two thirds of Texans registered to vote in last week’s election. We do not have final figures on their participation, but it is unlikely to be very different from most past years. In other words, much lower than frequent voters.
If, on balance, new voters are trending Republican, converted voters are turning Republican, non-voters are hard to motivate, and everyone else was already favoring Republicans, then there is very little fertile ground left aside from unregistered but eligible Texans, a group that is surely unlikely to vote in huge enough numbers even if they were registered.
That’s not to say it is impossible. In 2026, Democratic candidates will be running against the Trump White House rather than away from Biden. For Democratic candidates, 2018 was undoubtedly a better year than 2016. It wasn’t enough, but it was better. No one truly knows what the economy will be like in two years or how world events may shape voters’ opinions. No one can predict if voters might sour on Republicans’ more conservative agenda sure to be enacted this session. Inspirational candidates may arise.
The road, already long traveled, remains long and difficult. With a broken brand and a lack of avenues to win over voters, Democrats are poised to continue their statewide losing streak.
Jeff Blaylock is the founder of TXElects Legacy & Senior Editor of TXLege News. You can follow Jeff on X and LinkedIn.
We hope you enjoyed today’s read!
🎙️We Have a Podcast! 🎙️
Bills and Business is your go-to podcast for conversations related to Texas legislation and business. Hosted by Laura Carr, Co-Founder of USLege—an AI-driven legislative tracking software—we bring you in-depth analysis on economic trends, impactful legislation, and key developments shaping Texas business.
Subscribe on Youtube and Spotify for weekly episodes!
- 01 First
Subscribe to our Newsletter
Read more news
How to Choose the Right Legislative Tracking Software for Your Organization
Across industries, teams must track bills, monitor legislation, and analyze regulatory changes that can impact operations.
Every year, hundreds of thousands of bills are introduced across jurisdictions, creating a large volume of data that must be monitored closely.
Manual legislative tracking often leads to missed alerts, outdated reports, and limited access to relevant legislation. This creates risk for organizations that rely on timely information to make informed decisions.
Modern tracking software solves this problem by providing real-time alerts, structured reports, and ai powered insights that help teams stay ahead of changes.
These tools support government affairs, advocacy efforts, and compliance teams in managing priorities.
This guide explains how legislative tracking works, what essential features to look for, and how to choose the right platform for your organization.
What Is Legislative Tracking Software?
Legislative tracking software is a system that helps organizations track bills, monitor legislation, and analyze regulatory updates across multiple jurisdictions.
It gathers data from government sources, including Congress, committee assignments, and hearings, and delivers real-time alerts to users through advanced legislative tracking software.
Core Functionality of Legislative Tracking
Legislative tracking tools collect and organize data from legislative databases to provide relevant results.
They help users:
- Track bills introduced at the federal and state levels
- Monitor committee hearings and legislative processes
- Receive email alerts and notifications
- Access reports and analysis
Bill tracking becomes easier when data is centralized in one platform.
Understanding the Legislative Process
The legislative process includes multiple steps, such as bills introduced, committee assignments, hearings, and final decisions.
Tracking tools simplify understanding by organizing data and highlighting key changes.
Policy professionals rely on these tools to monitor legislation and support advocacy efforts.
Why Organizations Need Legislative Tracking Software
Organizations operate in complex regulatory environments where laws change frequently.
Challenges Without Tracking Tools
Without automated tracking tools, teams face:
- Difficulty tracking bills across jurisdictions
- Missed alerts about legislation
- Limited access to accurate data
- Inefficient search processes
Manual tracking reduces efficiency and increases risk.
Benefits of Legislative Tracking Software
Using tracking software provides several benefits:
- Real-time alerts for new legislation
- Centralized data and reports
- Improved understanding of regulatory changes
- Faster decision-making
These tools help organizations stay ahead in a fast-moving legislative environment.
Risk Management and Compliance
Compliance requires continuous monitoring of regulations.
Tracking tools help organizations:
- Monitor regulatory changes
- Maintain updated processes
- Reduce compliance risks
Automated tracking improves accuracy and efficiency.
Key Features to Look for in Legislative Tracking Software
Selecting the right tracking software requires understanding its essential features.
Real Time Alerts and Notifications
Real-time alerts keep teams informed.
Look for tools that provide:
- Email alerts for new bills
- Notifications for committee hearings
- Alerts for executive orders
Alerts ensure users receive updates as they happen.
Comprehensive Coverage Across Jurisdictions
A strong system should offer comprehensive coverage.
