Commentary
01/06/2021

Commentary: A Shameful Day, But the Republic Endures

TXElects

Note to my subscribers and readers: It is difficult to remain impartial and unemotional on a day like this, when the very fabric of our Republic is ripped and torn by domestic terrorists who believe President Trump’s increasingly fantastical claims that the election was stolen from him and were incited to act by Trump himself. At least four people have died, according to the District’s police. The Constitution prevailed, but not unanimously.

A day that began with questions as to how Vice President Mike Pence would act with respect to his responsibilities under the Twelfth Amendment ended with questions as to how Pence would act with respect to the Twenty-fifth Amendment. The Twelfth Amendment defines his role in counting electoral votes. The Twenty-fifth Amendment defines his role in removing the president from office. On a shameful day that an angry mob temporarily overran the U.S. Capitol, the Constitution and our Republic prevailed.

“These are the things and events that happen when a sacred landslide election victory is so unceremoniously & viciously stripped away from great patriots,” President Trump said in a tweet, which was later removed by Twitter, hours after a throng of his supporters invaded the U.S. Capitol. “Go home with love & in peace. Remember this day forever!”

Tweet from President Trump

He was, of course, talking to the mob who temporarily occupied the U.S. Capitol, interrupting the normally ceremonial joint session of Congress to count electoral votes.

Three states into the certification process and as expected, U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz (R) was the upper chamber’s signatory to the first objection to electoral votes, joining U.S. Rep. Paul Gosar (R-Ariz.). The joint session of Congress recessed so that each chamber could debate the merits of the objection.

On the Senate floor, Cruz said he was not arguing for setting aside the results of the election but instead advocating for the formation of an “electoral commission” based on the model of the election of 1876 “to conduct a 10-day emergency audit.” The audit is needed, he argued, to assuage the “39% of Americans” who believe the election was rigged. The narrative of a rigged, stolen election has been largely driven by President Trump and his allies, and it is unlikely the findings of any government tribunal would settle the matter with those voters so long as the lie lives.

Within moments of his objection being filed, Cruz’s campaign sent a fundraising plea asking for “emergency support right now … a generous contribution now to show that you have my back in this fight” (Emphasis mine.). As those fundraising appeals continued to land in inboxes and on cell phones through the afternoon, a mob spurred by the President forced the Capitol into lockdown.

Earlier in the day, Atty. Gen. Ken Paxton (R) addressed the gathering of Trump supporters at the “Save America Rally” on the White House Ellipse. “One of the great things about the state of Texas is that we did not quit,” Paxton said, referring to his lawsuit seeking to overturn other states’ election results. “If you look at what Georgia did, they capitulated, they consented.” Hours after his speech, he retweeted a conspiracy theory about a “’bus load’ of Antifa thugs” infiltrating Trump’s supporters to conduct “false Trump flag ops.”

At the rally, Trump said he would never concede and never give up the fight. He added that he expected Pence would “do the right thing” while presiding over the joint session. “If Mike Pence does the right thing, we win the election,” Trump said. And if Pence does not win the election for Trump? “I’m going to be very disappointed in you,” he said, as if speaking to Pence directly.

The Vice President released a statement moments before the joint session began, making clear he would fulfill his constitutional duty and not claim authority to reject electoral votes. Trump was indeed disappointed.

“Mike Pence didn’t have the courage to do what should have been done to protect our Country and our Constitution, giving States a chance to certify a corrected set of facts, not the fraudulent or inaccurate ones which they were asked to previously certify,” Trump tweeted shortly before the Capitol was stormed. “USA demands the truth!”

An attempted coup ensued. Inspired by the president, a throng of domestic terrorists attacked the seat of the Legislative Branch of government. It was disgraceful, disgusting, dangerous and completely avoidable.

Hours later, after order was restored and the chambers restarted their separate deliberations, Gosar – the Arizona Republican objecting to his own state’s presidential election but curiously not his own election to Congress – tweeted that he would proceed “on behalf of Arizona” with his objection. “Leftist violence – or any violence – will not deter our mission for truth and transparency.” Quite the pivot, there, transforming a pro-Trump mob into a leftist group, just like Paxton had insinuated earlier. This notion had already spread quickly across social media.

In the Senate, Cruz was joined by just five colleagues, two of whom have been U.S. Senators for three days, in the vote to sustain his objection to Arizona’s electors.

In the House, Rep. Chip Roy (R-Austin) remained one of the Republicans’ most vocal opponents of objecting to the certification. “I will not be voting to reject the electors,” he told his colleagues. “If this is my political death warrant, so be it” he said. Roy, who was once Cruz’s chief of staff, added, “I swore an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States, and I will not bend its words into contortions for political expediency and then claim I am honoring that oath.”

Others took a different path. Rep. Lance Gooden (R-Terrell) remained convinced that objecting was necessary. “Mob riots don’t suddenly make this election secure,” he tweeted. Earlier in the day, he tweeted that he will “CONTINUE to fight for our great President.”

Gooden was not alone in voting to sustain Cruz and Gosar’s objection. A total of 121 House Republicans – a majority of the caucus – voted to sustain Cruz and Gosar’s objection to the Arizona electors. Within the Texas delegation, he was joined by U.S. Reps. Jodey Arrington (R-Lubbock), Brian Babin (R-Woodville), Michael Burgess (R-Lewisville), John Carter (R-Round Rock), Michael Cloud (R-Victoria), Pat Fallon (R-Prosper), Louie Gohmert (R-Tyler), Ronny Jackson (R-Amarillo), Troy Nehls (R-Richmond), August Pfluger (R-San Angelo), Pete Sessions (R-Waco), Randy Weber (R-Friendswood), Roger Williams (R-Austin) and Ron Wright (R-Arlington).

Early this morning, after riding a Metro train with a group of Trump supporters, Gooden tweeted he “will be the voice of MILLIONS of Texans who have been disenfranchised by this RIGGED & STOLEN election.”

A fire burns as long as it is given oxygen.

– Jeff Blaylock, Publisher of Texas Election Source

©2021 Texas Election Source

🎙️We Have a Podcast! 🎙️

Bills and Business is your go-to podcast for conversations related to Texas legislation and business. Hosted by Laura Carr, Co-Founder of USLege—an AI-driven legislative tracking software—we bring you in-depth analysis on economic trends, impactful legislation, and key developments shaping Texas business.

Subscribe on Youtube and Spotify for weekly episodes!

🔍 USLege - The Only AI-First Political Tracking Solution ✨

USLege helps you track legislation and find what you need faster from bills, committee hearings, floor debates, and state agency meetings faster.

Say goodbye to tedious tasks!

You can follow USLege on LinkedIn, Facebook, and X.

🤝 Texas Association of Business 📈

Texas Association of Business (TAB) is the Texas State Chamber, representing companies of every size and industry. TAB’s purpose is to champion the best business climate in the world, unleashing the power of free enterprise to enhance lives for generations.

You can follow TAB on LinkedIn, Facebook, and X.

Table of Content
  1. 01 First
Trusted by Government Affairs Professionals and Corporate Policy Teams
Blog & Articles

Read more news

How to Choose the Best Federal Legislative Tracking Software for Your Organization
This is some text inside of a div block.

Every year, thousands of bills move through Congress, and without the right tracking system, teams miss critical information that affects compliance, strategy, and advocacy.

Manual tracking creates gaps.

Teams rely on scattered data, delayed alerts, and inconsistent updates, which makes it harder to stay ahead of policy developments.

Modern legislative tracking tools solve this by centralizing legislative and regulatory data, automating bill tracking, and delivering real-time alerts.

They allow organizations to monitor federal legislation, understand the legislative process, and act quickly when changes occur.

In this guide, you’ll learn how to evaluate legislative monitoring platforms, what features matter most, and how policy management solutions help government affairs teams work smarter.

You will also see how to compare tools, avoid mistakes, and choose a system that fits your organization.

After reviewing your current workflow, you can explore a centralized system like federal legislative tracking software

to improve how your team tracks legislation and responds to policy changes.

What Is Federal Legislative Tracking Software?

Federal legislative tracking software is a system that helps organizations track bills, monitor committee hearings, and follow the full legislative process in one place.

It replaces manual spreadsheets with automated tracking, giving users access to accurate and updated data.

Core Functionality Explained

A strong legislative tracking tool provides:

  • Bill tracking across Congress and committees.
  • Real-time alerts when bills move or change.
  • Search tools to filter legislation by keywords or policy areas.
  • Centralized legislative and regulatory data.

Instead of checking multiple sources, users can track bills with just a few clicks.

These systems also:

  • Automate legislative tracking across every legislative session.
  • Provide bill summaries to quickly understand relevance.
  • Deliver alerts when committee hearings or votes are scheduled.
  • Help users stay informed about pending legislation and regulatory changes.

Congress introduces thousands of bills each year.

Without automation, tracking becomes inefficient and error-prone.

Why Organizations Need Legislative Monitoring Platforms

Organizations face constant pressure to monitor federal legislation and regulatory developments.

Missing a policy update can impact compliance, operations, and long-term planning.

Key Use Cases Across Industries

Legislative monitoring platforms support different teams across an organization:

  • Government affairs teams track policy developments and engage with legislators.
  • Public affairs professionals monitor regulatory tracking and advocacy efforts.
  • Legal teams follow regulations and compliance requirements.
  • Corporations track bills that impact stakeholders and clients.