This includes:
- Federal legislation
- State and local bills
- Regulatory updates
Coverage across jurisdictions ensures no important information is missed.
Advanced Search and Filtering
Search functionality is essential for finding relevant data.
Key features include:
- Keyword search
- Filters by date and jurisdiction
- Advanced search options
Efficient search tools help users find relevant results quickly.
Analytics and Reporting
Reports and analyses provide insights into legislative activity.
Look for:
- Data analysis tools
- Reports for leadership
- Insights for decision-making
Reports support informed decisions.
AI-Powered Insights and Analysis
AI-powered technology improves tracking.
Features include:
- AI-powered insights for trends
- AI-powered analysis of data
- Automated summaries
AI-powered tools help users focus on relevant data.
Integration and Collaboration
Integration supports team collaboration.
Look for tools that:
- Allow multiple users
- Support team collaboration
- Enable users to share updates
Collaboration improves workflow and communication.
Types of Legislative Tracking Solutions
Organizations can choose from different types of tracking tools.
Basic Monitoring Tools
Basic tools offer simple features.
They provide:
- Email alerts
- Limited reports
- Basic search
These tools are suitable for smaller teams.
Advanced Policy Intelligence Platforms
Advanced platforms offer deeper insights.
They include:
- AI-powered insights
- Advanced analysis
- Enhanced search tools
These tools support more complex needs.
Enterprise Tracking Software
Enterprise solutions provide full functionality.
They include:
- Multi-user access
- Advanced reports
- Full integration
These platforms support large organizations and government relations teams.
How to Evaluate Legislative Tracking Software
Choosing the right platform requires careful evaluation.
Define Organizational Needs
Start by identifying your organization’s needs.
Consider:
- Industry requirements
- Jurisdictions to monitor
- Team size
This helps narrow down options.
Assess Data Accuracy
Accurate data is critical.
Evaluate:
- Data sources
- Update frequency
- Accuracy of reports
Reliable data improves understanding.
Customization Options
Customization allows teams to focus on priorities.
Look for:
- Custom alerts
- Ability to assign tasks
- Flexible dashboards
Customization improves efficiency.
Security and Access
Security is important.
Check for:
- Access controls
- Data protection
- Secure platforms
This ensures safe data management.
Support and Training
Support helps teams use tools effectively.
Consider:
- Training resources
- Customer support
- Onboarding assistance
Strong support improves adoption.
Cost Considerations and ROI
Cost plays a key role in decision-making.
Pricing Models
Common pricing models include:
- Subscription plans
- Tiered pricing
- Enterprise packages
Hidden Costs
Consider additional costs such as:
- Implementation fees
- Training expenses
- Integration costs
Measuring ROI
ROI comes from efficiency and risk reduction.
Key metrics include:
- Time saved on tracking bills
- Reduced compliance risks
- Improved productivity
Tracking software helps organizations save time and improve performance.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
Avoid these mistakes:
- Choosing based only on price
- Ignoring scalability
- Overlooking integration
- Not involving stakeholders
- Skipping usability testing
Careful evaluation helps avoid issues.
Future Trends in Legislative Tracking Technology
Technology continues to evolve.
AI-Powered Technology
AI-powered tools provide better insights.
They can:
- Predict trends
- Analyze data
- Deliver relevant results
Automation and Workflow Integration
Automation improves processes.
Future tools will:
- Automate alerts
- Assign tasks
- Improve collaboration
Global Regulatory Tracking
Organizations need global coverage.
Future tools will offer:
- Cross-border tracking
- Unified dashboards
- Enhanced reporting
Texas Political Spotlight
Welcome back friends,
Early voting in Texas has surged past recent midterm and presidential benchmarks, with Democratic ballots currently outpacing Republican participation and fueling new debate over enthusiasm, turnout dynamics and what the numbers could signal for November. At the same time, the State Board of Education has approved more than 4,000 revisions to the state-developed Bluebonnet curriculum, reigniting scrutiny over oversight, taxpayer costs and how religion and American history are presented in public schools. Meanwhile, Gov. Greg Abbott praised President Trump’s 2026 State of the Union address and highlighted Texas’ alignment on border security, school choice and economic policy, underscoring the continued political partnership as Trump prepares to visit the state ahead of the primaries.
We hope you enjoyed today’s read!
How AI Is Reshaping Legislative Tracking Software and Policy Analysis
Missing even one update can impact compliance, strategy, and government relations.