These tools help organizations:

  • Stay ahead of policy changes and regulatory developments.
  • Improve response time with real-time alerts.
  • Support advocacy and government relations strategies.
  • Provide actionable insights for informed decisions.

For example, a public policy manager can monitor policy areas and receive alerts when bills move through committee assignments.

This allows the team to act quickly and ensure their voice is heard during advocacy efforts.

Essential Features to Look For in Policy Management Solutions

Choosing the right legislative tracking tool depends on features that align with your organization and workflow tools.

Real-Time Alerts and Notifications

Real-time alerts are critical for staying informed.

Look for:

  • Alerts for bill movements, amendments, and executive orders.
  • Email alerts and dashboard notifications.
  • Alerts tailored to specific policy areas.

These alerts ensure your team never misses the latest developments.

Advanced Search and Filtering

Search functionality determines how quickly you find relevant results.

Key features include:

  • Keyword-based search across legislative and regulatory data.
  • Filters by committee, sponsor, and legislative session.
  • Ability to track bills across multiple policy areas.

Strong search tools help teams quickly understand what matters.

Data Visualization and Reporting

Advanced reporting turns raw data into useful analysis.

Look for:

  • Legislative dashboards that show trends.
  • Custom reports for stakeholders and clients.
  • Advanced reporting features for deeper analysis.

These features help organizations make informed decisions based on real data.

AI and Predictive Analytics

AI-powered tools are changing how legislative tracking works.

Capabilities include:

  • AI-powered insights that summarize bills.
  • Predictive analysis of policy changes.
  • Detection of trends across legislation.

These tools help policy professionals quickly understand large volumes of data.

Integration Capabilities

Integration improves team collaboration and workflow.

Look for systems that:

  • Connect with CRM and internal workflow tools.
  • Allow teams to assign tasks and share notes.
  • Support team collaboration across departments.

Integration ensures support teams can work together efficiently.

How to Evaluate Federal Legislative Tracking Software

Selecting the right legislative tracking tool requires a clear evaluation process.

Define Your Organization’s Needs

Start by understanding your organization:

  • Size of your team.
  • Type of legislative and regulatory tracking required.
  • Level of engagement in government affairs.

This helps narrow down options.

Compare Features vs Cost

Pricing varies depending on coverage and features.

  • Basic tools may cost around $1,000.
  • Advanced systems can exceed $5,000.

Focus on ROI rather than price alone.

Assess Data Accuracy and Coverage

Accurate data is essential.

Check:

  • Coverage of federal legislation and regulatory data.
  • Frequency of updates from Congress.
  • Quality of bill summaries and analysis.

to understand how legislative information is structured.

User Experience and Support

User experience affects adoption.

Evaluate:

  • Ease of use.
  • Onboarding and support.
  • Ability for teams to collaborate.

A system should help your team work smarter, not harder.

Common Mistakes to Avoid When Choosing Legislative Tracking Systems

Many organizations choose tools without fully evaluating their needs.

Choosing Based on Price Alone

Low-cost tools may lack comprehensive coverage and advanced reporting.

Ignoring Integration Needs

Without integration, workflow tools become disconnected.

Overlooking User Adoption

Complex systems reduce productivity and team collaboration.

Not Testing the Platform

Always request demos or trials.

Testing ensures the tool fits your organization and supports your team.

Key Benefits of Using Federal Legislative Tracking Software

Organizations that adopt legislative tracking tools gain a clear advantage.

Improved Decision-Making

Access to real-time data leads to better analysis and informed decisions.

Time Efficiency

Automation helps teams save time by reducing manual research.

Enhanced Compliance

Tracking regulations and policy changes reduces compliance risks.

Strategic Advantage

Organizations can stay ahead of policy developments and act early.

Benefits include:

  • Faster response to legislation.
  • Better communication with stakeholders.
  • Stronger advocacy and government relations strategies.

Future Trends in Legislative Monitoring Platforms

Legislative tracking continues to evolve with new technology.

AI and Machine Learning Integration

AI-powered systems provide predictive insights and deeper analysis.

Increased Automation

Automation reduces manual tracking and improves efficiency.

Data-Driven Policy Insights

Advanced analytics provide actionable insights into policy changes.

Organizations are shifting toward intelligent platforms that combine data, AI-powered tools, and automation.

How to Implement Legislative Tracking Software Successfully

Implementation determines long-term success.

Onboarding and Training

Train your team to use the system effectively.

Define Monitoring Criteria

Set alerts, keywords, and policy areas to track bills.