Many teams still rely on manual research or scattered tools, which slows down analysis and increases the risk of errors.
Without reliable alerts and centralized data, it becomes difficult to stay informed and respond to fast-moving policy changes.
Artificial intelligence is changing how the legislative process is managed.
Modern systems now deliver real-time alerts, automate tracking, and provide ai powered insights that help teams stay ahead.
These solutions allow organizations to work smarter and improve their understanding of complex legislation.
In this guide, you will learn how AI improves legislative tracking, strengthens analysis, and supports better decisions.
What Is Legislative Tracking Software?
Understanding Legislative Tracking
Legislative tracking refers to the process of monitoring bills, regulations, and policy developments across multiple jurisdictions.
It helps organizations stay informed and respond to changes that matter.
Many organizations rely on advanced solutions like legislative tracking software to simplify tracking and maintain control of policy updates.
At its core, tracking systems collect data, improve organization, and deliver relevant results through dashboards and report outputs.
These tools support compliance, advocacy, and strategic planning.
Core Functions of Legislative Tracking Tools
Modern tools provide key capabilities that support efficient tracking.
- Bill tracking to monitor bills and updates.
- Monitoring committee hearings, hearings, and committee assignments.
- Tracking vote results and legislative date updates.
- Following executive orders and regulations.
- Creating advanced reporting for analysis and reporting needs.
These tools help users track bills, improve search, and maintain the organization of legislative data.
Importance of Bill Tracking
Thousands of bills are introduced each year across jurisdictions and at the federal level.
Without proper bill tracking, organizations can miss critical developments.
- Bill tracking helps identify relevant measures.
- It improves the analysis of legislation.
- It ensures teams never miss updates.
This strengthens understanding of the legislative process.
Limitations of Traditional Systems
Traditional tracking methods often rely on manual effort.
- Delayed alerts can cause teams to miss updates.
- Limited real-time visibility reduces effectiveness.
- Poor organization of data slows analysis.
These issues make it difficult to stay ahead of regulatory changes and advocacy needs.
The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Policy Analysis
How AI Processes Legislative Data
AI helps process large amounts of legislative data quickly.
- Natural language processing improves the understanding of legislation.
- Machine learning analyzes patterns in bills and regulations.
- Automation reduces manual tracking tasks.
This allows teams to save time and improve efficiency.
AI-Powered Insights for Better Analysis
AI provides ai powered insights that enhance analysis.
These insights help identify relevant measures and track policy changes across jurisdictions.
Organizations can anticipate trends and stay ahead of developments.
Real Time Alerts and Automation
AI-powered tools provide real-time alerts that notify users instantly.
- Alerts for new bills and updates.
- Notifications for committee hearings and vote changes.
- Updates on regulatory developments.
These alerts ensure teams never miss important information.
Key Benefits of AI-Powered Legislative Tracking
Real Time Monitoring and Alerts
AI enables continuous tracking across jurisdictions.
- Receive real-time alerts on bills and regulations.
- Stay informed about policy developments.
- Never miss important updates.
This ensures full visibility into legislative changes.
Predictive Insights for Decision-Making
AI uses data to generate ai powered insights.
- Forecast outcomes of bills.
- Identify policy changes early.
- Support informed decisions.
This helps organizations stay ahead of risks.
Improved Efficiency and Organization
Automation improves organization and workflow.
- Reduce manual tracking.
- Improve data accuracy.
- Generate report outputs faster.
Teams can work smarter and focus on strategy.
Enhanced Team Collaboration
Modern platforms improve team collaboration.
- Assign tasks to team members.
- Share updates with stakeholders and clients.
- Improve communication across teams.
This supports better coordination and execution.
Comprehensive Coverage Across Jurisdictions
AI tools provide comprehensive coverage of legislation.
- Track bills at the federal level and across jurisdictions.
- Monitor committees, hearings, and measures.
- Access centralized data.
This provides greater control over tracking activities.
How AI Enables Predictive Insights
Trend Identification
AI analyzes data to identify patterns in legislation.
- Track recurring measures.
- Monitor policy changes.
- Identify regulatory trends.
This improves understanding and helps teams anticipate future developments.
Outcome Prediction
AI models analyze data to predict outcomes.
- Estimate vote results.
- Analyze legislators and stakeholder positions.
- Evaluate opposition.
This strengthens decision-making and strategy.
Stakeholder Analysis
AI helps identify key stakeholders and relationships.
- Map connections between legislators and committees.
- Identify decision-makers.