Integrate with Existing Systems

Ensure smooth workflow integration and team collaboration.

Proper setup helps organizations maximize value and stay informed.

Texas Political Spotlight
This is some text inside of a div block.

Welcome back, friends

Texas hemp businesses have filed suit to block new state regulations they say effectively ban smokeable hemp products and impose licensing fee increases so steep they could force many businesses to close. Yesterday, the Texas House State Affairs Committee heard testimony on the explosive growth of data centers in the state, with interconnection requests on the power grid now exceeding 400,000 megawatts and raising questions about cost, reliability, and water usage. Lastly, nineteen Texas summer camps are challenging a new state mandate requiring them to install fiber optic internet infrastructure, citing costs as high as $1.2 million and arguing the requirement is unworkable for rural properties and does nothing to improve camper safety.

Before you dive in…

USLege will be hosting our first ever Best in Government Affairs Awards Ceremony on April 23rd at Speakeasy in Downtown Austin.

Winners and guests will be treated to evening of celebration for the accomplishments in the 89th Texas Legislative Session.

You can expect music, networking, food & drinks and formal award acceptance.  

This is going to be a fun party! We hope to see you there.

»» RSVP HERE: Best in Government Affairs Awards Ceremony hosted by USLege

»» Watch Representative Ken King’s Intro Here ««

We hope you enjoyed today’s read!

Stay connected with TXLege News on X and LinkedIn!

Texas Political Spotlight
This is some text inside of a div block.

Welcome back, friends

A federal trial is underway in Texas over whether the state's prison system has done enough to protect inmates from extreme heat, with a price tag of $1.5 billion standing at the center of the debate. Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows has tasked a new legislative committee with studying whether Texas could absorb one or more counties from New Mexico, a long-shot proposal that has already drawn a sharp response from the neighboring state's governor. A public feud between Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and acting Comptroller Kelly Hancock has spilled into federal court, where a judge is overseeing the fallout in a lawsuit alleging religious discrimination in the state's $1 billion ESA Program.

We hope you enjoyed today’s read!

Stay connected with TXLege News on X and LinkedIn!

Texas Political Spotlight
This is some text inside of a div block.

Welcome back, friends

Texas hemp businesses have filed suit to block new state regulations they say effectively ban smokeable hemp products and impose licensing fee increases so steep they could force many businesses to close. Yesterday, the Texas House State Affairs Committee heard testimony on the explosive growth of data centers in the state, with interconnection requests on the power grid now exceeding 400,000 megawatts and raising questions about cost, reliability, and water usage. Lastly, nineteen Texas summer camps are challenging a new state mandate requiring them to install fiber optic internet infrastructure, citing costs as high as $1.2 million and arguing the requirement is unworkable for rural properties and does nothing to improve camper safety.

Before you dive in…

USLege will be hosting our first ever Best in Government Affairs Awards Ceremony on April 23rd at Speakeasy in Downtown Austin.

Winners and guests will be treated to evening of celebration for the accomplishments in the 89th Texas Legislative Session.

You can expect music, networking, food & drinks and formal award acceptance.  

This is going to be a fun party! We hope to see you there.

»» RSVP HERE: Best in Government Affairs Awards Ceremony hosted by USLege

»» Watch Representative Ken King’s Intro Here ««

We hope you enjoyed today’s read!

Stay connected with TXLege News on X and LinkedIn!

Texas Political Spotlight
This is some text inside of a div block.

Welcome back, friends

A federal trial is underway in Texas over whether the state's prison system has done enough to protect inmates from extreme heat, with a price tag of $1.5 billion standing at the center of the debate. Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows has tasked a new legislative committee with studying whether Texas could absorb one or more counties from New Mexico, a long-shot proposal that has already drawn a sharp response from the neighboring state's governor. A public feud between Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and acting Comptroller Kelly Hancock has spilled into federal court, where a judge is overseeing the fallout in a lawsuit alleging religious discrimination in the state's $1 billion ESA Program.

We hope you enjoyed today’s read!

Stay connected with TXLege News on X and LinkedIn!

Texas Political Spotlight
This is some text inside of a div block.

Welcome back, friends

New Texas rules on hemp-derived THC products take effect March 31, reshaping what can be sold, who can sell it and how the industry operates, with major implications for businesses, consumers and enforcement across the state. Lt. Gov Dan Patrick has unveiled the Texas Senate committee lineup. At the same time, state education leaders are moving to revise curriculum guidance tied to Cesar Chavez amid emerging allegations, prompting immediate changes in classrooms and raising broader questions about how schools respond when historical narratives shift.

»»» View official press release from Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick Here «««

We hope you enjoyed today’s read!

Stay connected with TXLege News on X and LinkedIn!