- Support advocacy strategies.
This improves government relations efforts.
Use Cases of AI in Legislative Tracking
Government Agencies
Government agencies use tracking to monitor legislation and regulations.
- Track policy developments.
- Improve public services.
- Support compliance.
Legal Professionals
Legal teams rely on bill tracking and regulatory tracking.
- Analyze laws.
- Track changes in legislation.
- Support legal strategies.
Corporate Compliance Teams
Businesses use regulatory tracking to manage risk.
- Monitor regulations.
- Track policy changes.
- Stay ahead of compliance needs.
Advocacy Organizations
Advocacy groups rely on legislative tracking for advocacy efforts.
- Track bills and hearings.
- Engage stakeholders.
- Influence outcomes.
Challenges and Limitations
Data Quality Issues
Legislative data can be inconsistent across jurisdictions.
- Different formats for bills.
- Missing information.
- Inconsistent terminology.
This affects analysis accuracy.
Interpretation Limitations
AI improves understanding but cannot replace human judgment.
- Complex legal language requires review.
- Context matters in legislation.
Human expertise remains important.
Ethical and Privacy Concerns
AI systems must be used responsibly.
- Data bias risks.
- Transparency requirements.
- Privacy concerns.
Organizations must ensure ethical use.
Future Trends in Legislative Intelligence
Advanced Predictive Analytics
AI will continue to improve analysis capabilities.
- Real time forecasting of bills.
- Better risk assessment.
- Improved insights.
Integration with Big Data
Combining data sources improves understanding.
- Economic data.
- Social trends.
- Industry insights.
This enhances analysis and decision-making.
AI Powered Decision Support
Future platforms will provide automated insights.
- Recommendations based on data.
- Improved decision support.
This helps organizations stay ahead.
Global Legislative Monitoring
AI enables tracking across jurisdictions globally.
- Monitor international legislation.
- Track global regulations.
This supports global compliance strategies.
How to Choose the Right Legislative Tracking Platform
Key Features to Look For
- Real time alerts and email alerts.
- AI powered analysis and insights.
- Advanced reporting and dashboards.
Scalability and Integration
- Flexible access to data.
- Integration with existing systems.
- Ability to handle large data volumes.
User Experience and Collaboration
- Easy search functions.
- Clear report outputs.
- Ability to share updates with stakeholders and colleagues.
Texas Political Spotlight
Welcome back friends,
Early voting in Texas has surged past recent midterm and presidential benchmarks, with Democratic ballots currently outpacing Republican participation and fueling new debate over enthusiasm, turnout dynamics and what the numbers could signal for November. At the same time, the State Board of Education has approved more than 4,000 revisions to the state-developed Bluebonnet curriculum, reigniting scrutiny over oversight, taxpayer costs and how religion and American history are presented in public schools. Meanwhile, Gov. Greg Abbott praised President Trump’s 2026 State of the Union address and highlighted Texas’ alignment on border security, school choice and economic policy, underscoring the continued political partnership as Trump prepares to visit the state ahead of the primaries.
We hope you enjoyed today’s read!
Texas Political Spotlight
Welcome back friends
Sen. John Cornyn is closing his Republican Senate primary campaign by warning that a Ken Paxton nomination could jeopardize GOP success across Texas in November, while Paxton allies argue he is best positioned to energize conservative turnout in a race highlighting competing strategies for maintaining Republican dominance statewide. In the Republican contest for Texas attorney general, the four leading candidates largely agreed on core conservative policies but used a recent forum to intensify clashes over experience, political loyalty, and campaign credibility. Meanwhile, Texas is emerging as a national testing ground for small modular nuclear reactors, with state leaders and private companies betting the technology can meet surging electricity demand.
We hope you enjoyed today’s read!
Texas Political Spotlight
Welcome back, friends
A crowded Republican primary to replace U.S. Rep. Chip Roy is taking shape as former MLB star Mark Teixeira pours millions into his campaign and secures endorsements from President Trump and Gov. Abbott, positioning himself as the early frontrunner in a race that will likely decide the next representative for the solidly red district. At the same time, federal regulators have launched an inquiry into ABC’s The View after it interviewed Texas Senate candidate James Talarico. Meanwhile, Attorney General Ken Paxton is suing a Bastrop rendering plant over emissions described by residents as overwhelming and harmful, escalating a high-profile environmental dispute that has drawn hundreds of complaints and could result in significant penalties for the company.
We hope you enjoyed today’s read!
